乳腺x线摄影BI-RADS分布分析及随访超声评估:一项单中心研究。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S481201
Burak Kankaya, Suleyman Buyukasik, Yusuf Emre Altundal, Feyza Sonmez Topcu, Paria Rahmanbakhsh, Ayden Etemad, Selin Kapan, Halil Alis
{"title":"乳腺x线摄影BI-RADS分布分析及随访超声评估:一项单中心研究。","authors":"Burak Kankaya, Suleyman Buyukasik, Yusuf Emre Altundal, Feyza Sonmez Topcu, Paria Rahmanbakhsh, Ayden Etemad, Selin Kapan, Halil Alis","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S481201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended follow-up ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Burak Kankaya, Suleyman Buyukasik, Yusuf Emre Altundal, Feyza Sonmez Topcu, Paria Rahmanbakhsh, Ayden Etemad, Selin Kapan, Halil Alis\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S481201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended follow-up ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S481201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S481201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究有三个主要目的:1)评估接受筛查性乳房x光检查的土耳其妇女队列中乳房成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类的分布,2)分析推荐的随访超声(US)检查的频率和未完成率,3)检查完成随访超声检查的结果。我们的目标是通过分析BI-RADS分类、随访完成率和完成超声检查的结果来评估当前乳腺癌筛查过程中的潜在差距。患者和方法:本回顾性研究分析了2020-2022年在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的伊斯坦布尔艾丁大学普外科诊所接受乳房x光筛查的1761名土耳其妇女。我们评估了BI-RADS分类的分布,分析了推荐随访US的频率和未完成率,并检查了完成随访US检查的结果。采用卡方独立性检验和Spearman秩相关检验对数据进行分析。结果:我们的研究揭示了三个关键发现:1)超过一半(55.9%)的乳房x线照片被归类为BI-RADS 0,需要进一步成像。2)近三分之一推荐US检查的患者(31.91%)没有完成推荐的随访超声预约。3)在完成随访超声检查的患者中,近三分之一(29.7%)的BI-RADS重分类为3级及以上。值得注意的是,2.3% (n=18)被划分为BI-RADS 4或5级,表明发现可疑为恶性肿瘤。结论:我们的研究结果强调了随访美国在乳腺癌筛查中的重要作用。使用乳房x光检查进行BI-RADS 0初始分类的高比率,加上随访美国检查的显著不完成率,特别是在老年群体中,突出了当前筛查过程中的潜在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.

Purpose: Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data.

Results: Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended follow-up ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信