职业健康和安全观念的性别差异：来自青年双职培训的见解

IF 5.4 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106797

Myriam Bérubé , Céline Chatigny , Marie Laberge

{"title":"职业健康和安全观念的性别差异：来自青年双职培训的见解","authors":"Myriam Bérubé , Céline Chatigny , Marie Laberge","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While occupational health and safety (OHS) education is important for all new workers, it appears critical for youth in dual vocational training programs. To develop prevention tools adapted to their situation, the first stage of an action-research study was to question their perceptions and experiences of OHS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines the perceptions of OHS among young students with disabilities enrolled in the Work-Oriented Training Path (WOTP) in Québec.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed-methods study based on questionnaires given to 131 (38 women, 93 men) WOTP students and Ministry documents. Descriptive and comparative quantitative analyses were conducted with a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions and documents. A gender-sensitive analysis was carried out since it is a recognized influencing factor to consider in OHS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Men and women worked in different environments (p = 0.002). Men seem to be more aware of the presence of hazards (yes = 79.6 %) than women (yes = 50 %) (p = 0.001), and collectively named 15 risk categories, compared to 9 for women. A modest proportion of men (yes = 44.1 %) and women (yes = 31.6 %) reported having received OHS training in their traineeship. Men had a slightly less marked interest in OHS (p = 0.047). A large proportion of students reported having experienced an occupational injury (43.5 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Targeted interventions are needed to ensure safe learning environments and equitable OHS training for youth with disabilities. Women might be confronted with unrecognized or invisible hazards, and all could benefit from a training that addresses those.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106797"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in occupational health and safety perceptions: Insights from youth in dual vocational training\",\"authors\":\"Myriam Bérubé , Céline Chatigny , Marie Laberge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While occupational health and safety (OHS) education is important for all new workers, it appears critical for youth in dual vocational training programs. To develop prevention tools adapted to their situation, the first stage of an action-research study was to question their perceptions and experiences of OHS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines the perceptions of OHS among young students with disabilities enrolled in the Work-Oriented Training Path (WOTP) in Québec.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed-methods study based on questionnaires given to 131 (38 women, 93 men) WOTP students and Ministry documents. Descriptive and comparative quantitative analyses were conducted with a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions and documents. A gender-sensitive analysis was carried out since it is a recognized influencing factor to consider in OHS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Men and women worked in different environments (p = 0.002). Men seem to be more aware of the presence of hazards (yes = 79.6 %) than women (yes = 50 %) (p = 0.001), and collectively named 15 risk categories, compared to 9 for women. A modest proportion of men (yes = 44.1 %) and women (yes = 31.6 %) reported having received OHS training in their traineeship. Men had a slightly less marked interest in OHS (p = 0.047). A large proportion of students reported having experienced an occupational injury (43.5 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Targeted interventions are needed to ensure safe learning environments and equitable OHS training for youth with disabilities. Women might be confronted with unrecognized or invisible hazards, and all could benefit from a training that addresses those.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000220\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

职业健康与安全（OHS）教育对所有新工人都很重要，但对参加双轨制职业培训计划的年轻人来说，这似乎至关重要。为了开发适合他们情况的预防工具，行动研究的第一阶段是询问他们对职业健康安全的看法和经验。目的了解曲海省参加工作导向培训的青年残疾学生对职业健康安全的认知。方法对131名WOTP学生（女性38人，男性93人）进行问卷调查，并结合教育部的文献资料，采用混合方法进行研究。描述性和比较性定量分析与开放式问题和文件的定性分析一起进行。进行了对性别问题敏感的分析，因为这是职业安全与卫生中需要考虑的一个公认的影响因素。结果男女工作环境不同（p = 0.002）。男性似乎比女性更能意识到危险的存在（是= 79.6%）（是= 50%）（p = 0.001），并且总共列出了15种风险类别，而女性为9种。一小部分男性（44.1%）和女性（31.6%）报告在实习期间接受过职业健康安全培训。男性对OHS的关注程度稍低（p = 0.047）。很大一部分学生报告曾遭受过职业伤害（43.5%）。结论需要有针对性的干预措施，以确保残疾青少年安全的学习环境和公平的职业健康安全培训。妇女可能会面临无法识别或看不见的危险，所有人都可以从解决这些危险的培训中受益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Gender differences in occupational health and safety perceptions: Insights from youth in dual vocational training

Introduction

While occupational health and safety (OHS) education is important for all new workers, it appears critical for youth in dual vocational training programs. To develop prevention tools adapted to their situation, the first stage of an action-research study was to question their perceptions and experiences of OHS.

Objective

This study examines the perceptions of OHS among young students with disabilities enrolled in the Work-Oriented Training Path (WOTP) in Québec.

Method

A mixed-methods study based on questionnaires given to 131 (38 women, 93 men) WOTP students and Ministry documents. Descriptive and comparative quantitative analyses were conducted with a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions and documents. A gender-sensitive analysis was carried out since it is a recognized influencing factor to consider in OHS.

Results

Men and women worked in different environments (p = 0.002). Men seem to be more aware of the presence of hazards (yes = 79.6 %) than women (yes = 50 %) (p = 0.001), and collectively named 15 risk categories, compared to 9 for women. A modest proportion of men (yes = 44.1 %) and women (yes = 31.6 %) reported having received OHS training in their traineeship. Men had a slightly less marked interest in OHS (p = 0.047). A large proportion of students reported having experienced an occupational injury (43.5 %).

Conclusions

Targeted interventions are needed to ensure safe learning environments and equitable OHS training for youth with disabilities. Women might be confronted with unrecognized or invisible hazards, and all could benefit from a training that addresses those.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Safety Science 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

13.00

自引率

9.80%

发文量

335

审稿时长

53 days

期刊介绍： Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.