Jabeen Taiba, Cheryl Beseler, Muhammad Zahid, Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, Alan Kolok, Eleanor Rogan
{"title":"探索农业化学混合物与小儿癌症之间的共同联系","authors":"Jabeen Taiba, Cheryl Beseler, Muhammad Zahid, Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, Alan Kolok, Eleanor Rogan","doi":"10.1029/2024GH001236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nebraska's age-adjusted incidence rates for childhood cancers are among the highest in the US. Previous studies indicated associations between agrichemical exposures (atrazine and nitrates) and pediatric cancer rate, assuming single pollutant exposure. We evaluated the joint association between the agricultural mixture and pediatric cancer. Agrichemical exposures at a county scale were quantified using the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project for frequently applied pesticides from 1992 to 2014 in 93 Nebraska counties. Outcomes were quantified using pediatric cancer diagnosed among children <20 years of age (1992–2014) from the Nebraska cancer registry. We adjusted for social vulnerability factors such as race, income, employment, and access to care. The associations between 32 agrichemicals and cancer subtypes were assessed using the Generalized Weighted Quantile Sum Regression (gWQS) model. The model was fit assuming a Poisson distribution and using the pediatric population as an offset-term and social vulnerability factors as covariates. We observed a statistically significant positive association between the 32 agrichemicals and overall pediatric cancer and subtypes. The strength of associations was slightly stronger among brain and CNS cancers (<i>β</i> = 0.36, CI = 0.14, 0.57) compared to overall cancer (<i>β</i> = 0.30, CI = 0.16, 0.44) and leukemia (<i>β</i> = 0.23, CI = 0.09, 0.38). Dicamba, glyphosate, paraquat, quizalofop, triasulfuron, and tefluthrin largely contributed to the joint association. These findings may explain the joint associations of the agrichemical mixture on childhood cancer. Alternative biomarker-based approaches to measuring human exposure are worth investigating for chemicals of concern, particularly in counties with high agrichemical and cancer rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GH001236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Joint Association Between Agrichemical Mixtures and Pediatric Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jabeen Taiba, Cheryl Beseler, Muhammad Zahid, Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, Alan Kolok, Eleanor Rogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GH001236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nebraska's age-adjusted incidence rates for childhood cancers are among the highest in the US. Previous studies indicated associations between agrichemical exposures (atrazine and nitrates) and pediatric cancer rate, assuming single pollutant exposure. We evaluated the joint association between the agricultural mixture and pediatric cancer. Agrichemical exposures at a county scale were quantified using the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project for frequently applied pesticides from 1992 to 2014 in 93 Nebraska counties. Outcomes were quantified using pediatric cancer diagnosed among children <20 years of age (1992–2014) from the Nebraska cancer registry. We adjusted for social vulnerability factors such as race, income, employment, and access to care. The associations between 32 agrichemicals and cancer subtypes were assessed using the Generalized Weighted Quantile Sum Regression (gWQS) model. The model was fit assuming a Poisson distribution and using the pediatric population as an offset-term and social vulnerability factors as covariates. We observed a statistically significant positive association between the 32 agrichemicals and overall pediatric cancer and subtypes. The strength of associations was slightly stronger among brain and CNS cancers (<i>β</i> = 0.36, CI = 0.14, 0.57) compared to overall cancer (<i>β</i> = 0.30, CI = 0.16, 0.44) and leukemia (<i>β</i> = 0.23, CI = 0.09, 0.38). Dicamba, glyphosate, paraquat, quizalofop, triasulfuron, and tefluthrin largely contributed to the joint association. These findings may explain the joint associations of the agrichemical mixture on childhood cancer. Alternative biomarker-based approaches to measuring human exposure are worth investigating for chemicals of concern, particularly in counties with high agrichemical and cancer rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohealth\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GH001236\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
内布拉斯加州儿童癌症的年龄调整发病率是美国最高的。先前的研究表明,假设单一污染物暴露,农药暴露(阿特拉津和硝酸盐)与儿童癌症发病率之间存在关联。我们评估了农业混合物与儿童癌症之间的联合关系。利用美国地质勘测局的农药国家合成项目,对1992年至2014年内布拉斯加州93个县的常用农药进行了县尺度的农药暴露量化。使用内布拉斯加州癌症登记处20岁儿童(1992-2014)中诊断出的儿童癌症对结果进行量化。我们调整了社会脆弱性因素,如种族、收入、就业和获得医疗服务的机会。采用广义加权分位数和回归(gWQS)模型评估了32种农药与癌症亚型之间的关系。模型采用泊松分布,以儿童人口为补偿项,以社会脆弱性因素为协变量进行拟合。我们观察到32种农药与儿童癌症及其亚型之间存在统计学上显著的正相关。与总体癌症(β = 0.30, CI = 0.16, 0.44)和白血病(β = 0.23, CI = 0.09, 0.38)相比,脑癌和中枢神经系统癌(β = 0.36, CI = 0.14, 0.57)的相关性略强。麦草畏、草甘膦、百草枯、灭螨灵、三磺隆和氟氰菊酯在很大程度上促成了这一联合协会。这些发现可以解释农化混合物与儿童癌症的联合关联。基于生物标记物的替代测量人类暴露的方法值得对关注的化学品进行研究,特别是在农业化学品和癌症发病率高的县。
Exploring the Joint Association Between Agrichemical Mixtures and Pediatric Cancer
Nebraska's age-adjusted incidence rates for childhood cancers are among the highest in the US. Previous studies indicated associations between agrichemical exposures (atrazine and nitrates) and pediatric cancer rate, assuming single pollutant exposure. We evaluated the joint association between the agricultural mixture and pediatric cancer. Agrichemical exposures at a county scale were quantified using the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project for frequently applied pesticides from 1992 to 2014 in 93 Nebraska counties. Outcomes were quantified using pediatric cancer diagnosed among children <20 years of age (1992–2014) from the Nebraska cancer registry. We adjusted for social vulnerability factors such as race, income, employment, and access to care. The associations between 32 agrichemicals and cancer subtypes were assessed using the Generalized Weighted Quantile Sum Regression (gWQS) model. The model was fit assuming a Poisson distribution and using the pediatric population as an offset-term and social vulnerability factors as covariates. We observed a statistically significant positive association between the 32 agrichemicals and overall pediatric cancer and subtypes. The strength of associations was slightly stronger among brain and CNS cancers (β = 0.36, CI = 0.14, 0.57) compared to overall cancer (β = 0.30, CI = 0.16, 0.44) and leukemia (β = 0.23, CI = 0.09, 0.38). Dicamba, glyphosate, paraquat, quizalofop, triasulfuron, and tefluthrin largely contributed to the joint association. These findings may explain the joint associations of the agrichemical mixture on childhood cancer. Alternative biomarker-based approaches to measuring human exposure are worth investigating for chemicals of concern, particularly in counties with high agrichemical and cancer rates.
期刊介绍:
GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.