Yossi Geron, Asaf Romano, Anat Shmueli, Ran Matot, Sharon Sigal-Kaplun, Sharon Daniel, Ron Charach, Yinon Gilboa
{"title":"Angle of progression for predicting second-stage cesarean delivery complications.","authors":"Yossi Geron, Asaf Romano, Anat Shmueli, Ran Matot, Sharon Sigal-Kaplun, Sharon Daniel, Ron Charach, Yinon Gilboa","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2025.2463394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the correlation between the angle of progression (AOP) and maternal surgical complications following a second-stage cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated singleton pregnancies at term (≥37 weeks) who underwent cesarean delivery for arrest of descent at the second stage of labor from January 2022 to December 2023. Only cases with recorded AOP were included. The fetal head position was confirmed by transabdominal ultrasound, and the fetal head station was assessed manually by digital examination. The main outcome was defined as a composite adverse maternal outcome, including challenging fetal extraction, uterine extension, requirement for blood transfusions, postpartum fever, ileus, and re-hospitalization due to endometritis or surgical site infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five cases met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 (40%) experienced the composite adverse maternal outcome. These patients had wider mean AOP compared to those without maternal morbidity (136.7 ± 7.4 vs. 124.7 ± 12.5, <i>p</i> = .017<b>).</b> Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant correlation between measured AOP and composite adverse maternal outcome (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, <i>p</i> = .028). The predicted probability for composite adverse maternal outcome by receiver-operating characteristics curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) for AOP, compared to an area under the curve of 0.53 (95% CI 0.30-0.75) for the manually measured fetal head station.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a correlation between the angle of progression and maternal complications following second-stage cesarean delivery. Assessing the angle of progression before surgery may be of help to the obstetrical team to better identify susceptible cases and allow for appropriate preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2463394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2463394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的研究进展角(AOP)与第二产程剖宫产后产妇手术并发症的相关性:我们回顾性评估了2022年1月至2023年12月期间因第二产程胎位下降停止而进行剖宫产的足月(≥37周)单胎妊娠。只有记录有 AOP 的病例才被纳入。经腹超声确认胎头位置,并通过数字检查人工评估胎头位置。主要结果定义为孕产妇综合不良结局,包括难取胎儿、子宫延长、输血需求、产后发热、回肠炎以及因子宫内膜炎或手术部位感染而再次住院:25例符合纳入标准,其中10例(40%)出现了产妇综合不良结局。与未发生孕产妇不良结局的患者相比,这些患者的平均孕产妇不良结局范围更广(136.7 ± 7.4 vs. 124.7 ± 12.5,p = .017)。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,测得的 AOP 与孕产妇综合不良结局之间存在显著相关性(OR = 1.15,95% CI 1.01-1.30,p = .028)。根据接收者操作特征曲线预测的孕产妇综合不良结局概率显示,AOP的曲线下面积为0.79(95% CI 0.60-0.98),而人工测量的胎头站位的曲线下面积为0.53(95% CI 0.30-0.75):结论:我们发现第二阶段剖宫产后,胎头进展角度与产妇并发症之间存在相关性。在手术前评估胎头进展角度有助于产科团队更好地识别易感病例,并做好适当的准备。
Angle of progression for predicting second-stage cesarean delivery complications.
Objective: To investigate the correlation between the angle of progression (AOP) and maternal surgical complications following a second-stage cesarean delivery.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated singleton pregnancies at term (≥37 weeks) who underwent cesarean delivery for arrest of descent at the second stage of labor from January 2022 to December 2023. Only cases with recorded AOP were included. The fetal head position was confirmed by transabdominal ultrasound, and the fetal head station was assessed manually by digital examination. The main outcome was defined as a composite adverse maternal outcome, including challenging fetal extraction, uterine extension, requirement for blood transfusions, postpartum fever, ileus, and re-hospitalization due to endometritis or surgical site infection.
Results: Twenty-five cases met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 (40%) experienced the composite adverse maternal outcome. These patients had wider mean AOP compared to those without maternal morbidity (136.7 ± 7.4 vs. 124.7 ± 12.5, p = .017). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant correlation between measured AOP and composite adverse maternal outcome (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = .028). The predicted probability for composite adverse maternal outcome by receiver-operating characteristics curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) for AOP, compared to an area under the curve of 0.53 (95% CI 0.30-0.75) for the manually measured fetal head station.
Conclusions: We found a correlation between the angle of progression and maternal complications following second-stage cesarean delivery. Assessing the angle of progression before surgery may be of help to the obstetrical team to better identify susceptible cases and allow for appropriate preparation.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.