磁悬浮假体治疗严重眼睑外翻的单中心假体和主动控制双盲随机交叉试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kevin E Houston, Shrinivas Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Alex R Bowers, Sarah LaRosa, Mara Robinson, James Chodosh, Lynn Brandes, Patrick Lee, Eleftherios I Paschalis
{"title":"磁悬浮假体治疗严重眼睑外翻的单中心假体和主动控制双盲随机交叉试验。","authors":"Kevin E Houston, Shrinivas Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Alex R Bowers, Sarah LaRosa, Mara Robinson, James Chodosh, Lynn Brandes, Patrick Lee, Eleftherios I Paschalis","doi":"10.1167/tvst.14.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the magnetic levator prosthesis (MLP) relative to active control with KT Tape, an elastic therapeutic tape used clinically to mechanically open the lids, and to a sham MLP worn in-office only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-masked, randomized crossover single-center trial of patients with severe unilateral or bilateral paralytic blepharoptosis defined as occlusion of the visual axis without frontalis recruitment. Patients were allocated to MLP or tape first and then crossed over after 2 weeks of use and a 2-week washout. Primary outcome was maximum eyelid closure on spontaneous blink measured in video frames with ImageJ. Primary patient-reported outcome was the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and, secondarily, comparison of the amount of eye opening and proportions of complete volitional blinks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16 patients randomized, 15 completed the crossover. MLP and tape equally improved eye opening over sham (MLP, 6.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-8.4]; tape, 7.0 mm [5.4-8.6]; sham, 3.9 mm [2.3-5.5], all P < 0.001). Spontaneous blinks were significantly better with MLP (2.4 mm [95% CI, 1.5-3.7] compared to tape, 4.1 mm [2.6-6.5], P < 0.001). Incomplete volitional blinks were much more common when wearing tape compared to when wearing the MLP (P < 0.001), which was not different from sham. There was a significant perceived benefit of both MLP and tape (P < 0.001). There were three related nonserious adverse events over 3539 hours of tape use and two related nonserious adverse events over 4632 hours of MLP use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MLP was superior to KT tape and sham for the treatment of severe blepharoptosis.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>First randomized controlled clinical trial of the MLP. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678115?cond=Blepharoptosis&term=kinesiotape&rank=1, NCT04678115).</p>","PeriodicalId":23322,"journal":{"name":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","volume":"14 2","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Single-Center Sham and Active-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial of the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis for Severe Blepharoptosis.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin E Houston, Shrinivas Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Alex R Bowers, Sarah LaRosa, Mara Robinson, James Chodosh, Lynn Brandes, Patrick Lee, Eleftherios I Paschalis\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/tvst.14.2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the magnetic levator prosthesis (MLP) relative to active control with KT Tape, an elastic therapeutic tape used clinically to mechanically open the lids, and to a sham MLP worn in-office only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-masked, randomized crossover single-center trial of patients with severe unilateral or bilateral paralytic blepharoptosis defined as occlusion of the visual axis without frontalis recruitment. Patients were allocated to MLP or tape first and then crossed over after 2 weeks of use and a 2-week washout. Primary outcome was maximum eyelid closure on spontaneous blink measured in video frames with ImageJ. Primary patient-reported outcome was the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and, secondarily, comparison of the amount of eye opening and proportions of complete volitional blinks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16 patients randomized, 15 completed the crossover. MLP and tape equally improved eye opening over sham (MLP, 6.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-8.4]; tape, 7.0 mm [5.4-8.6]; sham, 3.9 mm [2.3-5.5], all P < 0.001). Spontaneous blinks were significantly better with MLP (2.4 mm [95% CI, 1.5-3.7] compared to tape, 4.1 mm [2.6-6.5], P < 0.001). Incomplete volitional blinks were much more common when wearing tape compared to when wearing the MLP (P < 0.001), which was not different from sham. There was a significant perceived benefit of both MLP and tape (P < 0.001). There were three related nonserious adverse events over 3539 hours of tape use and two related nonserious adverse events over 4632 hours of MLP use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MLP was superior to KT tape and sham for the treatment of severe blepharoptosis.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>First randomized controlled clinical trial of the MLP. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678115?cond=Blepharoptosis&term=kinesiotape&rank=1, NCT04678115).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Vision Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Vision Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.14.2.15\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.14.2.15","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价磁提肌假体(MLP)相对于KT带(一种临床用于机械打开眼睑的弹性治疗带)主动控制和仅在办公室佩戴的假MLP的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项双盲、随机交叉、单中心试验,患者为严重单侧或双侧麻痹性上睑下垂,定义为视觉轴闭塞而没有额肌恢复。患者首先被分配到MLP或胶带,然后在使用2周和2周的洗脱期后交叉。主要结果是用ImageJ在视频帧中测量自发眨眼的最大眼睑闭合。患者报告的主要结果是格拉斯哥获益量表,其次是睁眼次数和完全自主眨眼比例的比较。结果:16例随机患者中,15例完成交叉。与假手术相比,MLP和胶带同样改善了眼开度(MLP, 6.8 mm[95%可信区间(CI), 5.2-8.4];胶带,7.0 mm [5.4-8.6];sham, 3.9 mm[2.3 ~ 5.5],均P < 0.001)。MLP组自发性眨眼明显优于胶带组(2.4 mm [95% CI, 1.5-3.7], 4.1 mm [2.6-6.5], P < 0.001)。与佩戴MLP相比,佩戴胶带时不完全意志性眨眼更常见(P < 0.001),与假手术没有区别。MLP和胶带均有显著的获益(P < 0.001)。使用胶带3539小时有3个相关的非严重不良事件,使用MLP 4632小时有2个相关的非严重不良事件。结论:MLP治疗重度上睑下垂的效果优于KT带和假手术。翻译相关性:MLP的首个随机对照临床试验。NCT04678115 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678115?cond=Blepharoptosis&term=kinesiotape&rank=1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Single-Center Sham and Active-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial of the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis for Severe Blepharoptosis.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the magnetic levator prosthesis (MLP) relative to active control with KT Tape, an elastic therapeutic tape used clinically to mechanically open the lids, and to a sham MLP worn in-office only.

Methods: This was a double-masked, randomized crossover single-center trial of patients with severe unilateral or bilateral paralytic blepharoptosis defined as occlusion of the visual axis without frontalis recruitment. Patients were allocated to MLP or tape first and then crossed over after 2 weeks of use and a 2-week washout. Primary outcome was maximum eyelid closure on spontaneous blink measured in video frames with ImageJ. Primary patient-reported outcome was the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and, secondarily, comparison of the amount of eye opening and proportions of complete volitional blinks.

Results: Of 16 patients randomized, 15 completed the crossover. MLP and tape equally improved eye opening over sham (MLP, 6.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-8.4]; tape, 7.0 mm [5.4-8.6]; sham, 3.9 mm [2.3-5.5], all P < 0.001). Spontaneous blinks were significantly better with MLP (2.4 mm [95% CI, 1.5-3.7] compared to tape, 4.1 mm [2.6-6.5], P < 0.001). Incomplete volitional blinks were much more common when wearing tape compared to when wearing the MLP (P < 0.001), which was not different from sham. There was a significant perceived benefit of both MLP and tape (P < 0.001). There were three related nonserious adverse events over 3539 hours of tape use and two related nonserious adverse events over 4632 hours of MLP use.

Conclusions: The MLP was superior to KT tape and sham for the treatment of severe blepharoptosis.

Translational relevance: First randomized controlled clinical trial of the MLP. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678115?cond=Blepharoptosis&term=kinesiotape&rank=1, NCT04678115).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Translational Vision Science & Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
346
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Vision Science & Technology (TVST), an official journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), an international organization whose purpose is to advance research worldwide into understanding the visual system and preventing, treating and curing its disorders, is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal emphasizing multidisciplinary research that bridges the gap between basic research and clinical care. A highly qualified and diverse group of Associate Editors and Editorial Board Members is led by Editor-in-Chief Marco Zarbin, MD, PhD, FARVO. The journal covers a broad spectrum of work, including but not limited to: Applications of stem cell technology for regenerative medicine, Development of new animal models of human diseases, Tissue bioengineering, Chemical engineering to improve virus-based gene delivery, Nanotechnology for drug delivery, Design and synthesis of artificial extracellular matrices, Development of a true microsurgical operating environment, Refining data analysis algorithms to improve in vivo imaging technology, Results of Phase 1 clinical trials, Reverse translational ("bedside to bench") research. TVST seeks manuscripts from scientists and clinicians with diverse backgrounds ranging from basic chemistry to ophthalmic surgery that will advance or change the way we understand and/or treat vision-threatening diseases. TVST encourages the use of color, multimedia, hyperlinks, program code and other digital enhancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信