Noah Sandoval , Chioke Harris , Janet L. Reyna , Anthony D. Fontanini , Lixi Liu , Katelyn Stenger , Philip R. White , Amy E. Landis
{"title":"实现公平广泛的住宅建筑电气化——以洛杉矶为例考察障碍、策略和机会","authors":"Noah Sandoval , Chioke Harris , Janet L. Reyna , Anthony D. Fontanini , Lixi Liu , Katelyn Stenger , Philip R. White , Amy E. Landis","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decarbonization of residential buildings via electrification is imperative given that the energy consumed by residential buildings is the third largest end use sector in the United States with a majority of this energy being derived from fossil fuel combustion. Using Los Angeles as a case study, this paper models the techno-economics of four electrification upgrades at a variety of efficiency levels. These electrification upgrades are then put into the broad context of full residential building electrification to understand the equity outcomes in this transition. Results show that electrification via the lowest efficiency electric technologies will increase costs for households with the most common natural gas equipment and will increase the energy burden for all households, with low-income households experiencing twice the relative increase in energy burden as compared to higher income households. Additionally, under this scenario, the grid in Los Angeles will see a 40 % and 50 % increase in total annual and daily peak consumption, respectively. To meet these energy generation, transmission, and distribution needs, Los Angeles projects a six-fold increase in electricity rates. Whereas electrification via the highest efficiency electric technologies will decrease the total annual and daily electricity demand, it will decrease energy burden for all households, with the greatest reductions experienced by low-income households, and it will decrease the annual utility bills of renters anywhere from $200 to $750 with an upgrade to high-efficiency space heating and $40 to $90 for an upgrade to an electric storage heat pump water heater. Given these barriers, governments and utilities must find strategies to support households, especially vulnerable ones, in this transition to residential building electrification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 125498"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving equitable widespread residential building electrification – examining barriers, strategies, and opportunities using Los Angeles as a case study\",\"authors\":\"Noah Sandoval , Chioke Harris , Janet L. Reyna , Anthony D. Fontanini , Lixi Liu , Katelyn Stenger , Philip R. White , Amy E. Landis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The decarbonization of residential buildings via electrification is imperative given that the energy consumed by residential buildings is the third largest end use sector in the United States with a majority of this energy being derived from fossil fuel combustion. Using Los Angeles as a case study, this paper models the techno-economics of four electrification upgrades at a variety of efficiency levels. These electrification upgrades are then put into the broad context of full residential building electrification to understand the equity outcomes in this transition. Results show that electrification via the lowest efficiency electric technologies will increase costs for households with the most common natural gas equipment and will increase the energy burden for all households, with low-income households experiencing twice the relative increase in energy burden as compared to higher income households. Additionally, under this scenario, the grid in Los Angeles will see a 40 % and 50 % increase in total annual and daily peak consumption, respectively. To meet these energy generation, transmission, and distribution needs, Los Angeles projects a six-fold increase in electricity rates. Whereas electrification via the highest efficiency electric technologies will decrease the total annual and daily electricity demand, it will decrease energy burden for all households, with the greatest reductions experienced by low-income households, and it will decrease the annual utility bills of renters anywhere from $200 to $750 with an upgrade to high-efficiency space heating and $40 to $90 for an upgrade to an electric storage heat pump water heater. Given these barriers, governments and utilities must find strategies to support households, especially vulnerable ones, in this transition to residential building electrification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002284\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Achieving equitable widespread residential building electrification – examining barriers, strategies, and opportunities using Los Angeles as a case study
The decarbonization of residential buildings via electrification is imperative given that the energy consumed by residential buildings is the third largest end use sector in the United States with a majority of this energy being derived from fossil fuel combustion. Using Los Angeles as a case study, this paper models the techno-economics of four electrification upgrades at a variety of efficiency levels. These electrification upgrades are then put into the broad context of full residential building electrification to understand the equity outcomes in this transition. Results show that electrification via the lowest efficiency electric technologies will increase costs for households with the most common natural gas equipment and will increase the energy burden for all households, with low-income households experiencing twice the relative increase in energy burden as compared to higher income households. Additionally, under this scenario, the grid in Los Angeles will see a 40 % and 50 % increase in total annual and daily peak consumption, respectively. To meet these energy generation, transmission, and distribution needs, Los Angeles projects a six-fold increase in electricity rates. Whereas electrification via the highest efficiency electric technologies will decrease the total annual and daily electricity demand, it will decrease energy burden for all households, with the greatest reductions experienced by low-income households, and it will decrease the annual utility bills of renters anywhere from $200 to $750 with an upgrade to high-efficiency space heating and $40 to $90 for an upgrade to an electric storage heat pump water heater. Given these barriers, governments and utilities must find strategies to support households, especially vulnerable ones, in this transition to residential building electrification.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.