Mieke Koehoorn, Christopher B McLeod, Jonathan Fan, Victoria H Arrandale, Hugh W Davies, John M Dement, Manisha Pahwa, Cheryl E Peters, Leslie Stayner, Kurt Straif, Paul A Demers
{"title":"职业性石棉暴露与胃肠道癌症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mieke Koehoorn, Christopher B McLeod, Jonathan Fan, Victoria H Arrandale, Hugh W Davies, John M Dement, Manisha Pahwa, Cheryl E Peters, Leslie Stayner, Kurt Straif, Paul A Demers","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct meta-analyses of occupational asbestos exposure and oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer risk, including a critical exposure assessment approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was executed on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases (March 2022, March 2024). Effect estimates (ORs, HRs, standardised incidence ratio and standardised mortality ratio) from eligible cohort and case-control studies were combined in random effects models. Meta-relative risks (mRRs) were calculated by cancer site and exposure characteristics. Investigators with occupational epidemiology and hygiene expertise came to a consensus on the estimates where there was confidence in significant asbestos exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 (oesophageal), 153 (stomach) and 144 (colorectal) papers met the inclusion criteria. Elevated mRRs were observed for any occupational asbestos exposure for oesophageal (1.17 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29)), stomach (1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23)) and colorectal cancer (1.16 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.24)). There was consistency of mRR estimates and higher mRRs in meta-analyses where there was increased confidence in the categorisation of highly exposed workers, including among the highest exposed workers in exposure-response studies (oesophageal: 1.63 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.06); stomach: 1.28 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.52); colorectal: 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.53)), among asbestos insulation workers (oesophageal: 1.68 (95% 1.19 to 2.36); stomach: 1.53 (95% 0.93 to 2.51); colorectal: 1.59 (95% 1.14 to 2.23)) and among workers in cohorts with a twofold or greater risk of asbestos-related lung cancer (oesophageal: 1.40 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.71); stomach: 1.33 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.56); colorectal: 1.47 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.61)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analyses support a causal link between occupational asbestos exposure and the risk of oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"639-646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational asbestos exposure and gastrointestinal cancers: systematic review and meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Mieke Koehoorn, Christopher B McLeod, Jonathan Fan, Victoria H Arrandale, Hugh W Davies, John M Dement, Manisha Pahwa, Cheryl E Peters, Leslie Stayner, Kurt Straif, Paul A Demers\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2024-109707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct meta-analyses of occupational asbestos exposure and oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer risk, including a critical exposure assessment approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was executed on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases (March 2022, March 2024). Effect estimates (ORs, HRs, standardised incidence ratio and standardised mortality ratio) from eligible cohort and case-control studies were combined in random effects models. Meta-relative risks (mRRs) were calculated by cancer site and exposure characteristics. Investigators with occupational epidemiology and hygiene expertise came to a consensus on the estimates where there was confidence in significant asbestos exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 (oesophageal), 153 (stomach) and 144 (colorectal) papers met the inclusion criteria. Elevated mRRs were observed for any occupational asbestos exposure for oesophageal (1.17 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29)), stomach (1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23)) and colorectal cancer (1.16 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.24)). There was consistency of mRR estimates and higher mRRs in meta-analyses where there was increased confidence in the categorisation of highly exposed workers, including among the highest exposed workers in exposure-response studies (oesophageal: 1.63 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.06); stomach: 1.28 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.52); colorectal: 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.53)), among asbestos insulation workers (oesophageal: 1.68 (95% 1.19 to 2.36); stomach: 1.53 (95% 0.93 to 2.51); colorectal: 1.59 (95% 1.14 to 2.23)) and among workers in cohorts with a twofold or greater risk of asbestos-related lung cancer (oesophageal: 1.40 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.71); stomach: 1.33 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.56); colorectal: 1.47 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.61)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analyses support a causal link between occupational asbestos exposure and the risk of oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"639-646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109707\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:开展职业石棉暴露与食管癌、胃癌和结直肠癌风险的meta分析,包括一种关键暴露评估方法。方法:在MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science数据库(2022年3月、2024年3月)上执行检索策略。将符合条件的队列研究和病例对照研究的效应估计(ORs、hr、标准化发病率和标准化死亡率)合并到随机效应模型中。meta -相对危险度(mRRs)根据癌症部位和暴露特征计算。具有职业流行病学和卫生专业知识的调查人员就有信心大量接触石棉的估计达成了共识。结果:共有82篇(食管)、153篇(胃)、144篇(结直肠)论文符合纳入标准。食管癌(1.17 (95% CI 1.07 - 1.29))、胃癌(1.14 (95% CI 1.05 - 1.23))和结直肠癌(1.16 (95% CI 1.08 - 1.24))的任何职业性石棉暴露均观察到mrr升高。在荟萃分析中,高暴露工人分类的可信度增加,包括暴露反应研究中暴露程度最高的工人(食管癌:1.63 (95% CI 1.29至2.06);胃:1.28 (95% CI 1.09 ~ 1.52);结直肠:1.29例(95%可信区间1.09 - 1.53)),在石棉绝缘工人中(食管癌:1.68例(95%可信区间1.19 - 2.36);胃:1.53 (95% 0.93 ~ 2.51);结直肠癌:1.59(95% 1.14至2.23))和石棉相关肺癌两倍或更高风险队列中的工人(食道癌:1.40 (95% CI 1.14至1.71);胃:1.33 (95% CI 1.14 ~ 1.56);结直肠:1.47 (95% CI 1.34 - 1.61))。结论:荟萃分析支持职业石棉暴露与食管癌、胃癌和结直肠癌风险之间的因果关系。
Occupational asbestos exposure and gastrointestinal cancers: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Objective: To conduct meta-analyses of occupational asbestos exposure and oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer risk, including a critical exposure assessment approach.
Methods: The search strategy was executed on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases (March 2022, March 2024). Effect estimates (ORs, HRs, standardised incidence ratio and standardised mortality ratio) from eligible cohort and case-control studies were combined in random effects models. Meta-relative risks (mRRs) were calculated by cancer site and exposure characteristics. Investigators with occupational epidemiology and hygiene expertise came to a consensus on the estimates where there was confidence in significant asbestos exposure.
Results: A total of 82 (oesophageal), 153 (stomach) and 144 (colorectal) papers met the inclusion criteria. Elevated mRRs were observed for any occupational asbestos exposure for oesophageal (1.17 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29)), stomach (1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23)) and colorectal cancer (1.16 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.24)). There was consistency of mRR estimates and higher mRRs in meta-analyses where there was increased confidence in the categorisation of highly exposed workers, including among the highest exposed workers in exposure-response studies (oesophageal: 1.63 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.06); stomach: 1.28 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.52); colorectal: 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.53)), among asbestos insulation workers (oesophageal: 1.68 (95% 1.19 to 2.36); stomach: 1.53 (95% 0.93 to 2.51); colorectal: 1.59 (95% 1.14 to 2.23)) and among workers in cohorts with a twofold or greater risk of asbestos-related lung cancer (oesophageal: 1.40 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.71); stomach: 1.33 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.56); colorectal: 1.47 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.61)).
Conclusion: The meta-analyses support a causal link between occupational asbestos exposure and the risk of oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.