波斯语版帕金森焦虑量表(P-PAS)的信度和效度评估。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alireza Alikhani, Mehri Salari, Masoud Etemadifar
{"title":"波斯语版帕金森焦虑量表(P-PAS)的信度和效度评估。","authors":"Alireza Alikhani, Mehri Salari, Masoud Etemadifar","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2458701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric manifestations in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). They generally affect one-third of patients and greatly impact their quality of life. There have been several scales for diagnosing anxiety disorders. However, none were created distinctively for PD and lacked the diagnostic qualities for PD patients. The Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) was created to address this issue, and it has demonstrated good psychometric features since. In this study, our aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian adaptation of PAS (P-PAS). The study included 52 patients from Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital's Movement Disorders clinic. During their visits, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and P-PAS were collected. Demographical data and disease history were obtained from the hospital dataset. Two weeks later, the P-PAS was taken from the patients for the second time by phone. Thirty-one (59.6%) of our patients were men. The mean age of the patients was 63.79. The majority (59.6%) of the patients had a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2. Disease duration had a median of 5 years and a range of 1 to 23 years. Cronbach's alpha was 0.839. The intra-class correlation between the two P-PAS was 0.777. P-PAS had a correlation of 0.866, 0.785, and 0.508 with BAI, HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A), and HADS-Depression (HADS-D), respectively. P-PAS exhibited acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It demonstrated good divergent and convergent validity. P-PAS is a reliable and valid scale for use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (P-PAS).\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Alikhani, Mehri Salari, Masoud Etemadifar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2458701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric manifestations in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). They generally affect one-third of patients and greatly impact their quality of life. There have been several scales for diagnosing anxiety disorders. However, none were created distinctively for PD and lacked the diagnostic qualities for PD patients. The Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) was created to address this issue, and it has demonstrated good psychometric features since. In this study, our aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian adaptation of PAS (P-PAS). The study included 52 patients from Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital's Movement Disorders clinic. During their visits, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and P-PAS were collected. Demographical data and disease history were obtained from the hospital dataset. Two weeks later, the P-PAS was taken from the patients for the second time by phone. Thirty-one (59.6%) of our patients were men. The mean age of the patients was 63.79. The majority (59.6%) of the patients had a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2. Disease duration had a median of 5 years and a range of 1 to 23 years. Cronbach's alpha was 0.839. The intra-class correlation between the two P-PAS was 0.777. P-PAS had a correlation of 0.866, 0.785, and 0.508 with BAI, HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A), and HADS-Depression (HADS-D), respectively. P-PAS exhibited acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It demonstrated good divergent and convergent validity. P-PAS is a reliable and valid scale for use in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2458701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2458701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑障碍是帕金森病(PD)患者最常见的精神表现之一。它们通常影响三分之一的患者,并极大地影响他们的生活质量。有几种诊断焦虑症的量表。然而,没有一个是专门为PD创建的,缺乏对PD患者的诊断质量。帕金森焦虑量表(PAS)就是为了解决这个问题而创建的,从那时起它就表现出了良好的心理测量特征。在本研究中,我们的目的是评估PAS波斯语适应性(P-PAS)的效度和可靠性。该研究包括来自Shohada-e-Tajrish医院运动障碍诊所的52名患者。访视期间收集医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和P-PAS。人口统计数据和病史来自医院数据集。两周后,第二次通过电话从患者身上取走P-PAS。31例(59.6%)患者为男性。患者平均年龄63.79岁。大多数患者(59.6%)为Hoehn和Yahr 2期。病程中位数为5年,范围为1至23年。Cronbach’s alpha为0.839。两种P-PAS的类内相关系数为0.777。P-PAS与BAI、hads -焦虑(HADS-A)和hads -抑郁(HADS-D)的相关系数分别为0.866、0.785和0.508。P-PAS具有可接受的内部一致性和重测信度。该方法具有良好的发散有效性和收敛有效性。P-PAS是一个可靠和有效的量表,用于临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (P-PAS).

Anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric manifestations in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). They generally affect one-third of patients and greatly impact their quality of life. There have been several scales for diagnosing anxiety disorders. However, none were created distinctively for PD and lacked the diagnostic qualities for PD patients. The Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) was created to address this issue, and it has demonstrated good psychometric features since. In this study, our aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian adaptation of PAS (P-PAS). The study included 52 patients from Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital's Movement Disorders clinic. During their visits, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and P-PAS were collected. Demographical data and disease history were obtained from the hospital dataset. Two weeks later, the P-PAS was taken from the patients for the second time by phone. Thirty-one (59.6%) of our patients were men. The mean age of the patients was 63.79. The majority (59.6%) of the patients had a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2. Disease duration had a median of 5 years and a range of 1 to 23 years. Cronbach's alpha was 0.839. The intra-class correlation between the two P-PAS was 0.777. P-PAS had a correlation of 0.866, 0.785, and 0.508 with BAI, HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A), and HADS-Depression (HADS-D), respectively. P-PAS exhibited acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It demonstrated good divergent and convergent validity. P-PAS is a reliable and valid scale for use in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信