Agnes C Gläsel, Kristina Weiler, Alexander Pankraz, Natali Bauer
{"title":"Evaluation of the analytical performance of a point-of-care analyzer for the measurement of feline serum thyroxine concentration in comparison with a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay.","authors":"Agnes C Gläsel, Kristina Weiler, Alexander Pankraz, Natali Bauer","doi":"10.1111/vcp.13416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total thyroxine (TT4) measurement is used to assess thyroid status in cats.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the prospective study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the point-of-care analyzer (POCA) Immuno AU10V using the v-T4 test kit for feline TT4 measurement. Additionally, method comparison with a benchtop analyzer (IMMULITE 2000) was done.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation included linearity, inter- and intra-assay precision, precision near the lower limit of quantification (LloQ), and interference testing for hemoglobin, lipid, and bilirubin. Correlation and bias were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linearity was given within the dynamic range. Coefficients of variation (CV) were ≤4% near the LloQ as well as for intra-and inter-assay precision. No interference was observed for lipid and bilirubin, while hemoglobin caused a negative bias of 28%. Method comparison included 74 samples within three TT4 concentration ranges (0.5-3.7, >3.7-5.13, >5.13-8 μg/dL). Correlation between POCA and reference method was excellent (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.95) with a slight proportional bias of 4.5%. TE<sub>obs</sub> was between 7.0% and 9.8%. Despite substantial agreement, discordant results on thyroid status occurred in 15% of samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analytical performance of the POCA was excellent, as was its correlation with the reference method. Except for the interferent effect of hemoglobin, the TE<sub>obs</sub> was <TE<sub>a</sub> for all analyses. Analysis of severely hemolytic samples is not advised. However, the relatively small dynamic range of the POCA precludes quantitative analysis of samples with TT4 >8 μg/dL, and de novo reference intervals need to be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":23593,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.13416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the analytical performance of a point-of-care analyzer for the measurement of feline serum thyroxine concentration in comparison with a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay.
Background: Total thyroxine (TT4) measurement is used to assess thyroid status in cats.
Objectives: The aim of the prospective study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the point-of-care analyzer (POCA) Immuno AU10V using the v-T4 test kit for feline TT4 measurement. Additionally, method comparison with a benchtop analyzer (IMMULITE 2000) was done.
Methods: Validation included linearity, inter- and intra-assay precision, precision near the lower limit of quantification (LloQ), and interference testing for hemoglobin, lipid, and bilirubin. Correlation and bias were assessed.
Results: Linearity was given within the dynamic range. Coefficients of variation (CV) were ≤4% near the LloQ as well as for intra-and inter-assay precision. No interference was observed for lipid and bilirubin, while hemoglobin caused a negative bias of 28%. Method comparison included 74 samples within three TT4 concentration ranges (0.5-3.7, >3.7-5.13, >5.13-8 μg/dL). Correlation between POCA and reference method was excellent (rs = 0.95) with a slight proportional bias of 4.5%. TEobs was between 7.0% and 9.8%. Despite substantial agreement, discordant results on thyroid status occurred in 15% of samples.
Conclusions: The analytical performance of the POCA was excellent, as was its correlation with the reference method. Except for the interferent effect of hemoglobin, the TEobs was a for all analyses. Analysis of severely hemolytic samples is not advised. However, the relatively small dynamic range of the POCA precludes quantitative analysis of samples with TT4 >8 μg/dL, and de novo reference intervals need to be established.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Clinical Pathology is the official journal of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) and the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ESVCP). The journal''s mission is to provide an international forum for communication and discussion of scientific investigations and new developments that advance the art and science of laboratory diagnosis in animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology welcomes original experimental research and clinical contributions involving domestic, laboratory, avian, and wildlife species in the areas of hematology, hemostasis, immunopathology, clinical chemistry, cytopathology, surgical pathology, toxicology, endocrinology, laboratory and analytical techniques, instrumentation, quality assurance, and clinical pathology education.