{"title":"通过自动图像字幕改进大脑活动图像重建。","authors":"Fatemeh Kalantari, Karim Faez, Hamidreza Amindavar, Soheila Nazari","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89242-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant progress has been made in the field of image reconstruction using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Certain investigations reconstructed images with visual information decoded from brain signals, yielding insufficient accuracy and quality. The combination of semantic information in the reconstruction was recommended to improve performance. However, this issue continues to come across numerous difficulties. To address such problems, we proposed an approach that combines semantically complex details with visual details for reconstruction. Our proposed method consists of two main modules: visual reconstruction and semantic reconstruction. In the visual reconstruction module, visual information is decoded from brain data using a decoder. This module employs a deep generator network (DGN) to produce images and utilizes a VGG19 network to extract visual features from the generated images. Image optimization is performed iteratively to minimize the error between features decoded from brain data and features extracted from the generated image. In the semantic reconstruction module, two models BLIP and LDM are employed. Using the BLIP model, we generate 10 captions for each training image. The semantic features extracted from the image captions, along with brain data obtained from training sessions, are used to train a decoder. The trained decoder is then utilized to decode semantic features from human brain activity. Finally, the reconstructed image from the visual reconstruction module is used as input to the LDM model, while the semantic features decoded from brain activity are provided as conditional input for semantic reconstruction. Including decoded semantic features improves reconstruction quality, as confirmed by our ablation study. Our strategy is superior both qualitatively and quantitatively to Shen et al.'s method, which utilizes a similar dataset. Our methodology achieved an accuracy of 0.812 and 0.815 for the inception and contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP) metrics, respectively, which are excellent for the quantitative evaluation of semantic content. We achieved an accuracy of 0.328 in the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), indicating superior performance as a low-level metric. Moreover, our proposed approach for semantic reconstruction of artificial shapes and imagined images achieved acceptable success, attaining accuracies of 0.566 and 0.627 based on the CLIP metric, and 0.671 and 0.565 based on the SSIM metric, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"4907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved image reconstruction from brain activity through automatic image captioning.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Kalantari, Karim Faez, Hamidreza Amindavar, Soheila Nazari\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-89242-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Significant progress has been made in the field of image reconstruction using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Certain investigations reconstructed images with visual information decoded from brain signals, yielding insufficient accuracy and quality. The combination of semantic information in the reconstruction was recommended to improve performance. However, this issue continues to come across numerous difficulties. To address such problems, we proposed an approach that combines semantically complex details with visual details for reconstruction. Our proposed method consists of two main modules: visual reconstruction and semantic reconstruction. In the visual reconstruction module, visual information is decoded from brain data using a decoder. This module employs a deep generator network (DGN) to produce images and utilizes a VGG19 network to extract visual features from the generated images. Image optimization is performed iteratively to minimize the error between features decoded from brain data and features extracted from the generated image. In the semantic reconstruction module, two models BLIP and LDM are employed. Using the BLIP model, we generate 10 captions for each training image. The semantic features extracted from the image captions, along with brain data obtained from training sessions, are used to train a decoder. The trained decoder is then utilized to decode semantic features from human brain activity. Finally, the reconstructed image from the visual reconstruction module is used as input to the LDM model, while the semantic features decoded from brain activity are provided as conditional input for semantic reconstruction. Including decoded semantic features improves reconstruction quality, as confirmed by our ablation study. Our strategy is superior both qualitatively and quantitatively to Shen et al.'s method, which utilizes a similar dataset. Our methodology achieved an accuracy of 0.812 and 0.815 for the inception and contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP) metrics, respectively, which are excellent for the quantitative evaluation of semantic content. We achieved an accuracy of 0.328 in the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), indicating superior performance as a low-level metric. Moreover, our proposed approach for semantic reconstruction of artificial shapes and imagined images achieved acceptable success, attaining accuracies of 0.566 and 0.627 based on the CLIP metric, and 0.671 and 0.565 based on the SSIM metric, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"4907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89242-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89242-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved image reconstruction from brain activity through automatic image captioning.
Significant progress has been made in the field of image reconstruction using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Certain investigations reconstructed images with visual information decoded from brain signals, yielding insufficient accuracy and quality. The combination of semantic information in the reconstruction was recommended to improve performance. However, this issue continues to come across numerous difficulties. To address such problems, we proposed an approach that combines semantically complex details with visual details for reconstruction. Our proposed method consists of two main modules: visual reconstruction and semantic reconstruction. In the visual reconstruction module, visual information is decoded from brain data using a decoder. This module employs a deep generator network (DGN) to produce images and utilizes a VGG19 network to extract visual features from the generated images. Image optimization is performed iteratively to minimize the error between features decoded from brain data and features extracted from the generated image. In the semantic reconstruction module, two models BLIP and LDM are employed. Using the BLIP model, we generate 10 captions for each training image. The semantic features extracted from the image captions, along with brain data obtained from training sessions, are used to train a decoder. The trained decoder is then utilized to decode semantic features from human brain activity. Finally, the reconstructed image from the visual reconstruction module is used as input to the LDM model, while the semantic features decoded from brain activity are provided as conditional input for semantic reconstruction. Including decoded semantic features improves reconstruction quality, as confirmed by our ablation study. Our strategy is superior both qualitatively and quantitatively to Shen et al.'s method, which utilizes a similar dataset. Our methodology achieved an accuracy of 0.812 and 0.815 for the inception and contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP) metrics, respectively, which are excellent for the quantitative evaluation of semantic content. We achieved an accuracy of 0.328 in the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), indicating superior performance as a low-level metric. Moreover, our proposed approach for semantic reconstruction of artificial shapes and imagined images achieved acceptable success, attaining accuracies of 0.566 and 0.627 based on the CLIP metric, and 0.671 and 0.565 based on the SSIM metric, respectively.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.