官地庙陶器分析:对安阳时期农村经济的新认识

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Suting Li , Roderick Campbell , Andrew Womack , Camilla Sturm , Mi Wang , Kechu Huang
{"title":"官地庙陶器分析:对安阳时期农村经济的新认识","authors":"Suting Li ,&nbsp;Roderick Campbell ,&nbsp;Andrew Womack ,&nbsp;Camilla Sturm ,&nbsp;Mi Wang ,&nbsp;Kechu Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Guandimiao is a uniquely important site as the only extensively excavated Shang village. Twenty one kilns and abundant ceramic production tools and waste suggested that pottery was a major economic focus. We conducted a stratified random sampling of the site and analyzed 10% of the total sherd assemblage. These results compared well to the original diagnostic analysis of the entire assemblage. By comparing the sherds recovered from different unit types we were show that production and consumption assemblages differed. The key difference was the ratio of li-tripod cooking vessels to large storage vessels – higher in domestic and ritual contexts and lower in production contexts. An analysis of misfired sherds showed an even lower ratio of li to large storage vessels, verifying the impression that the major focus of production was large storage vessels and secondarily li-tripod cooking vessels. The economic model that best fit this production pattern was one of local or possibly regional exchange – with Guandimiao villagers specializing in the more technically challenging of the common basic non-elite ceramic repertoire.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 105006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pottery analysis at Guandimiao: New insights into the rural economy of the anyang period\",\"authors\":\"Suting Li ,&nbsp;Roderick Campbell ,&nbsp;Andrew Womack ,&nbsp;Camilla Sturm ,&nbsp;Mi Wang ,&nbsp;Kechu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Guandimiao is a uniquely important site as the only extensively excavated Shang village. Twenty one kilns and abundant ceramic production tools and waste suggested that pottery was a major economic focus. We conducted a stratified random sampling of the site and analyzed 10% of the total sherd assemblage. These results compared well to the original diagnostic analysis of the entire assemblage. By comparing the sherds recovered from different unit types we were show that production and consumption assemblages differed. The key difference was the ratio of li-tripod cooking vessels to large storage vessels – higher in domestic and ritual contexts and lower in production contexts. An analysis of misfired sherds showed an even lower ratio of li to large storage vessels, verifying the impression that the major focus of production was large storage vessels and secondarily li-tripod cooking vessels. The economic model that best fit this production pattern was one of local or possibly regional exchange – with Guandimiao villagers specializing in the more technically challenging of the common basic non-elite ceramic repertoire.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

官地庙是唯一被广泛发掘的商村,是一个独特的重要遗址。21座窑和丰富的陶瓷生产工具和废料表明,陶器是主要的经济焦点。我们对现场进行了分层随机抽样,并分析了总碎片组合的10%。这些结果与整个组合的原始诊断分析相比较。通过比较不同单位类型的碎片,我们发现生产和消费组合是不同的。关键的区别在于li-tripod烹饪容器与大型储存容器的比例——在家庭和仪式环境中较高,而在生产环境中较低。对未点燃碎片的分析显示,锂与大型储存容器的比例甚至更低,证实了生产的主要重点是大型储存容器和次要的锂三脚架烹饪容器的印象。最适合这种生产模式的经济模式是一种地方或可能的区域交换——与关地庙村民专门从事技术上更具挑战性的普通基本非精英陶瓷节目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pottery analysis at Guandimiao: New insights into the rural economy of the anyang period
Guandimiao is a uniquely important site as the only extensively excavated Shang village. Twenty one kilns and abundant ceramic production tools and waste suggested that pottery was a major economic focus. We conducted a stratified random sampling of the site and analyzed 10% of the total sherd assemblage. These results compared well to the original diagnostic analysis of the entire assemblage. By comparing the sherds recovered from different unit types we were show that production and consumption assemblages differed. The key difference was the ratio of li-tripod cooking vessels to large storage vessels – higher in domestic and ritual contexts and lower in production contexts. An analysis of misfired sherds showed an even lower ratio of li to large storage vessels, verifying the impression that the major focus of production was large storage vessels and secondarily li-tripod cooking vessels. The economic model that best fit this production pattern was one of local or possibly regional exchange – with Guandimiao villagers specializing in the more technically challenging of the common basic non-elite ceramic repertoire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信