影响 FACE-Q 美学结果的患者因素:探索性横截面回归分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen
{"title":"影响 FACE-Q 美学结果的患者因素:探索性横截面回归分析。","authors":"Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and nonsurgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetics scale scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older, who had undergone noninvasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year, were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (P < .05) with higher scores, including lower BMI, African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin Type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of previous aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Regression Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Gallo, Isabella Churchill, Patrick Kim, Charlene Rae, Sophocles H Voineskos, Achilles Thoma, Andrea L Pusic, Stefan J Cano, Anne F Klassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and nonsurgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetics scale scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older, who had undergone noninvasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year, were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (P < .05) with higher scores, including lower BMI, African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin Type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of previous aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:FACE-Q美学是一种经过验证的工具,用于评估患者报告的与手术和非手术面部美学治疗相关的结果。识别可能影响FACE-Q评分的患者特异性变量对于控制研究中潜在的混杂因素至关重要。目的:本研究旨在确定预测FACE-Q审美量表得分的因素。方法:在通过多产平台招募的国际队列参与者中进行横断面调查。年龄在20岁或以上的参与者在过去一年内接受过非侵入性面部美容手术。收集人口学和临床信息,采用单变量和多变量线性回归分析评估Face - q Face总体、心理和社会量表得分的预测因子。结果:共分析1259名参与者,平均年龄42.6岁(±11.9岁)。面部整体量表的平均得分为52.4(±18.3)分,心理量表的平均得分为56.5(±23.7)分,社会量表的平均得分为62.7(±24.0)分。有几个因素与较高的评分显著相关(p < 0.05),包括较低的身体质量指数(BMI)、非裔美国人种族、男性性别、菲茨帕特里克皮肤V型、在美国居住、经济稳定和先前美容治疗的残余效果。年轻的参与者更有可能报告更高的面部整体得分(结论:本研究确定了几个预测面部整体,心理和社会量表得分的患者特征。这些发现为了解患者特定因素如何影响面部美容手术后的结果提供了有价值的见解,并强调了在使用FACE-Q美学工具的未来研究中考虑这些变量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Regression Analysis.

Background: The FACE-Q Aesthetics is a validated tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes related to surgical and nonsurgical facial aesthetic treatments. Recognizing patient-specific variables that may influence FACE-Q scores is essential to control for potential confounders in research.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that predict FACE-Q Aesthetics scale scores.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among an international cohort of participants recruited through the Prolific platform. Participants aged 20 years or older, who had undergone noninvasive facial aesthetic procedures within the past year, were included. Demographic and clinical information was collected, and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess predictors of FACE-Q Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores.

Results: A total of 1259 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 42.6 years (±11.9). The mean scores were 52.4 (±18.3) for the Face Overall scale, 56.5 (±23.7) for the Psychological scale, and 62.7 (±24.0) for the Social scale. Several factors were significantly associated (P < .05) with higher scores, including lower BMI, African American ethnicity, male gender, Fitzpatrick skin Type V, residence in the United States, financial stability, and residual effects of previous aesthetic treatments. Younger participants were more likely to report higher Face Overall scores (P < .05).

Conclusions: This study identified several patient characteristics that predict Face Overall, Psychological, and Social scale scores. These findings offer valuable insights into how patient-specific factors influence outcomes following facial aesthetic procedures and underscore the need to account for these variables in future research using the FACE-Q Aesthetics tool.

Level of evidence: 3:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信