急诊阿片类药物处方对健康结果的影响。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jake Hayward, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Andrew D McRae, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Kathryn Dong, Robert Tanguay, Lori Montgomery, Andrew Huang, Grant Innes
{"title":"急诊阿片类药物处方对健康结果的影响。","authors":"Jake Hayward, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Andrew D McRae, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Kathryn Dong, Robert Tanguay, Lori Montgomery, Andrew Huang, Grant Innes","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.241542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relation between emergency department opioid prescribing and subsequent harm is complex and poorly studied. We sought to quantify adverse outcomes, incremental risk, and rates of prolonged opioid use among emergency department patients receiving an opioid prescription and propensity-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used administrative data to sample all Alberta emergency department visits over 10 years, excluding patients with cancer, palliative care, or concurrent opioid use. Treated patients filled an opioid prescription within 72 hours after their index visit; untreated patients did not. We generated propensity scores to identify matched controls among untreated patients. The 1-year primary composite outcome included opioid-related emergency visits (e.g., overdoses), new opioid agonist therapy, all-cause hospital admission, or death. The secondary outcome was prolonged opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 13 028 575 eligible visits, 689 074 patients (5.3%) filled an opioid prescription. The mean age was 43.9 years, and 49.8% of patients were female. Most were high-acuity patients with traumatic, gastrointestinal-genitourinary, or musculoskeletal complaints. Patients who received opioids experienced 1.4% more primary outcome events (17.1% v. 15.7%), driven by all-cause hospital admissions (16.4% v. 15.1%; number needed to harm [NNH] = 53) and prolonged opioid use (4.5% v. 3.3%; NNH = 59). Opioid-related visits, new opioid agonist treatment, and mortality were unaffected. Incremental risk was low for patients with documented mental health conditions or substance use, and was highest for opioid-naive patients, older patients, and males.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Emergency department opioid prescriptions were associated with small increases in subsequent opioid prescription use and hospital admission, particularly in older and opioid-naive patients, and males; they were not associated with overdoses, new opioid agonist therapy, or mortality. Physicians should understand patient-specific incremental risks when prescribing opioids for acute pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":"197 5","pages":"E122-E130"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of emergency department opioid prescribing on health outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jake Hayward, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Andrew D McRae, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Kathryn Dong, Robert Tanguay, Lori Montgomery, Andrew Huang, Grant Innes\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cmaj.241542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relation between emergency department opioid prescribing and subsequent harm is complex and poorly studied. We sought to quantify adverse outcomes, incremental risk, and rates of prolonged opioid use among emergency department patients receiving an opioid prescription and propensity-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used administrative data to sample all Alberta emergency department visits over 10 years, excluding patients with cancer, palliative care, or concurrent opioid use. Treated patients filled an opioid prescription within 72 hours after their index visit; untreated patients did not. We generated propensity scores to identify matched controls among untreated patients. The 1-year primary composite outcome included opioid-related emergency visits (e.g., overdoses), new opioid agonist therapy, all-cause hospital admission, or death. The secondary outcome was prolonged opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 13 028 575 eligible visits, 689 074 patients (5.3%) filled an opioid prescription. The mean age was 43.9 years, and 49.8% of patients were female. Most were high-acuity patients with traumatic, gastrointestinal-genitourinary, or musculoskeletal complaints. Patients who received opioids experienced 1.4% more primary outcome events (17.1% v. 15.7%), driven by all-cause hospital admissions (16.4% v. 15.1%; number needed to harm [NNH] = 53) and prolonged opioid use (4.5% v. 3.3%; NNH = 59). Opioid-related visits, new opioid agonist treatment, and mortality were unaffected. Incremental risk was low for patients with documented mental health conditions or substance use, and was highest for opioid-naive patients, older patients, and males.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Emergency department opioid prescriptions were associated with small increases in subsequent opioid prescription use and hospital admission, particularly in older and opioid-naive patients, and males; they were not associated with overdoses, new opioid agonist therapy, or mortality. Physicians should understand patient-specific incremental risks when prescribing opioids for acute pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"volume\":\"197 5\",\"pages\":\"E122-E130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.241542\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.241542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科阿片类药物处方与后续危害之间的关系复杂且研究较少。我们试图量化急诊科接受阿片类药物处方和倾向匹配对照的患者的不良后果、增量风险和长期阿片类药物使用率。方法:我们使用管理数据对艾伯塔省10年来所有急诊科就诊进行抽样,排除癌症、姑息治疗或同时使用阿片类药物的患者。接受治疗的患者在首次就诊后72小时内服用阿片类药物;未经治疗的患者则没有。我们生成倾向评分,以在未治疗的患者中识别匹配的对照。1年的主要综合结局包括阿片类药物相关的急诊就诊(例如,过量用药)、新的阿片类药物激动剂治疗、全因住院或死亡。次要结局是阿片类药物使用时间延长。结果:在13 028 575次符合条件的就诊后,689 074名患者(5.3%)服用了阿片类药物处方。平均年龄43.9岁,女性占49.8%。大多数是创伤性、胃肠道-泌尿生殖系统或肌肉骨骼疾病的高敏度患者。接受阿片类药物治疗的患者主要结局事件多1.4% (17.1% vs 15.7%),原因是全因住院(16.4% vs 15.1%;所需伤害数[NNH] = 53)和阿片类药物使用时间延长(4.5% vs . 3.3%;NNH = 59)。阿片类药物相关就诊、新的阿片类药物激动剂治疗和死亡率均未受影响。有精神健康状况或药物使用记录的患者的增量风险较低,而阿片类药物初始患者、老年患者和男性的增量风险最高。解释:急诊科阿片类药物处方与随后阿片类药物处方使用和住院率的小幅增加有关,特别是在老年和阿片类药物新手患者以及男性中;它们与过量用药、新的阿片类激动剂治疗或死亡率无关。医生在处方阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛时,应了解患者特有的增量风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of emergency department opioid prescribing on health outcomes.

Background: The relation between emergency department opioid prescribing and subsequent harm is complex and poorly studied. We sought to quantify adverse outcomes, incremental risk, and rates of prolonged opioid use among emergency department patients receiving an opioid prescription and propensity-matched controls.

Methods: We used administrative data to sample all Alberta emergency department visits over 10 years, excluding patients with cancer, palliative care, or concurrent opioid use. Treated patients filled an opioid prescription within 72 hours after their index visit; untreated patients did not. We generated propensity scores to identify matched controls among untreated patients. The 1-year primary composite outcome included opioid-related emergency visits (e.g., overdoses), new opioid agonist therapy, all-cause hospital admission, or death. The secondary outcome was prolonged opioid use.

Results: After 13 028 575 eligible visits, 689 074 patients (5.3%) filled an opioid prescription. The mean age was 43.9 years, and 49.8% of patients were female. Most were high-acuity patients with traumatic, gastrointestinal-genitourinary, or musculoskeletal complaints. Patients who received opioids experienced 1.4% more primary outcome events (17.1% v. 15.7%), driven by all-cause hospital admissions (16.4% v. 15.1%; number needed to harm [NNH] = 53) and prolonged opioid use (4.5% v. 3.3%; NNH = 59). Opioid-related visits, new opioid agonist treatment, and mortality were unaffected. Incremental risk was low for patients with documented mental health conditions or substance use, and was highest for opioid-naive patients, older patients, and males.

Interpretation: Emergency department opioid prescriptions were associated with small increases in subsequent opioid prescription use and hospital admission, particularly in older and opioid-naive patients, and males; they were not associated with overdoses, new opioid agonist therapy, or mortality. Physicians should understand patient-specific incremental risks when prescribing opioids for acute pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信