用于治疗上呼吸道感染的非甾体抗炎药的相对有效性和胃肠道安全性:一项初级保健的探索性队列研究

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Alberto Magni, Pierangelo Lora Aprile, Erik Lagolio, Ignazio Grattagliano, Diego Fornasari, Alessandro Rossi, Claudio Cricelli
{"title":"用于治疗上呼吸道感染的非甾体抗炎药的相对有效性和胃肠道安全性:一项初级保健的探索性队列研究","authors":"Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Alberto Magni, Pierangelo Lora Aprile, Erik Lagolio, Ignazio Grattagliano, Diego Fornasari, Alessandro Rossi, Claudio Cricelli","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01878-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prescribed to control pain, inflammation, and fever in upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the relative effectiveness and gastrointestinal (GI)-related safety of individual NSAIDs to control symptoms of URTIs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an Italian primary care data source, we identified patients aged ≥ 15 years who were newly prescribed NSAIDs for URTIs between 2013 and 2022. Switching to another NSAID for the same indication within the 30-day follow-up was a proxy for drug effectiveness. The study outcome for GI safety analysis was upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 57,971 patients, the most prevalent subgroups were those treated with ketoprofen (39.5%) and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen (22.4%). Ketoprofen showed the lowest rate of switching to another NSAID [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83)] against acetylsalicylic acid/coxibs/diclofenac. Dexibuprofen/ibuprofen showed similar results [HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22-1.10)], with no significant association. Ketoprofen and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen were prescribed as lysine and arginine salts in 85 and 6% of URTIs sufferers, respectively. Across NSAIDs, we did not find any significant difference in the risk of UGIB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicated that various NSAIDs may exhibit differing levels of effectiveness in treating URTIs, particularly those formulated for quick onset of action. No NSAIDs-UGIBs association was found. Further prospective, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative effectiveness and gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs being prescribed for upper respiratory tract infections: an explorative cohort study in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Lapi, Ettore Marconi, Alberto Magni, Pierangelo Lora Aprile, Erik Lagolio, Ignazio Grattagliano, Diego Fornasari, Alessandro Rossi, Claudio Cricelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-01878-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prescribed to control pain, inflammation, and fever in upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the relative effectiveness and gastrointestinal (GI)-related safety of individual NSAIDs to control symptoms of URTIs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using an Italian primary care data source, we identified patients aged ≥ 15 years who were newly prescribed NSAIDs for URTIs between 2013 and 2022. Switching to another NSAID for the same indication within the 30-day follow-up was a proxy for drug effectiveness. The study outcome for GI safety analysis was upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 57,971 patients, the most prevalent subgroups were those treated with ketoprofen (39.5%) and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen (22.4%). Ketoprofen showed the lowest rate of switching to another NSAID [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83)] against acetylsalicylic acid/coxibs/diclofenac. Dexibuprofen/ibuprofen showed similar results [HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22-1.10)], with no significant association. Ketoprofen and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen were prescribed as lysine and arginine salts in 85 and 6% of URTIs sufferers, respectively. Across NSAIDs, we did not find any significant difference in the risk of UGIB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicated that various NSAIDs may exhibit differing levels of effectiveness in treating URTIs, particularly those formulated for quick onset of action. No NSAIDs-UGIBs association was found. Further prospective, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01878-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01878-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)用于控制上呼吸道感染(URTIs)的疼痛、炎症和发烧。目的:探讨单药非甾体抗炎药控制尿路感染症状的相对有效性和胃肠道相关安全性。方法:使用意大利初级保健数据来源,我们确定了2013年至2022年期间新开非甾体抗炎药治疗尿路感染的年龄≥15岁的患者。在30天的随访中,为同一适应症改用另一种非甾体抗炎药是药物有效性的代表。GI安全性分析的研究结果为上消化道出血(UGIB)。结果:在57,971例患者队列中,最常见的亚组是接受酮洛芬(39.5%)和德西布洛芬/布洛芬(22.4%)治疗的患者。与乙酰水杨酸/coxibs/双氯芬酸相比,酮洛芬改用另一种非甾体抗炎药的比例最低[风险比(HR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83)]。德西布洛芬/布洛芬结果相似[HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22-1.10)],无显著相关性。在85%和6%的尿路感染患者中,酮洛芬和地苯布洛芬/布洛芬分别被处方为赖氨酸和精氨酸盐。在非甾体抗炎药中,我们没有发现UGIB风险有任何显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,不同的非甾体抗炎药在治疗尿路感染方面可能表现出不同程度的有效性,特别是那些为快速起效而配制的药物。未发现非甾体抗炎药与ugibs的关联。需要进一步的前瞻性、更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative effectiveness and gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs being prescribed for upper respiratory tract infections: an explorative cohort study in primary care.

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prescribed to control pain, inflammation, and fever in upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).

Aim: To explore the relative effectiveness and gastrointestinal (GI)-related safety of individual NSAIDs to control symptoms of URTIs.

Method: Using an Italian primary care data source, we identified patients aged ≥ 15 years who were newly prescribed NSAIDs for URTIs between 2013 and 2022. Switching to another NSAID for the same indication within the 30-day follow-up was a proxy for drug effectiveness. The study outcome for GI safety analysis was upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

Results: In a cohort of 57,971 patients, the most prevalent subgroups were those treated with ketoprofen (39.5%) and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen (22.4%). Ketoprofen showed the lowest rate of switching to another NSAID [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83)] against acetylsalicylic acid/coxibs/diclofenac. Dexibuprofen/ibuprofen showed similar results [HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22-1.10)], with no significant association. Ketoprofen and dexibuprofen/ibuprofen were prescribed as lysine and arginine salts in 85 and 6% of URTIs sufferers, respectively. Across NSAIDs, we did not find any significant difference in the risk of UGIB.

Conclusion: Our findings indicated that various NSAIDs may exhibit differing levels of effectiveness in treating URTIs, particularly those formulated for quick onset of action. No NSAIDs-UGIBs association was found. Further prospective, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信