Hui Zhu , Jiazong Ye , Hongxia Luo , Shuangshuang Ni , Yin Pan , Zhilin Zhao , Yan Yang
{"title":"基于超声的放射组学特征与机器学习鉴别小儿周围神经母细胞肿瘤预后亚群:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Hui Zhu , Jiazong Ye , Hongxia Luo , Shuangshuang Ni , Yin Pan , Zhilin Zhao , Yan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To construct and select a better model based on ultrasonic-based radiomics features and clinical characteristics for prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 73 children with neuroblastic tumors were included and divided into a training group and a validation group. Data 1 contained the subjects’ radiomics features and clinical characteristics, while data 2 contained radiomics features. With the help of machine learning, five models were constructed for data 1 and data 2, respectively. The model with the highest accuracy and area under the curve was selected as the combined model and radiomics model for data 1 and data 2, respectively. A superior model was then chosen from the models after further comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The extreme gradient-boosting model for data 1 was chosen as the combined model and the extreme gradient-boosting model for data 2 was chosen as the radiomics model. The area under the curve of the combined and radiomics models in the validation group was 0.941 and 0.918 (<em>p</em> = 0.6906). The balanced accuracy, kappa value and F1 score of the radiomics model (0.9045, 0.8091 and 0.9091, respectively) were higher than those of the combined model (0.8545, 0.7123 and 0.8696, respectively). The top eight features of the radiomics model included five first-order statistical features and three textural features, all of which were high-dimensional features.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study proved that the radiomics model outperformed the combined model at differentiating prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors. Additionally, we found that high-dimensional ultrasonic-based radiomics features surpassed other features and clinical characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 5","pages":"Pages 852-859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Signature With Machine Learning for Differentiating Prognostic Subsets of Pediatric Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhu , Jiazong Ye , Hongxia Luo , Shuangshuang Ni , Yin Pan , Zhilin Zhao , Yan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.01.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To construct and select a better model based on ultrasonic-based radiomics features and clinical characteristics for prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 73 children with neuroblastic tumors were included and divided into a training group and a validation group. Data 1 contained the subjects’ radiomics features and clinical characteristics, while data 2 contained radiomics features. With the help of machine learning, five models were constructed for data 1 and data 2, respectively. The model with the highest accuracy and area under the curve was selected as the combined model and radiomics model for data 1 and data 2, respectively. A superior model was then chosen from the models after further comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The extreme gradient-boosting model for data 1 was chosen as the combined model and the extreme gradient-boosting model for data 2 was chosen as the radiomics model. The area under the curve of the combined and radiomics models in the validation group was 0.941 and 0.918 (<em>p</em> = 0.6906). The balanced accuracy, kappa value and F1 score of the radiomics model (0.9045, 0.8091 and 0.9091, respectively) were higher than those of the combined model (0.8545, 0.7123 and 0.8696, respectively). The top eight features of the radiomics model included five first-order statistical features and three textural features, all of which were high-dimensional features.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study proved that the radiomics model outperformed the combined model at differentiating prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors. Additionally, we found that high-dimensional ultrasonic-based radiomics features surpassed other features and clinical characteristics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 852-859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Signature With Machine Learning for Differentiating Prognostic Subsets of Pediatric Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors: A Retrospective Study
Objective
To construct and select a better model based on ultrasonic-based radiomics features and clinical characteristics for prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors.
Methods
Data from 73 children with neuroblastic tumors were included and divided into a training group and a validation group. Data 1 contained the subjects’ radiomics features and clinical characteristics, while data 2 contained radiomics features. With the help of machine learning, five models were constructed for data 1 and data 2, respectively. The model with the highest accuracy and area under the curve was selected as the combined model and radiomics model for data 1 and data 2, respectively. A superior model was then chosen from the models after further comparison.
Results
The extreme gradient-boosting model for data 1 was chosen as the combined model and the extreme gradient-boosting model for data 2 was chosen as the radiomics model. The area under the curve of the combined and radiomics models in the validation group was 0.941 and 0.918 (p = 0.6906). The balanced accuracy, kappa value and F1 score of the radiomics model (0.9045, 0.8091 and 0.9091, respectively) were higher than those of the combined model (0.8545, 0.7123 and 0.8696, respectively). The top eight features of the radiomics model included five first-order statistical features and three textural features, all of which were high-dimensional features.
Conclusion
Our study proved that the radiomics model outperformed the combined model at differentiating prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors. Additionally, we found that high-dimensional ultrasonic-based radiomics features surpassed other features and clinical characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.