吉西他滨与卡介苗- guerin膀胱内治疗Treatment-Naïve低级别中危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004472
Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Sarah Attia, Willian Ito, Ivan Trevino, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan
{"title":"吉西他滨与卡介苗- guerin膀胱内治疗Treatment-Naïve低级别中危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌","authors":"Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Sarah Attia, Willian Ito, Ivan Trevino, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with intermediate-risk (IR) nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are recommended to receive induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, the comparison between gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in treatment-naïve patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC remains underexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine compared with BCG in a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC, classified according to International Bladder Cancer Group criteria, with no history of induction intravesical treatment. Patients received either induction intravesical BCG or gemcitabine. Recurrence was defined as histologically confirmed cancer during follow-up, while progression included stage/grade progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox analysis identified factors associated with recurrence and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients with IR-NMIBC, 78 received BCG and 73 received gemcitabine. Both groups completed the 6-week induction treatment at similar rates (100%), and maintenance therapy was administered to 47% of BCG-treated patients and 53% of gemcitabine-treated patients (<i>P</i> = .46). The median number of maintenance doses was 6 (IQR: 3-9) in the BCG group and 8 (IQR: 4-10) in the gemcitabine group (<i>P</i> = .83). Median follow-up was 54 months for patients receiving BCG and 36 months for patients receiving gemcitabine. After adjusting for age, International Bladder Cancer Group subgroups, year of treatment, single postoperative instillation, and maintenance therapy, gemcitabine was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared with BCG (<i>P</i> = .02), while the risk of progression remained similar between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = .87). Adverse events were observed in 62% of patients treated with BCG and 38% of patients treated with gemcitabine (<i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gemcitabine is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than BCG in treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC. However, both treatments show comparable efficacy in preventing disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"730-738"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gemcitabine vs Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Intravesical Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Sarah Attia, Willian Ito, Ivan Trevino, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with intermediate-risk (IR) nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are recommended to receive induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, the comparison between gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in treatment-naïve patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC remains underexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine compared with BCG in a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC, classified according to International Bladder Cancer Group criteria, with no history of induction intravesical treatment. Patients received either induction intravesical BCG or gemcitabine. Recurrence was defined as histologically confirmed cancer during follow-up, while progression included stage/grade progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox analysis identified factors associated with recurrence and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients with IR-NMIBC, 78 received BCG and 73 received gemcitabine. Both groups completed the 6-week induction treatment at similar rates (100%), and maintenance therapy was administered to 47% of BCG-treated patients and 53% of gemcitabine-treated patients (<i>P</i> = .46). The median number of maintenance doses was 6 (IQR: 3-9) in the BCG group and 8 (IQR: 4-10) in the gemcitabine group (<i>P</i> = .83). Median follow-up was 54 months for patients receiving BCG and 36 months for patients receiving gemcitabine. After adjusting for age, International Bladder Cancer Group subgroups, year of treatment, single postoperative instillation, and maintenance therapy, gemcitabine was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared with BCG (<i>P</i> = .02), while the risk of progression remained similar between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = .87). Adverse events were observed in 62% of patients treated with BCG and 38% of patients treated with gemcitabine (<i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gemcitabine is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than BCG in treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC. However, both treatments show comparable efficacy in preventing disease progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"730-738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:推荐中危(IR)非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者接受诱导膀胱化疗或免疫治疗。然而,吉西他滨和卡介苗在初次治疗的低级别IR-NMIBC患者中的比较仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估吉西他滨与卡介苗在一组初治IR-NMIBC患者中的疗效。材料与方法:回顾性分析低级别IR-NMIBC患者,按照国际膀胱癌组织标准分类,既往无诱导膀胱内治疗史。患者接受诱导膀胱内BCG或吉西他滨。复发定义为随访期间组织学证实的癌症,而进展包括分期/分级进展。Kaplan-Meier估计用于生存分析,多变量Cox分析确定了与复发和进展相关的因素。结果:151例IR-NMIBC患者中,78例接受卡介苗治疗,73例接受吉西他滨治疗。两组以相似的比率(100%)完成了6周的诱导治疗,47%的BCG患者和53%的吉西他滨患者接受了维持治疗(p = 0.46)。BCG组维持剂量中位数为6 (IQR: 3-9),吉西他滨组维持剂量中位数为8 (IQR: 4-10) (p = 0.83)。接受卡介苗治疗的患者中位随访时间为54个月,接受吉西他滨治疗的患者中位随访时间为36个月。在调整了年龄、IBCG亚组、治疗时间、术后单次滴注和维持治疗等因素后,吉西他滨与BCG相比具有更高的复发风险(p=0.02),而两组之间的进展风险保持相似(p= 0.87)。62%的卡介苗治疗组和38%的吉西他滨治疗组出现不良事件(p = 0.02)。结论:在treatment-naïve IR-NMIBC患者中,吉西他滨的复发风险高于卡介苗。然而,两种治疗方法在预防疾病进展方面显示出相当的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gemcitabine vs Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Intravesical Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Purpose: Patients with intermediate-risk (IR) nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are recommended to receive induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, the comparison between gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in treatment-naïve patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC remains underexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine compared with BCG in a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with low-grade IR-NMIBC, classified according to International Bladder Cancer Group criteria, with no history of induction intravesical treatment. Patients received either induction intravesical BCG or gemcitabine. Recurrence was defined as histologically confirmed cancer during follow-up, while progression included stage/grade progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox analysis identified factors associated with recurrence and progression.

Results: Of the 151 patients with IR-NMIBC, 78 received BCG and 73 received gemcitabine. Both groups completed the 6-week induction treatment at similar rates (100%), and maintenance therapy was administered to 47% of BCG-treated patients and 53% of gemcitabine-treated patients (P = .46). The median number of maintenance doses was 6 (IQR: 3-9) in the BCG group and 8 (IQR: 4-10) in the gemcitabine group (P = .83). Median follow-up was 54 months for patients receiving BCG and 36 months for patients receiving gemcitabine. After adjusting for age, International Bladder Cancer Group subgroups, year of treatment, single postoperative instillation, and maintenance therapy, gemcitabine was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared with BCG (P = .02), while the risk of progression remained similar between the 2 groups (P = .87). Adverse events were observed in 62% of patients treated with BCG and 38% of patients treated with gemcitabine (P = .02).

Conclusions: Gemcitabine is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than BCG in treatment-naïve patients with IR-NMIBC. However, both treatments show comparable efficacy in preventing disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信