使用行动后审查,以确定快速反应的实施战略,以应对青少年中出现的毒品。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x
Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Suzanne Brown, Christina Holmes, Barry Schmidt, Eric Swihart, Tracy Robinson, Bo Kim
{"title":"使用行动后审查,以确定快速反应的实施战略,以应对青少年中出现的毒品。","authors":"Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Suzanne Brown, Christina Holmes, Barry Schmidt, Eric Swihart, Tracy Robinson, Bo Kim","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving educators and researchers struggling to respond promptly. Widely adopted universal evidence-based interventions (EBIs), such as the Michigan Model for Health™ (MMH), and their delivery systems offer an opportunity to reach large youth populations and reduce the onset and escalation of emerging drug use trends. Tier 1 EBIs do not always reflect the most current needs of the context and population. Implementation strategies are needed to optimize EBIs and system responsiveness to emerging drugs. This study employs after action review (AAR) to examine past responses to emerging drugs and design implementation strategies for rapid responses. AAR centers on four key questions: (1) What was expected to happen? (2) What happened? (3) What went well? and (4) What can be improved? We collected qualitative data from 35 participants, including state education partners, school administrators, counselors, teachers, prevention specialists, and the state's health coordinator network. We used rapid qualitative and iterative inductive-deductive thematic analytic approaches. Data analysis revealed three central tenets for rapid responses: collaboration, readiness, and planning. We then identified implementation strategy core functions aligned with the central tenets and strategy form options (e.g., build/leverage a coalition) for each function to accommodate school-level heterogeneity. We created a systematic process to develop and deploy an implementation blueprint for building prevention infrastructure to enhance rapid responses for emerging drugs leveraging an existing intervention (MMH) and delivery system. AAR is a promising approach to identifying gaps and best practices in school-based responses to urgent drug crises. Our results indicate that while the core implementation strategy functions are constant, health coordinators benefit from strategy options tailored to their context. Trial registration: NCT05806840, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05806840 .</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"258-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using After Action Review to Identify Rapid Response Implementation Strategies for Emerging Drugs Among Youth.\",\"authors\":\"Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Suzanne Brown, Christina Holmes, Barry Schmidt, Eric Swihart, Tracy Robinson, Bo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving educators and researchers struggling to respond promptly. Widely adopted universal evidence-based interventions (EBIs), such as the Michigan Model for Health™ (MMH), and their delivery systems offer an opportunity to reach large youth populations and reduce the onset and escalation of emerging drug use trends. Tier 1 EBIs do not always reflect the most current needs of the context and population. Implementation strategies are needed to optimize EBIs and system responsiveness to emerging drugs. This study employs after action review (AAR) to examine past responses to emerging drugs and design implementation strategies for rapid responses. AAR centers on four key questions: (1) What was expected to happen? (2) What happened? (3) What went well? and (4) What can be improved? We collected qualitative data from 35 participants, including state education partners, school administrators, counselors, teachers, prevention specialists, and the state's health coordinator network. We used rapid qualitative and iterative inductive-deductive thematic analytic approaches. Data analysis revealed three central tenets for rapid responses: collaboration, readiness, and planning. We then identified implementation strategy core functions aligned with the central tenets and strategy form options (e.g., build/leverage a coalition) for each function to accommodate school-level heterogeneity. We created a systematic process to develop and deploy an implementation blueprint for building prevention infrastructure to enhance rapid responses for emerging drugs leveraging an existing intervention (MMH) and delivery system. AAR is a promising approach to identifying gaps and best practices in school-based responses to urgent drug crises. Our results indicate that while the core implementation strategy functions are constant, health coordinators benefit from strategy options tailored to their context. Trial registration: NCT05806840, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05806840 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"258-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年吸毒趋势变化迅速,教育工作者和研究人员难以及时作出反应。广泛采用的普遍循证干预措施(ebi),如密歇根卫生模式™(MMH)及其提供系统,为大量青年人口提供了机会,并减少新出现的吸毒趋势的发生和升级。一级ebi并不总是反映环境和人口的最新需求。需要实施策略来优化ebi和系统对新兴药物的响应。本研究采用行动后审查(AAR)来检查过去对新兴药物的反应,并设计快速反应的实施策略。AAR关注四个关键问题:(1)预期会发生什么?发生什么事了?(3)什么进展顺利?(4)有什么可以改进的?我们收集了35名参与者的定性数据,包括州教育合作伙伴、学校管理人员、辅导员、教师、预防专家和州健康协调员网络。我们使用快速定性和迭代的归纳演绎主题分析方法。数据分析揭示了快速反应的三个核心原则:协作、准备和计划。然后,我们确定了与中心原则和战略形式选项(例如,构建/利用联盟)相一致的实施战略核心功能,以适应每个功能的学校级别的异质性。我们创建了一个系统流程,以制定和部署建设预防基础设施的实施蓝图,以利用现有的干预措施(MMH)和输送系统加强对新兴药物的快速反应。AAR是一种很有希望的方法,可以在以学校为基础的紧急毒品危机应对中找出差距和最佳做法。我们的结果表明,虽然核心实施战略功能是不变的,但卫生协调员受益于根据其情况量身定制的战略选择。试验报名:NCT05806840, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05806840。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using After Action Review to Identify Rapid Response Implementation Strategies for Emerging Drugs Among Youth.

Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving educators and researchers struggling to respond promptly. Widely adopted universal evidence-based interventions (EBIs), such as the Michigan Model for Health™ (MMH), and their delivery systems offer an opportunity to reach large youth populations and reduce the onset and escalation of emerging drug use trends. Tier 1 EBIs do not always reflect the most current needs of the context and population. Implementation strategies are needed to optimize EBIs and system responsiveness to emerging drugs. This study employs after action review (AAR) to examine past responses to emerging drugs and design implementation strategies for rapid responses. AAR centers on four key questions: (1) What was expected to happen? (2) What happened? (3) What went well? and (4) What can be improved? We collected qualitative data from 35 participants, including state education partners, school administrators, counselors, teachers, prevention specialists, and the state's health coordinator network. We used rapid qualitative and iterative inductive-deductive thematic analytic approaches. Data analysis revealed three central tenets for rapid responses: collaboration, readiness, and planning. We then identified implementation strategy core functions aligned with the central tenets and strategy form options (e.g., build/leverage a coalition) for each function to accommodate school-level heterogeneity. We created a systematic process to develop and deploy an implementation blueprint for building prevention infrastructure to enhance rapid responses for emerging drugs leveraging an existing intervention (MMH) and delivery system. AAR is a promising approach to identifying gaps and best practices in school-based responses to urgent drug crises. Our results indicate that while the core implementation strategy functions are constant, health coordinators benefit from strategy options tailored to their context. Trial registration: NCT05806840, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05806840 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信