在劳伦·斯莱特的《百忧解日记》中,百忧解作为药物、隐喻和身份:重新想象康复作为一个修辞过程。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Swikriti Sanyal, Hemachandran Karah
{"title":"在劳伦·斯莱特的《百忧解日记》中,百忧解作为药物、隐喻和身份:重新想象康复作为一个修辞过程。","authors":"Swikriti Sanyal, Hemachandran Karah","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-012973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines Lauren Slater's memoir, <i>Prozac Diary</i>, to understand the role of language in reimagining the notion of recovery. Written from the standpoint of a consumer of antidepressant drugs, <i>Prozac Diary</i> underlines the pervasiveness of professional psychiatry's pathologising practices and its psychopharmacological interventions in the 90s in the USA. Moreover, it unpacks the nuances of the relationship between the person and the pill at the intersections of myriad medical and socio-cultural discourses. Reading the memoir from the perspectives of disability studies scholars such as Kimberly E. Emmons and Lennard J. Davis, we argue that Slater's use of figurative language to critically engage with the Prozac discourse is a rhetorical act of self-care. Furthermore, we contend that by normalising illness and challenging the ableist assumptions of normalcy, Slater also invests in rhetorical care of the collective self/bodymind.This paper demonstrates how through a metaphorical representation of Prozac, Slater questions the predominant mental health discourses that construct the meanings of 'illness' and 'health' and shape illness and health-based identities. Simultaneously, through her dialogical negotiations with the Prozac discourse to reconstitute a complex health identity, she raises fundamental questions about the existence of a 'core', 'authentic', 'healthy', pre-Prozac selfhood that the drug claims to restore. Therefore, by unravelling the intrapersonal, socio-cultural and discursive ramifications of recovery, as opposed to psychiatry's perfunctory understanding of biological cure as a restoration of a socially desirable state of 'normalcy', she is able to reclaim the lived experience of recovery. We argue that in <i>Prozac Diary</i>, recovery does not merely imply a passive internalisation of psychiatry's biological determinism and its psychopharmaceutical approaches. Instead, it is a rhetorical process that enables the medicalised individuals to actively engage with the mental health system and interrogate the possibility of critically responding to its normative frameworks as agentic subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prozac as medicine, metaphor and identity: reimagining recovery as a rhetorical process in Lauren Slater's <i>Prozac Diary</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Swikriti Sanyal, Hemachandran Karah\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2024-012973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines Lauren Slater's memoir, <i>Prozac Diary</i>, to understand the role of language in reimagining the notion of recovery. Written from the standpoint of a consumer of antidepressant drugs, <i>Prozac Diary</i> underlines the pervasiveness of professional psychiatry's pathologising practices and its psychopharmacological interventions in the 90s in the USA. Moreover, it unpacks the nuances of the relationship between the person and the pill at the intersections of myriad medical and socio-cultural discourses. Reading the memoir from the perspectives of disability studies scholars such as Kimberly E. Emmons and Lennard J. Davis, we argue that Slater's use of figurative language to critically engage with the Prozac discourse is a rhetorical act of self-care. Furthermore, we contend that by normalising illness and challenging the ableist assumptions of normalcy, Slater also invests in rhetorical care of the collective self/bodymind.This paper demonstrates how through a metaphorical representation of Prozac, Slater questions the predominant mental health discourses that construct the meanings of 'illness' and 'health' and shape illness and health-based identities. Simultaneously, through her dialogical negotiations with the Prozac discourse to reconstitute a complex health identity, she raises fundamental questions about the existence of a 'core', 'authentic', 'healthy', pre-Prozac selfhood that the drug claims to restore. Therefore, by unravelling the intrapersonal, socio-cultural and discursive ramifications of recovery, as opposed to psychiatry's perfunctory understanding of biological cure as a restoration of a socially desirable state of 'normalcy', she is able to reclaim the lived experience of recovery. We argue that in <i>Prozac Diary</i>, recovery does not merely imply a passive internalisation of psychiatry's biological determinism and its psychopharmaceutical approaches. Instead, it is a rhetorical process that enables the medicalised individuals to actively engage with the mental health system and interrogate the possibility of critically responding to its normative frameworks as agentic subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-012973\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-012973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了劳伦·斯莱特的回忆录《百忧解日记》,以了解语言在重新构想康复概念中的作用。《百忧解日记》从抗抑郁药物消费者的角度出发,强调了20世纪90年代美国专业精神病学病理学实践及其精神药理学干预的普遍性。此外,它还揭示了在无数医学和社会文化话语的交叉点上,人与避孕药之间关系的细微差别。从金伯利·e·埃蒙斯和伦纳德·j·戴维斯等残疾研究学者的角度来阅读这本回忆录,我们认为斯莱特使用比喻性语言来批判性地参与百忧解话语是一种自我照顾的修辞行为。此外,我们认为,通过使疾病正常化和挑战正常的健康主义假设,斯莱特也投资于对集体自我/身心的修辞关怀。本文展示了如何通过百忧解的隐喻表现,斯莱特质疑主流的心理健康话语,这些话语构建了“疾病”和“健康”的意义,塑造了疾病和基于健康的身份。同时,通过她与百忧解话语的对话谈判来重建一个复杂的健康身份,她提出了一个关于“核心”、“真实”、“健康”、百忧解声称要恢复的前自我存在的基本问题。因此,通过揭示康复的个人、社会文化和话语分支,而不是精神病学对生物治疗的敷衍理解,即恢复社会期望的“正常”状态,她能够重新获得康复的生活体验。我们认为,在百忧解日记中,康复并不仅仅意味着精神病学的生物决定论及其精神药物方法的被动内化。相反,这是一个修辞过程,使医疗化的个人能够积极参与精神卫生系统,并询问作为代理主体批判性地回应其规范框架的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prozac as medicine, metaphor and identity: reimagining recovery as a rhetorical process in Lauren Slater's Prozac Diary.

This paper examines Lauren Slater's memoir, Prozac Diary, to understand the role of language in reimagining the notion of recovery. Written from the standpoint of a consumer of antidepressant drugs, Prozac Diary underlines the pervasiveness of professional psychiatry's pathologising practices and its psychopharmacological interventions in the 90s in the USA. Moreover, it unpacks the nuances of the relationship between the person and the pill at the intersections of myriad medical and socio-cultural discourses. Reading the memoir from the perspectives of disability studies scholars such as Kimberly E. Emmons and Lennard J. Davis, we argue that Slater's use of figurative language to critically engage with the Prozac discourse is a rhetorical act of self-care. Furthermore, we contend that by normalising illness and challenging the ableist assumptions of normalcy, Slater also invests in rhetorical care of the collective self/bodymind.This paper demonstrates how through a metaphorical representation of Prozac, Slater questions the predominant mental health discourses that construct the meanings of 'illness' and 'health' and shape illness and health-based identities. Simultaneously, through her dialogical negotiations with the Prozac discourse to reconstitute a complex health identity, she raises fundamental questions about the existence of a 'core', 'authentic', 'healthy', pre-Prozac selfhood that the drug claims to restore. Therefore, by unravelling the intrapersonal, socio-cultural and discursive ramifications of recovery, as opposed to psychiatry's perfunctory understanding of biological cure as a restoration of a socially desirable state of 'normalcy', she is able to reclaim the lived experience of recovery. We argue that in Prozac Diary, recovery does not merely imply a passive internalisation of psychiatry's biological determinism and its psychopharmaceutical approaches. Instead, it is a rhetorical process that enables the medicalised individuals to actively engage with the mental health system and interrogate the possibility of critically responding to its normative frameworks as agentic subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信