腰椎管狭窄患者Valsalva操作期间的马尾运动:引入一种新的冗余神经评估方法。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4
Ryo Yamakuni, Shiro Ishii, Koji Otani, Shinya Seino, Takuya Nikaido, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Masataka Nakamura, Takeyasu Kakamu, Hironobu Ishikawa, Hirofumi Sekino, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Ito
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄患者Valsalva操作期间的马尾运动:引入一种新的冗余神经评估方法。","authors":"Ryo Yamakuni, Shiro Ishii, Koji Otani, Shinya Seino, Takuya Nikaido, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Masataka Nakamura, Takeyasu Kakamu, Hironobu Ishikawa, Hirofumi Sekino, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Ito","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ<sup>2</sup> test). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have more severe stenosis than that of KAoRN-positive participants, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.182, Wilcoxon rank sum test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1873-1885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cauda equina movements during the Valsalva maneuver in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: introducing a novel method for redundant nerve evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Yamakuni, Shiro Ishii, Koji Otani, Shinya Seino, Takuya Nikaido, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Masataka Nakamura, Takeyasu Kakamu, Hironobu Ishikawa, Hirofumi Sekino, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ<sup>2</sup> test). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have more severe stenosis than that of KAoRN-positive participants, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.182, Wilcoxon rank sum test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1873-1885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨一种新的Valsalva机动电影MRI (cMRI)方案在腰椎管狭窄症患者中是否能观察到尺蠖样马尾运动。材料与方法:腰椎管狭窄症患者15例(男11例;平均年龄73.9岁)行腰椎静态MRI (sMRI)和矢状面60-s cMRI。cMRI方案,称为冗余神经的运动学评估(KAoRN),包括三个静息和Valsalva操作集。两名放射科医生使用MRI腰椎管狭窄评分独立评估马尾运动和腰椎管狭窄从L1/2到L5/S1的严重程度。两位分析师的得分取平均值;从所有级别中提取最严重的平均分数并将其定义为最差分数。此外,计算严重狭窄(平均评分≥3.5)的水平。结果:11例患者(73.3%)出现kaorn阳性马尾运动。kaorn阴性受试者的最严重腰椎管狭窄评分(4.0分,四分位数范围3.9-4.0分)往往高于kaorn阳性受试者(3.5分,四分位数范围3.0-4.0分)(p = 0.310, χ2检验)。kaorn阴性患者的狭窄程度往往比kaorn阳性患者更严重,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.182, Wilcoxon秩和检验)。结论:在腰椎管狭窄患者中经常观察到kaorn阳性的马尾运动;然而,并非在所有这些情况下都能观察到这一点。进一步探讨是否存在kaorn阳性结果的差异,可能为需要手术干预的临床相关LSS的诊断提供新的见解。试验注册:UMIN临床试验编号:UMIN000052276。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cauda equina movements during the Valsalva maneuver in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: introducing a novel method for redundant nerve evaluations.

Objective: To investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol.

Materials and methods: Fifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.

Results: KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ2 test). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have more severe stenosis than that of KAoRN-positive participants, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.182, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

Conclusion: KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention.

Trail registration: The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信