G. Ziade, R. Saade, D. Daou, D. Karam, A. Bendito, M. Tsintsadze
{"title":"使用带刺螺纹结合透明质酸填充剂和 A 型肉毒杆菌毒素重塑鼻形","authors":"G. Ziade, R. Saade, D. Daou, D. Karam, A. Bendito, M. Tsintsadze","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rhinoplasty is a prominent procedure in facial aesthetics, but extended surgical downtime remains its significant limitation. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative, offering significant aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of three nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques combined, including hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, botulinum toxin type A (BTX), and barbed lifting threads.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 85 patients were included into three groups: 63 subjects received HA filler and BTX injections, 9 subjects received barbed threads followed by BTX injections, and 13 received threads followed by HA filler and BTX injections. Patients assessed their satisfaction 1 month and a year posttreatment as well as adverse effects 48 h and 1 week after treatment using FACE-Q questionnaire for nose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both 1 month and a year after treatment, the triple combination of barbed threads with HA filler and BTX demonstrated superior nose FACE-Q scores compared to the two other groups, showing highest patient satisfaction and minimal efficacy decay over time. No significant difference in FACE-Q scores was observed between the two groups receiving HA filler + BTX and barbed threads + BTX at either 1 month or a year posttreatment. Adverse effects were reported by subjects in all three groups 48 h posttreatment and completely resolved by 1 week after treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combining nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques—such as lifting threads, HA fillers, and botulinum toxin—can deliver effective aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. Among these, the triple combination of HA filler, BTX, and lifting threads results in the highest and most sustained patient satisfaction, lasting no less than 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Reshaping Using Barbed Threads Combined With Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Botulinum Toxin A\",\"authors\":\"G. Ziade, R. Saade, D. Daou, D. Karam, A. Bendito, M. Tsintsadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocd.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rhinoplasty is a prominent procedure in facial aesthetics, but extended surgical downtime remains its significant limitation. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative, offering significant aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of three nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques combined, including hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, botulinum toxin type A (BTX), and barbed lifting threads.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 85 patients were included into three groups: 63 subjects received HA filler and BTX injections, 9 subjects received barbed threads followed by BTX injections, and 13 received threads followed by HA filler and BTX injections. Patients assessed their satisfaction 1 month and a year posttreatment as well as adverse effects 48 h and 1 week after treatment using FACE-Q questionnaire for nose.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both 1 month and a year after treatment, the triple combination of barbed threads with HA filler and BTX demonstrated superior nose FACE-Q scores compared to the two other groups, showing highest patient satisfaction and minimal efficacy decay over time. No significant difference in FACE-Q scores was observed between the two groups receiving HA filler + BTX and barbed threads + BTX at either 1 month or a year posttreatment. Adverse effects were reported by subjects in all three groups 48 h posttreatment and completely resolved by 1 week after treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Combining nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques—such as lifting threads, HA fillers, and botulinum toxin—can deliver effective aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. Among these, the triple combination of HA filler, BTX, and lifting threads results in the highest and most sustained patient satisfaction, lasting no less than 1 year.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nasal Reshaping Using Barbed Threads Combined With Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Botulinum Toxin A
Background
Rhinoplasty is a prominent procedure in facial aesthetics, but extended surgical downtime remains its significant limitation. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative, offering significant aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of three nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques combined, including hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, botulinum toxin type A (BTX), and barbed lifting threads.
Methods
A total of 85 patients were included into three groups: 63 subjects received HA filler and BTX injections, 9 subjects received barbed threads followed by BTX injections, and 13 received threads followed by HA filler and BTX injections. Patients assessed their satisfaction 1 month and a year posttreatment as well as adverse effects 48 h and 1 week after treatment using FACE-Q questionnaire for nose.
Results
Both 1 month and a year after treatment, the triple combination of barbed threads with HA filler and BTX demonstrated superior nose FACE-Q scores compared to the two other groups, showing highest patient satisfaction and minimal efficacy decay over time. No significant difference in FACE-Q scores was observed between the two groups receiving HA filler + BTX and barbed threads + BTX at either 1 month or a year posttreatment. Adverse effects were reported by subjects in all three groups 48 h posttreatment and completely resolved by 1 week after treatment.
Conclusion
Combining nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques—such as lifting threads, HA fillers, and botulinum toxin—can deliver effective aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. Among these, the triple combination of HA filler, BTX, and lifting threads results in the highest and most sustained patient satisfaction, lasting no less than 1 year.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques.
The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.