经皮颈椎椎弓根螺钉导航置入:解剖学可行性研究

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
G. Schmeiser , C. Blume , N. Hecht , S. Mattes , H. Ittrich , R. Kothe
{"title":"经皮颈椎椎弓根螺钉导航置入:解剖学可行性研究","authors":"G. Schmeiser ,&nbsp;C. Blume ,&nbsp;N. Hecht ,&nbsp;S. Mattes ,&nbsp;H. Ittrich ,&nbsp;R. Kothe","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Percutaneous cervical pedicle screw placement is challenging due to complex anatomy, and requires navigation support. It is unclear how to ensure navigation accuracy in minimally invasive procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>How accurate is image-guided percutaneous pedicle screw positioning after referencing with only one clamp for the complete subaxial cervical spine?</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In six cadavers, all subaxial cervical pedicles were fitted with screws using a standardized procedure. Briefly, a reference clamp was placed via a small skin incision on spinous process C7. The procedure started from C3 and progressed towards C7, without additional imaging, using one registration for all vertebrae. Screws were placed using a navigated screwdriver. Cone-beam CT was performed at three time-points. Screw position was directly intraoperatively evaluated by the surgeons using a modified classification—from Grade 1 (perfect placement) to Grade 5 (highly inaccurate)—and these data were re-evaluated by two independent radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In six human specimens, 10 guidewires each were placed bilaterally in C3–C7. One screw (1.7%) was intraoperatively classified as Grade 3, but as Grade 4 in the second assessment. All other screws were classified as Grades 1–2 (89.8%) or 3 (8.5%). Screw placement accuracy was not significantly impacted by distance to the clamp or side selection.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In percutaneously navigated screw placement with intraoperative imaging, safe screw placement was possible with a reference clamp on C7. Clinical application of this technique has been limited to individual cases. We also propose a new classification for improving screw accuracy and clinical consequences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigated percutaneous placement of cervical pedicle screws: An anatomical feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"G. Schmeiser ,&nbsp;C. Blume ,&nbsp;N. Hecht ,&nbsp;S. Mattes ,&nbsp;H. Ittrich ,&nbsp;R. Kothe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Percutaneous cervical pedicle screw placement is challenging due to complex anatomy, and requires navigation support. It is unclear how to ensure navigation accuracy in minimally invasive procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>How accurate is image-guided percutaneous pedicle screw positioning after referencing with only one clamp for the complete subaxial cervical spine?</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In six cadavers, all subaxial cervical pedicles were fitted with screws using a standardized procedure. Briefly, a reference clamp was placed via a small skin incision on spinous process C7. The procedure started from C3 and progressed towards C7, without additional imaging, using one registration for all vertebrae. Screws were placed using a navigated screwdriver. Cone-beam CT was performed at three time-points. Screw position was directly intraoperatively evaluated by the surgeons using a modified classification—from Grade 1 (perfect placement) to Grade 5 (highly inaccurate)—and these data were re-evaluated by two independent radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In six human specimens, 10 guidewires each were placed bilaterally in C3–C7. One screw (1.7%) was intraoperatively classified as Grade 3, but as Grade 4 in the second assessment. All other screws were classified as Grades 1–2 (89.8%) or 3 (8.5%). Screw placement accuracy was not significantly impacted by distance to the clamp or side selection.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In percutaneously navigated screw placement with intraoperative imaging, safe screw placement was possible with a reference clamp on C7. Clinical application of this technique has been limited to individual cases. We also propose a new classification for improving screw accuracy and clinical consequences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于复杂的解剖结构,经皮颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入具有挑战性,并且需要导航支持。目前尚不清楚如何在微创手术中确保导航的准确性。研究问题:图像引导下经皮椎弓根螺钉定位的准确性如何?材料和方法在6具尸体中,所有颈椎下轴椎弓根均采用标准化程序螺钉固定。简单地说,参考钳通过棘突C7的小皮肤切口放置。手术从C3开始,向C7进展,没有额外的成像,所有椎骨使用一次配准。使用导航螺丝刀放置螺钉。锥形束CT在三个时间点进行。术中直接由外科医生评估螺钉位置,使用修改后的分级-从1级(完全放置)到5级(高度不准确)-这些数据由两位独立的放射科医生重新评估。结果6例人体标本在C3-C7两侧各放置10根导丝。1颗螺钉(1.7%)术中被评为3级,但在第二次评估中被评为4级。其余螺钉均为1-2级(89.8%)或3级(8.5%)。螺钉放置精度不受与钳的距离或侧边选择的显著影响。在经皮导航置入术中显像螺钉时,在C7上使用参考钳可以安全置入螺钉。该技术的临床应用仅限于个别病例。我们还提出了新的分类,以提高螺钉的准确性和临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigated percutaneous placement of cervical pedicle screws: An anatomical feasibility study

Introduction

Percutaneous cervical pedicle screw placement is challenging due to complex anatomy, and requires navigation support. It is unclear how to ensure navigation accuracy in minimally invasive procedures.

Research question

How accurate is image-guided percutaneous pedicle screw positioning after referencing with only one clamp for the complete subaxial cervical spine?

Materials and methods

In six cadavers, all subaxial cervical pedicles were fitted with screws using a standardized procedure. Briefly, a reference clamp was placed via a small skin incision on spinous process C7. The procedure started from C3 and progressed towards C7, without additional imaging, using one registration for all vertebrae. Screws were placed using a navigated screwdriver. Cone-beam CT was performed at three time-points. Screw position was directly intraoperatively evaluated by the surgeons using a modified classification—from Grade 1 (perfect placement) to Grade 5 (highly inaccurate)—and these data were re-evaluated by two independent radiologists.

Results

In six human specimens, 10 guidewires each were placed bilaterally in C3–C7. One screw (1.7%) was intraoperatively classified as Grade 3, but as Grade 4 in the second assessment. All other screws were classified as Grades 1–2 (89.8%) or 3 (8.5%). Screw placement accuracy was not significantly impacted by distance to the clamp or side selection.

Discussion

In percutaneously navigated screw placement with intraoperative imaging, safe screw placement was possible with a reference clamp on C7. Clinical application of this technique has been limited to individual cases. We also propose a new classification for improving screw accuracy and clinical consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信