土著知识和知识系统如何以研究为中心:一个土著知情的现实主义审查协议。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nikki Hunter Porter, Nicole Bulger, Anita Benoit, Josie Auger, Raglan Maddox, Janet Jull, Janice Linton, Joanna Nemeth, Simon Brascoupé, Noé Préfontaine, Diane Simon, Tina Lanceleve, Jaiden Herkimer, Cora Weber-Pillwax, Ningwakwe George, Marcia Friesen, Lisa Bourque Bearskin, Melody Morton Ninomiya
{"title":"土著知识和知识系统如何以研究为中心:一个土著知情的现实主义审查协议。","authors":"Nikki Hunter Porter, Nicole Bulger, Anita Benoit, Josie Auger, Raglan Maddox, Janet Jull, Janice Linton, Joanna Nemeth, Simon Brascoupé, Noé Préfontaine, Diane Simon, Tina Lanceleve, Jaiden Herkimer, Cora Weber-Pillwax, Ningwakwe George, Marcia Friesen, Lisa Bourque Bearskin, Melody Morton Ninomiya","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Euro-Western forms of research, Indigenous Knowledges (IK) and Knowledge systems have been misused, devalued, and stolen. Elders and Knowledge Guardians have expressed the need for IK to be protected for future generations and be included in research in a good way.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to disrupt the ongoing dominance of Eurocentric research methodologies focused on Indigenous Peoples by promoting and nurturing rights-based and distinctions-based approaches that center Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing within the entirety of this research project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol paper describes how we developed an Indigenous-informed realist review process and what the process entails. When conducting our realist review, we will examine papers indicating that IK were centered in research. Our iterative process is shaped and guided by IK within our team. To be included in the analysis, papers must (1) identify how Indigenous Peoples were leading, guiding, and/or governing the research; (2) describe how IK were a critical component of research; and (3) report on how the research benefitted Indigenous Peoples. All papers that meet our inclusion criteria will be scored using a relevance assessment tool we developed to assess how much information was provided on the local context for the Indigenous research, the outcomes from the IK in research, and the processes that facilitated the research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intention is to synthesize and amplify how IK have been centered in research, across multiple disciplines and geographies, to benefit Indigenous Peoples. We focus on nurturing and fostering ways of doing Indigenous research and including IK in a way that supports the well-being of Indigenous Peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 4","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Indigenous Knowledges and Knowledge Systems Are Centered in Research: An Indigenous-informed Realist Review Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Nikki Hunter Porter, Nicole Bulger, Anita Benoit, Josie Auger, Raglan Maddox, Janet Jull, Janice Linton, Joanna Nemeth, Simon Brascoupé, Noé Préfontaine, Diane Simon, Tina Lanceleve, Jaiden Herkimer, Cora Weber-Pillwax, Ningwakwe George, Marcia Friesen, Lisa Bourque Bearskin, Melody Morton Ninomiya\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Euro-Western forms of research, Indigenous Knowledges (IK) and Knowledge systems have been misused, devalued, and stolen. Elders and Knowledge Guardians have expressed the need for IK to be protected for future generations and be included in research in a good way.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to disrupt the ongoing dominance of Eurocentric research methodologies focused on Indigenous Peoples by promoting and nurturing rights-based and distinctions-based approaches that center Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing within the entirety of this research project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol paper describes how we developed an Indigenous-informed realist review process and what the process entails. When conducting our realist review, we will examine papers indicating that IK were centered in research. Our iterative process is shaped and guided by IK within our team. To be included in the analysis, papers must (1) identify how Indigenous Peoples were leading, guiding, and/or governing the research; (2) describe how IK were a critical component of research; and (3) report on how the research benefitted Indigenous Peoples. All papers that meet our inclusion criteria will be scored using a relevance assessment tool we developed to assess how much information was provided on the local context for the Indigenous research, the outcomes from the IK in research, and the processes that facilitated the research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intention is to synthesize and amplify how IK have been centered in research, across multiple disciplines and geographies, to benefit Indigenous Peoples. We focus on nurturing and fostering ways of doing Indigenous research and including IK in a way that supports the well-being of Indigenous Peoples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"561-572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在欧美形式的研究中,本土知识(IK)和知识系统被滥用、贬值和窃取。长者和知识守护者表示,需要为子孙后代保护本土知识,并以良好的方式将其纳入研究。目标:我们的目标是通过促进和培育基于权利和基于区别的方法,在整个研究项目中以土著的认识、存在和行为方式为中心,打破以欧洲为中心的研究方法的持续主导地位。方法:本协议文件描述了我们如何开发一个土著知情的现实主义审查过程以及该过程需要什么。在进行现实主义审查时,我们将审查表明IK以研究为中心的论文。我们的迭代过程是由我们团队中的IK塑造和指导的。要被纳入分析,论文必须(1)确定土著人民如何领导、指导和/或管理研究;(2)描述本土知识如何成为研究的关键组成部分;(3)报告该研究如何使土著人民受益。所有符合我们纳入标准的论文都将使用我们开发的相关性评估工具进行评分,以评估土著研究在当地背景下提供了多少信息,研究中的IK结果以及促进研究结果的过程。结论:我们的目的是综合和扩大如何在多学科和多地域的研究中集中IK,以造福土著人民。我们的重点是培育和促进开展土著研究的方式,并以支持土著人民福祉的方式纳入本土文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Indigenous Knowledges and Knowledge Systems Are Centered in Research: An Indigenous-informed Realist Review Protocol.

Background: In Euro-Western forms of research, Indigenous Knowledges (IK) and Knowledge systems have been misused, devalued, and stolen. Elders and Knowledge Guardians have expressed the need for IK to be protected for future generations and be included in research in a good way.

Objectives: We aim to disrupt the ongoing dominance of Eurocentric research methodologies focused on Indigenous Peoples by promoting and nurturing rights-based and distinctions-based approaches that center Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing within the entirety of this research project.

Methods: This protocol paper describes how we developed an Indigenous-informed realist review process and what the process entails. When conducting our realist review, we will examine papers indicating that IK were centered in research. Our iterative process is shaped and guided by IK within our team. To be included in the analysis, papers must (1) identify how Indigenous Peoples were leading, guiding, and/or governing the research; (2) describe how IK were a critical component of research; and (3) report on how the research benefitted Indigenous Peoples. All papers that meet our inclusion criteria will be scored using a relevance assessment tool we developed to assess how much information was provided on the local context for the Indigenous research, the outcomes from the IK in research, and the processes that facilitated the research outcomes.

Conclusions: Our intention is to synthesize and amplify how IK have been centered in research, across multiple disciplines and geographies, to benefit Indigenous Peoples. We focus on nurturing and fostering ways of doing Indigenous research and including IK in a way that supports the well-being of Indigenous Peoples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信