{"title":"左侧乳房自动治疗计划在平坦无滤光剂光子束中的有效性。","authors":"Prasit Tansangworn, Nichakan Chatchumnan, Kitwadee Saksornchai, Sakda Kingkaew, Mananchaya Vimolnoch, Puntiwa Oonsiri, Sornjarod Oonsiri","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_95_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Electronic compensator is a time-consuming technique for breast cancer radiation treatment planning, consequently, this presents challenges for the development of automated treatment planning for the treatment plan. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the use of automated treatment planning software for the left breast.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with left-sided breast cancer without locoregional nodes were treated with a prescribed dose of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions. Treatment planning was performed using electronic compensators. In addition, automated treatment planning techniques were utilized, which involved automated plan generation. This facilitated the comparison of dosimetric parameters: target volume (D<sub>max</sub>, homogeneity index [HI], and conformity index [CI]), organs at risk, plan parameters, and quality assurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated treatment planning exerted lower D<sub>max</sub> of PTV_Eval compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 43.4 ± 1.1 Gy and 43.9 ± 1.1 Gy, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Similarly, the HI of automated treatment planning was lower than other techniques, 0.10 ± 0.04 and 0.08 ± 0.03, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the CI or organs at risk between the two techniques (<i>P</i> = 0.11). In plan parameters, automated treatment planning required lower monitor units compared to the electronic compensator techniques, i.e., 534.3 ± 47.4 and 724.5 ± 117.9, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the automated treatment planning significantly reduced treatment time compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 2.3 ± 0.5 and 41.8 ± 15.1 min, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated treatment planning improved the treatment plan homogeneity, reduced hotspots, enhanced treatment planning efficiency, and reduced treatment planning time and doses comparable to those of normal organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 4","pages":"701-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Automated Treatment Planning for Left-sided Breast in Flattening Filter-free Photon Beams.\",\"authors\":\"Prasit Tansangworn, Nichakan Chatchumnan, Kitwadee Saksornchai, Sakda Kingkaew, Mananchaya Vimolnoch, Puntiwa Oonsiri, Sornjarod Oonsiri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_95_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Electronic compensator is a time-consuming technique for breast cancer radiation treatment planning, consequently, this presents challenges for the development of automated treatment planning for the treatment plan. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the use of automated treatment planning software for the left breast.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with left-sided breast cancer without locoregional nodes were treated with a prescribed dose of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions. Treatment planning was performed using electronic compensators. In addition, automated treatment planning techniques were utilized, which involved automated plan generation. This facilitated the comparison of dosimetric parameters: target volume (D<sub>max</sub>, homogeneity index [HI], and conformity index [CI]), organs at risk, plan parameters, and quality assurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated treatment planning exerted lower D<sub>max</sub> of PTV_Eval compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 43.4 ± 1.1 Gy and 43.9 ± 1.1 Gy, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Similarly, the HI of automated treatment planning was lower than other techniques, 0.10 ± 0.04 and 0.08 ± 0.03, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the CI or organs at risk between the two techniques (<i>P</i> = 0.11). In plan parameters, automated treatment planning required lower monitor units compared to the electronic compensator techniques, i.e., 534.3 ± 47.4 and 724.5 ± 117.9, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the automated treatment planning significantly reduced treatment time compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 2.3 ± 0.5 and 41.8 ± 15.1 min, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated treatment planning improved the treatment plan homogeneity, reduced hotspots, enhanced treatment planning efficiency, and reduced treatment planning time and doses comparable to those of normal organs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"701-705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_95_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_95_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Automated Treatment Planning for Left-sided Breast in Flattening Filter-free Photon Beams.
Purpose: Electronic compensator is a time-consuming technique for breast cancer radiation treatment planning, consequently, this presents challenges for the development of automated treatment planning for the treatment plan. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the use of automated treatment planning software for the left breast.
Subjects and methods: Thirty-eight patients with left-sided breast cancer without locoregional nodes were treated with a prescribed dose of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions. Treatment planning was performed using electronic compensators. In addition, automated treatment planning techniques were utilized, which involved automated plan generation. This facilitated the comparison of dosimetric parameters: target volume (Dmax, homogeneity index [HI], and conformity index [CI]), organs at risk, plan parameters, and quality assurance.
Results: The automated treatment planning exerted lower Dmax of PTV_Eval compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 43.4 ± 1.1 Gy and 43.9 ± 1.1 Gy, respectively (P < 0.05). Similarly, the HI of automated treatment planning was lower than other techniques, 0.10 ± 0.04 and 0.08 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the CI or organs at risk between the two techniques (P = 0.11). In plan parameters, automated treatment planning required lower monitor units compared to the electronic compensator techniques, i.e., 534.3 ± 47.4 and 724.5 ± 117.9, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the automated treatment planning significantly reduced treatment time compared to electronic compensator techniques, that is, 2.3 ± 0.5 and 41.8 ± 15.1 min, respectively (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Automated treatment planning improved the treatment plan homogeneity, reduced hotspots, enhanced treatment planning efficiency, and reduced treatment planning time and doses comparable to those of normal organs.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.