对在体育活动研究中代表性不足的年轻人进行社区合作心肺健康评估:经验教训。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eydie N Kramer-Kostecka, Sarah M Kaja, Velma Harris, Catherine Quinlivan, Jill Treacy, Laura Hooper, Daheia J Barr-Anderson, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
{"title":"对在体育活动研究中代表性不足的年轻人进行社区合作心肺健康评估:经验教训。","authors":"Eydie N Kramer-Kostecka, Sarah M Kaja, Velma Harris, Catherine Quinlivan, Jill Treacy, Laura Hooper, Daheia J Barr-Anderson, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) research often overrepresents White, affluent groups. Of additional concern, standard CRF testing can be inaccessible given the specialized equipment and heightened participant burden required for maximal effort fitness assessments. To address these barriers, we partnered with community-based fitness professionals and conducted field-based, submaximal effort CRF assessments among a sample of young adults enrolled in the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time) study. Participants were diverse in ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, and weight; these groups are underrepresented in physical activity research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Describe the community-informed study procedures our cross-sector team used, and (2) identify community translation lessons learned from conducting accessible CRF assessments among a sample of underrepresented young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a train-the-trainer model, community-based fitness professionals taught university-based research staff how to conduct inclusive CRF assessments. Data collection, including low-burden field tests of CRF, occurred at recreational facilities in participants' neighborhoods. Post-data collection, community-university partners co-created study takeaways that fitness entities and researchers can use to inform future community-centered projects. Our team adapted the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to present five lessons learned from this project.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Train-the-trainer models and accessible, community-informed practices prepare research staff to evaluate CRF among participants from diverse backgrounds in a respectful, inclusive manner. Moreover, our adapted RE-AIM framework can inform future community-centered CRF assessment research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The expertise of community can honor professionals' expertise and leverage community assets to support feasible fitness assessments for underrepresented community members.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 4","pages":"481-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conducting Community-Partnered Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessments with Young Adults Underrepresented in Physical Activity Research: Lessons Learned.\",\"authors\":\"Eydie N Kramer-Kostecka, Sarah M Kaja, Velma Harris, Catherine Quinlivan, Jill Treacy, Laura Hooper, Daheia J Barr-Anderson, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) research often overrepresents White, affluent groups. Of additional concern, standard CRF testing can be inaccessible given the specialized equipment and heightened participant burden required for maximal effort fitness assessments. To address these barriers, we partnered with community-based fitness professionals and conducted field-based, submaximal effort CRF assessments among a sample of young adults enrolled in the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time) study. Participants were diverse in ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, and weight; these groups are underrepresented in physical activity research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Describe the community-informed study procedures our cross-sector team used, and (2) identify community translation lessons learned from conducting accessible CRF assessments among a sample of underrepresented young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a train-the-trainer model, community-based fitness professionals taught university-based research staff how to conduct inclusive CRF assessments. Data collection, including low-burden field tests of CRF, occurred at recreational facilities in participants' neighborhoods. Post-data collection, community-university partners co-created study takeaways that fitness entities and researchers can use to inform future community-centered projects. Our team adapted the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to present five lessons learned from this project.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Train-the-trainer models and accessible, community-informed practices prepare research staff to evaluate CRF among participants from diverse backgrounds in a respectful, inclusive manner. Moreover, our adapted RE-AIM framework can inform future community-centered CRF assessment research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The expertise of community can honor professionals' expertise and leverage community assets to support feasible fitness assessments for underrepresented community members.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"481-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体育活动和心肺健康(CRF)研究经常过度代表白人,富裕群体。另外值得关注的是,标准的CRF测试可能无法获得,因为专业设备和最大努力体能评估所需的参与者负担增加。为了解决这些障碍,我们与社区健身专业人士合作,在参加EAT项目(长期饮食和活动)研究的年轻人样本中进行了基于现场的次最大努力CRF评估。参与者的种族、种族、社会经济地位和体重各不相同;这些群体在体育活动研究中代表性不足。目标:(1)描述我们跨部门团队使用的社区知情研究程序,(2)确定在代表性不足的年轻人样本中进行无障碍CRF评估所获得的社区翻译经验教训。方法:采用以社区为基础的健身专业人员对大学研究人员进行包容性CRF评估的培训模式。在参与者所在社区的娱乐设施中进行了数据收集,包括低负荷的CRF现场测试。数据收集后,社区大学合作伙伴共同创建了研究要点,健身实体和研究人员可以将其用于未来以社区为中心的项目。我们的团队调整了RE-AIM框架(覆盖、有效性、采用、实现和维护),以呈现从该项目中吸取的五个经验教训。经验教训:培训师模式和可获得的、社区知情的实践使研究人员能够以尊重和包容的方式评估来自不同背景的参与者的CRF。此外,我们改编的RE-AIM框架可以为未来以社区为中心的CRF评估研究提供信息。结论:社区专业知识可以尊重专业人员的专业知识,并利用社区资产来支持对代表性不足的社区成员进行可行的健康评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conducting Community-Partnered Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessments with Young Adults Underrepresented in Physical Activity Research: Lessons Learned.

Background: Physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) research often overrepresents White, affluent groups. Of additional concern, standard CRF testing can be inaccessible given the specialized equipment and heightened participant burden required for maximal effort fitness assessments. To address these barriers, we partnered with community-based fitness professionals and conducted field-based, submaximal effort CRF assessments among a sample of young adults enrolled in the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time) study. Participants were diverse in ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, and weight; these groups are underrepresented in physical activity research.

Objectives: (1) Describe the community-informed study procedures our cross-sector team used, and (2) identify community translation lessons learned from conducting accessible CRF assessments among a sample of underrepresented young adults.

Methods: Using a train-the-trainer model, community-based fitness professionals taught university-based research staff how to conduct inclusive CRF assessments. Data collection, including low-burden field tests of CRF, occurred at recreational facilities in participants' neighborhoods. Post-data collection, community-university partners co-created study takeaways that fitness entities and researchers can use to inform future community-centered projects. Our team adapted the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to present five lessons learned from this project.

Lessons learned: Train-the-trainer models and accessible, community-informed practices prepare research staff to evaluate CRF among participants from diverse backgrounds in a respectful, inclusive manner. Moreover, our adapted RE-AIM framework can inform future community-centered CRF assessment research.

Conclusions: The expertise of community can honor professionals' expertise and leverage community assets to support feasible fitness assessments for underrepresented community members.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信