Sarah Wilkes, Laura Kalfsvel, Floor van Rosse, Jorie Versmissen, Hugo van der Kuy, Rianne Zaal
{"title":"专科医院药剂师或替代医院药剂师建议后处方错误的解决率:一项回顾性横断面研究。","authors":"Sarah Wilkes, Laura Kalfsvel, Floor van Rosse, Jorie Versmissen, Hugo van der Kuy, Rianne Zaal","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Specialised hospital pharmacists, integrated in medical teams on the ward, can improve medication safety. When a specialised hospital pharmacist is temporarily not available, the pharmaceutical care will be conducted by a substitute hospital pharmacist with less specific knowledge about that patient population. Our objective was to compare the resolution rate of prescribing errors between specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes. Furthermore, we investigated whether other characteristics of the pharmacists, the prescriber, patient, drug or intervention itself were associated with the resolution rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the resolution of prescribing errors, based on the analysis of electronic prescriptions. A prescribing error was defined as an alert that required intervention of the pharmacist to prevent harm or to optimise therapy. To identify prescribing errors, a medical doctor and hospital pharmacist analysed all alerts that were retained to be checked by a pharmacist. Resolution of a prescribing error was defined as resolution of the error within 24 hours after detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 145 574 medication prescriptions were analysed and 448 prescribing errors were detected. Of these prescribing errors, 94.0% were resolved within 24 hours. No differences were found between the resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes (94.4% vs 91.9%, p=0145 (χ<sup>2</sup> test)). Administrative prescribing errors, prescribing errors for patients aged >80 years and prescribing errors handled during weekends showed a relatively low-resolution rate. No other characteristics of the pharmacist, prescriber, patient, the drug involved or the intervention itself were associated with the resolution of the prescribing error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the temporarily absence of a specialised hospital pharmacist, the resolution rate of prescribing errors remains high when advice about prescribing errors is provided by a substitute hospital pharmacist.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacist or a substitute hospital pharmacist: a retrospective cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Wilkes, Laura Kalfsvel, Floor van Rosse, Jorie Versmissen, Hugo van der Kuy, Rianne Zaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Specialised hospital pharmacists, integrated in medical teams on the ward, can improve medication safety. When a specialised hospital pharmacist is temporarily not available, the pharmaceutical care will be conducted by a substitute hospital pharmacist with less specific knowledge about that patient population. Our objective was to compare the resolution rate of prescribing errors between specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes. Furthermore, we investigated whether other characteristics of the pharmacists, the prescriber, patient, drug or intervention itself were associated with the resolution rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the resolution of prescribing errors, based on the analysis of electronic prescriptions. A prescribing error was defined as an alert that required intervention of the pharmacist to prevent harm or to optimise therapy. To identify prescribing errors, a medical doctor and hospital pharmacist analysed all alerts that were retained to be checked by a pharmacist. Resolution of a prescribing error was defined as resolution of the error within 24 hours after detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 145 574 medication prescriptions were analysed and 448 prescribing errors were detected. Of these prescribing errors, 94.0% were resolved within 24 hours. No differences were found between the resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes (94.4% vs 91.9%, p=0145 (χ<sup>2</sup> test)). Administrative prescribing errors, prescribing errors for patients aged >80 years and prescribing errors handled during weekends showed a relatively low-resolution rate. No other characteristics of the pharmacist, prescriber, patient, the drug involved or the intervention itself were associated with the resolution of the prescribing error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the temporarily absence of a specialised hospital pharmacist, the resolution rate of prescribing errors remains high when advice about prescribing errors is provided by a substitute hospital pharmacist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:医院专科药师融入病房医疗队,提高用药安全。当专科医院的药剂师暂时不可用时,药学护理将由对该患者群体了解较少的替代医院药剂师进行。我们的目的是比较专科医院药剂师和他们的替代人员之间处方错误的解决率。此外,我们还调查了药剂师、开处方者、患者、药物或干预本身的其他特征是否与解决率有关。方法:在分析电子处方的基础上,进行回顾性横断面研究,评估处方错误的解决方案。处方错误被定义为需要药剂师干预以防止伤害或优化治疗的警报。为了确定处方错误,医生和医院药剂师分析了保留供药剂师检查的所有警报。处方错误的解决定义为在检测后24小时内解决错误。结果:共分析处方14574张,检出处方错误448张。在这些处方错误中,94.0%在24小时内得到解决。专科医院药师建议后的处方错误解决率与替代药师建议后的处方错误解决率无差异(94.4% vs 91.9%, p=0145, χ2检验)。行政处方错误、80 ~ 80岁患者处方错误和周末处理处方错误的解决率相对较低。药剂师、开处方者、患者、所涉药物或干预本身的其他特征与处方错误的解决无关。结论:在医院专科药师暂时缺位的情况下,由医院替代药师提供处方错误建议,处方错误的解决率仍然较高。
Resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacist or a substitute hospital pharmacist: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Objectives: Specialised hospital pharmacists, integrated in medical teams on the ward, can improve medication safety. When a specialised hospital pharmacist is temporarily not available, the pharmaceutical care will be conducted by a substitute hospital pharmacist with less specific knowledge about that patient population. Our objective was to compare the resolution rate of prescribing errors between specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes. Furthermore, we investigated whether other characteristics of the pharmacists, the prescriber, patient, drug or intervention itself were associated with the resolution rate.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the resolution of prescribing errors, based on the analysis of electronic prescriptions. A prescribing error was defined as an alert that required intervention of the pharmacist to prevent harm or to optimise therapy. To identify prescribing errors, a medical doctor and hospital pharmacist analysed all alerts that were retained to be checked by a pharmacist. Resolution of a prescribing error was defined as resolution of the error within 24 hours after detection.
Results: In total, 145 574 medication prescriptions were analysed and 448 prescribing errors were detected. Of these prescribing errors, 94.0% were resolved within 24 hours. No differences were found between the resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes (94.4% vs 91.9%, p=0145 (χ2 test)). Administrative prescribing errors, prescribing errors for patients aged >80 years and prescribing errors handled during weekends showed a relatively low-resolution rate. No other characteristics of the pharmacist, prescriber, patient, the drug involved or the intervention itself were associated with the resolution of the prescribing error.
Conclusions: In the temporarily absence of a specialised hospital pharmacist, the resolution rate of prescribing errors remains high when advice about prescribing errors is provided by a substitute hospital pharmacist.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide.
EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.