{"title":"指导首次人体试验和早期患者研究:研究设计、风险缓解和人群选择的挑战。","authors":"Jocelyn Courville, Amanda Barber, Aberra Fura","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First-in-human (FIH) and early-phase clinical studies have increasingly become an integral part of the entire clinical development process, applying integrated protocols and robust risk mitigation strategies to enhance participant safety and development efficiency. This manuscript focuses on the diverse study designs employed in FIH studies, strategies for effective risk mitigation, suitable study population selection, and the methodologies and considerations unique to early-phase patient trials. FIH studies typically include single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts that may be conducted in healthy volunteers (HVs) or with relevant patient populations. An analysis of 193 compounds approved by the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 2020 and 2023 revealed that 47.7% (92 out of 193) conducted FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies in healthy volunteers, while 39.4% (76 out of 193) initiated their FIH studies in the relevant patient population. The status for 12.9% (25 out of 193) was unknown. Among the programs that did not involve healthy volunteers for FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies, 65.8% (50 out of 76) were developed for oncology indications, whereas the remaining 34.2% (26 out of 76) were involved in therapeutic areas such as rare disease, genetic disorders, and ophthalmology. This manuscript highlights the importance of tailoring scientific and operational approaches to specific molecules, indications, and patient relevance. It provides tools, strategies, and a mind map to effectively navigate challenges during this phase of the development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating First-in-Human and Early-Phase Patient Studies: Study Designs, Risk Mitigation, and Population Selection Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Courville, Amanda Barber, Aberra Fura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>First-in-human (FIH) and early-phase clinical studies have increasingly become an integral part of the entire clinical development process, applying integrated protocols and robust risk mitigation strategies to enhance participant safety and development efficiency. This manuscript focuses on the diverse study designs employed in FIH studies, strategies for effective risk mitigation, suitable study population selection, and the methodologies and considerations unique to early-phase patient trials. FIH studies typically include single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts that may be conducted in healthy volunteers (HVs) or with relevant patient populations. An analysis of 193 compounds approved by the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 2020 and 2023 revealed that 47.7% (92 out of 193) conducted FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies in healthy volunteers, while 39.4% (76 out of 193) initiated their FIH studies in the relevant patient population. The status for 12.9% (25 out of 193) was unknown. Among the programs that did not involve healthy volunteers for FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies, 65.8% (50 out of 76) were developed for oncology indications, whereas the remaining 34.2% (26 out of 76) were involved in therapeutic areas such as rare disease, genetic disorders, and ophthalmology. This manuscript highlights the importance of tailoring scientific and operational approaches to specific molecules, indications, and patient relevance. It provides tools, strategies, and a mind map to effectively navigate challenges during this phase of the development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating First-in-Human and Early-Phase Patient Studies: Study Designs, Risk Mitigation, and Population Selection Challenges.
First-in-human (FIH) and early-phase clinical studies have increasingly become an integral part of the entire clinical development process, applying integrated protocols and robust risk mitigation strategies to enhance participant safety and development efficiency. This manuscript focuses on the diverse study designs employed in FIH studies, strategies for effective risk mitigation, suitable study population selection, and the methodologies and considerations unique to early-phase patient trials. FIH studies typically include single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts that may be conducted in healthy volunteers (HVs) or with relevant patient populations. An analysis of 193 compounds approved by the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 2020 and 2023 revealed that 47.7% (92 out of 193) conducted FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies in healthy volunteers, while 39.4% (76 out of 193) initiated their FIH studies in the relevant patient population. The status for 12.9% (25 out of 193) was unknown. Among the programs that did not involve healthy volunteers for FIH or initial SAD/MAD studies, 65.8% (50 out of 76) were developed for oncology indications, whereas the remaining 34.2% (26 out of 76) were involved in therapeutic areas such as rare disease, genetic disorders, and ophthalmology. This manuscript highlights the importance of tailoring scientific and operational approaches to specific molecules, indications, and patient relevance. It provides tools, strategies, and a mind map to effectively navigate challenges during this phase of the development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.