影响第一代职业治疗学生学业成绩低下的因素。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Pola Ham
{"title":"影响第一代职业治疗学生学业成绩低下的因素。","authors":"Pola Ham","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research on the factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students studying occupational therapy is limited, and how these factors affect the students' academic performance is insufficiently described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how first-generation students in occupational therapy perceive their academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Occupational therapy program on the East Coast of the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The total sample included 18 first-generation students in occupational therapy through purposeful sampling. Eighteen participants completed the survey, and 5 participants participated in the interview.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Measures included a demographic questionnaire, the Self-Efficacy for Learning Form-Abridged, the Survey of Student Engagement, the Social Integration Scale, and semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported a low level of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study fills the gap in research regarding factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students in occupational therapy and how the identified barriers of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration can be addressed for these students. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored how first-generation occupational therapy students think about their academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Students reported a low level of academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Identifying and understanding the factors that affect the academic performance of first-generation students can improve the support and services provided by occupational therapy programs to first-generation students. Positionality Statement: Positionality is described as the location of the researcher in their research (Milner, 2007). It influences the researcher's assumptions, findings, and interpretations (Banks, 2015). As a first-generation doctoral student, I identify with the unique challenges faced by many first-generation students. As Milner (2007) suggested, it is important to be introspective during research and acknowledge any internal biases to maintain objectivity during the research process. I aimed to be reflexive by taking notes about my thoughts throughout the study to actively reflect on my understanding of how my positionality may affect my data collection and analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Contributing to Low Academic Performance of First-Generation Students in Occupational Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Pola Ham\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.050875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research on the factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students studying occupational therapy is limited, and how these factors affect the students' academic performance is insufficiently described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how first-generation students in occupational therapy perceive their academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Occupational therapy program on the East Coast of the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The total sample included 18 first-generation students in occupational therapy through purposeful sampling. Eighteen participants completed the survey, and 5 participants participated in the interview.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Measures included a demographic questionnaire, the Self-Efficacy for Learning Form-Abridged, the Survey of Student Engagement, the Social Integration Scale, and semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported a low level of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study fills the gap in research regarding factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students in occupational therapy and how the identified barriers of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration can be addressed for these students. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored how first-generation occupational therapy students think about their academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Students reported a low level of academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Identifying and understanding the factors that affect the academic performance of first-generation students can improve the support and services provided by occupational therapy programs to first-generation students. Positionality Statement: Positionality is described as the location of the researcher in their research (Milner, 2007). It influences the researcher's assumptions, findings, and interpretations (Banks, 2015). As a first-generation doctoral student, I identify with the unique challenges faced by many first-generation students. As Milner (2007) suggested, it is important to be introspective during research and acknowledge any internal biases to maintain objectivity during the research process. I aimed to be reflexive by taking notes about my thoughts throughout the study to actively reflect on my understanding of how my positionality may affect my data collection and analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:对第一代职业治疗学生学业成绩低的影响因素的研究有限,这些因素如何影响学生学业成绩的描述也不够充分。目的:探讨第一代职业治疗学生对学业自我效能感、学业投入和社会融入的认知。设计:解释性顺序混合方法设计。背景:美国东海岸的职业治疗项目。参与者:通过有目的的抽样,总样本包括18名第一代职业治疗学生。18位参与者完成了问卷调查,5位参与者参加了访谈。结果和测量方法:测量方法包括人口调查问卷、学习自我效能表(简编)、学生参与调查、社会整合量表和半结构化访谈。结果:被试的学业自我效能、学业投入和社会融合水平较低。结论和相关性:本研究填补了有关第一代学生在职业治疗中学业成绩低下的因素以及如何为这些学生解决学业自我效能、学业投入和社会融入方面的障碍的研究空白。摘要:本研究探讨了第一代职业治疗学生如何看待他们的学业成绩、敬业度和社会融合。据报告,学生们的学习成绩、参与度和社会融合水平都很低。识别和理解影响第一代学生学业成绩的因素可以改善职业治疗项目为第一代学生提供的支持和服务。位置陈述:位置被描述为研究人员在他们的研究中的位置(米尔纳,2007)。它会影响研究者的假设、发现和解释(Banks, 2015)。作为第一代博士生,我认同许多第一代博士生所面临的独特挑战。正如Milner(2007)所建议的,在研究过程中,重要的是要内省,并承认任何内部偏见,以保持研究过程中的客观性。我的目标是反思,在整个学习过程中记录我的想法,积极反思我对我的立场如何影响我的数据收集和分析的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Contributing to Low Academic Performance of First-Generation Students in Occupational Therapy.

Importance: Research on the factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students studying occupational therapy is limited, and how these factors affect the students' academic performance is insufficiently described.

Objective: To explore how first-generation students in occupational therapy perceive their academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.

Design: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.

Setting: Occupational therapy program on the East Coast of the United States.

Participants: The total sample included 18 first-generation students in occupational therapy through purposeful sampling. Eighteen participants completed the survey, and 5 participants participated in the interview.

Outcomes and measures: Measures included a demographic questionnaire, the Self-Efficacy for Learning Form-Abridged, the Survey of Student Engagement, the Social Integration Scale, and semistructured interviews.

Results: Participants reported a low level of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration.

Conclusions and relevance: This study fills the gap in research regarding factors contributing to low academic performance of first-generation students in occupational therapy and how the identified barriers of academic self-efficacy, academic engagement, and social integration can be addressed for these students. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored how first-generation occupational therapy students think about their academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Students reported a low level of academic performance, engagement, and social integration. Identifying and understanding the factors that affect the academic performance of first-generation students can improve the support and services provided by occupational therapy programs to first-generation students. Positionality Statement: Positionality is described as the location of the researcher in their research (Milner, 2007). It influences the researcher's assumptions, findings, and interpretations (Banks, 2015). As a first-generation doctoral student, I identify with the unique challenges faced by many first-generation students. As Milner (2007) suggested, it is important to be introspective during research and acknowledge any internal biases to maintain objectivity during the research process. I aimed to be reflexive by taking notes about my thoughts throughout the study to actively reflect on my understanding of how my positionality may affect my data collection and analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信