COVID-19大流行期间OSAS患者PAP设备使用和COVID-19相关焦虑的评估

0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thoracic research and practice Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029
Gulin Sunter, Humay Ismayilzade, Beyza Arslan, Ezgi Vural, Baran Balcan, Kadriye Agan
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间OSAS患者PAP设备使用和COVID-19相关焦虑的评估","authors":"Gulin Sunter, Humay Ismayilzade, Beyza Arslan, Ezgi Vural, Baran Balcan, Kadriye Agan","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to determine the positive airway pressure (PAP) device usage and pandemic-related anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five hundred twenty-seven OSAS patients were recruited into the study. A questionnaire consisting of 7 questions was filled to find out their Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related anxiety levels and PAP device usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (±11.9). One hundred forty-one 141 (27%) of the participants were female and 382 (73%) were male. Two hundred sixteen (41%) patients reported using the PAP device regularly [PAP (+) group); 307 (59%) patients reported not using it at all or using it irregularly (PAP (-) group]. Forty-nine (23%) PAP (+) patients and 91 (29%) PAP (-) patients had COVID-19. The use of a PAP device was not significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (<i>P</i> = 0.077). The most common symptom was myalgia without a between-group difference, (<i>P</i> = 0.967). There was no significant difference between the PAP (+) and PAP (-) groups in the hospitalization rates for COVID-19 (<i>P</i> = 0.252). The presence of apnea was not considered as a cause of a higher level of COVID-19-related anxiety in patients with the PAP (+) group compared to the PAP (-) group (<i>P</i> = 0.095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence that the use of PAP devices in OSAS patients influenced the risk of getting COVID-19 and the clinical course of the disease. PAP device usage did not affect the level of anxiety associated with the pandemic in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"132-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of PAP Device Usage and COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Patients with OSAS During COVID-19 Pandemics\",\"authors\":\"Gulin Sunter, Humay Ismayilzade, Beyza Arslan, Ezgi Vural, Baran Balcan, Kadriye Agan\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to determine the positive airway pressure (PAP) device usage and pandemic-related anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five hundred twenty-seven OSAS patients were recruited into the study. A questionnaire consisting of 7 questions was filled to find out their Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related anxiety levels and PAP device usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (±11.9). One hundred forty-one 141 (27%) of the participants were female and 382 (73%) were male. Two hundred sixteen (41%) patients reported using the PAP device regularly [PAP (+) group); 307 (59%) patients reported not using it at all or using it irregularly (PAP (-) group]. Forty-nine (23%) PAP (+) patients and 91 (29%) PAP (-) patients had COVID-19. The use of a PAP device was not significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (<i>P</i> = 0.077). The most common symptom was myalgia without a between-group difference, (<i>P</i> = 0.967). There was no significant difference between the PAP (+) and PAP (-) groups in the hospitalization rates for COVID-19 (<i>P</i> = 0.252). The presence of apnea was not considered as a cause of a higher level of COVID-19-related anxiety in patients with the PAP (+) group compared to the PAP (-) group (<i>P</i> = 0.095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence that the use of PAP devices in OSAS patients influenced the risk of getting COVID-19 and the clinical course of the disease. PAP device usage did not affect the level of anxiety associated with the pandemic in patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"132-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们旨在确定大流行期间阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者气道正压通气(PAP)设备的使用情况和与大流行相关的焦虑。材料和方法:527例OSAS患者被纳入研究。填写了一份由7个问题组成的问卷,以了解他们与冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的焦虑水平和PAP设备的使用情况。结果:患者平均年龄53.3岁(±11.9岁)。其中14141人(27%)为女性,382人(73%)为男性。216例(41%)患者报告定期使用PAP设备[PAP(+)组];307例(59%)患者报告完全不使用或不定期使用(PAP(-)组)。49例(23%)PAP(+)患者和91例(29%)PAP(-)患者合并了COVID-19。PAP设备的使用与COVID-19感染风险的增加无显著相关(P = 0.077)。最常见的症状为肌痛,组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.967)。PAP(+)组与PAP(-)组COVID-19住院率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.252)。与PAP(-)组相比,PAP(+)组患者的covid -19相关焦虑水平较高,呼吸暂停的存在不被认为是原因(P = 0.095)。结论:没有证据表明osaas患者使用PAP设备对感染COVID-19的风险和临床病程有影响。PAP设备的使用不影响患者与大流行相关的焦虑水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of PAP Device Usage and COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Patients with OSAS During COVID-19 Pandemics

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the positive airway pressure (PAP) device usage and pandemic-related anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients during the pandemic.

Material and methods: Five hundred twenty-seven OSAS patients were recruited into the study. A questionnaire consisting of 7 questions was filled to find out their Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related anxiety levels and PAP device usage.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (±11.9). One hundred forty-one 141 (27%) of the participants were female and 382 (73%) were male. Two hundred sixteen (41%) patients reported using the PAP device regularly [PAP (+) group); 307 (59%) patients reported not using it at all or using it irregularly (PAP (-) group]. Forty-nine (23%) PAP (+) patients and 91 (29%) PAP (-) patients had COVID-19. The use of a PAP device was not significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (P = 0.077). The most common symptom was myalgia without a between-group difference, (P = 0.967). There was no significant difference between the PAP (+) and PAP (-) groups in the hospitalization rates for COVID-19 (P = 0.252). The presence of apnea was not considered as a cause of a higher level of COVID-19-related anxiety in patients with the PAP (+) group compared to the PAP (-) group (P = 0.095).

Conclusion: There was no evidence that the use of PAP devices in OSAS patients influenced the risk of getting COVID-19 and the clinical course of the disease. PAP device usage did not affect the level of anxiety associated with the pandemic in patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信