世界精神卫生调查中对常见焦虑、情绪和物质使用障碍进行12个月治疗的障碍

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Maria Carmen Viana, Alan E Kazdin, Meredith G Harris, Dan J Stein, Daniel V Vigo, Irving Hwang, Sophie M Manoukian, Nancy A Sampson, Jordi Alonso, Laura Helena Andrade, Guilherme Borges, Brendan Bunting, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Giovanni de Girolamo, Peter de Jonge, Oye Gureje, Josep Maria Haro, Elie G Karam, Viviane Kovess-Masfety, Jacek Moskalewicz, Fernando Navarro-Mateu, Daisuke Nishi, Marina Piazza, José Posada-Villa, Kate M Scott, Cristian Vladescu, Bogdan Wojtyniak, Zahari Zarkov, Ronald C Kessler, Timothy Kessler
{"title":"世界精神卫生调查中对常见焦虑、情绪和物质使用障碍进行12个月治疗的障碍","authors":"Maria Carmen Viana, Alan E Kazdin, Meredith G Harris, Dan J Stein, Daniel V Vigo, Irving Hwang, Sophie M Manoukian, Nancy A Sampson, Jordi Alonso, Laura Helena Andrade, Guilherme Borges, Brendan Bunting, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Giovanni de Girolamo, Peter de Jonge, Oye Gureje, Josep Maria Haro, Elie G Karam, Viviane Kovess-Masfety, Jacek Moskalewicz, Fernando Navarro-Mateu, Daisuke Nishi, Marina Piazza, José Posada-Villa, Kate M Scott, Cristian Vladescu, Bogdan Wojtyniak, Zahari Zarkov, Ronald C Kessler, Timothy Kessler","doi":"10.1186/s13033-024-00658-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High unmet need for treatment of mental disorders exists throughout the world. An understanding of barriers to treatment is needed to develop effective programs to address this problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on barriers were obtained from face-to-face interviews in 22 community surveys across 19 countries (n = 102,812 respondents aged ≥ 18 years, 57.7% female, median age [interquartile range]: 43 [31-57] years; 68.5% weighted average response rate) in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. We focus on the n = 5,136 respondents with 12-month DSM-IV anxiety, mood, or substance use disorders with perceived need for treatment. The n = 2,444 such respondents who did not receive treatment were asked about barriers to receiving treatment, whereas the n = 926 respondents who received treatment with a delay were asked about barriers leading to delays. Consistent with previous research, we distinguished five broad classes of barriers: low perceived disorder severity, two types of barriers in the domain of predisposing factors (beliefs/attitudes about treatment ineffectiveness and stigma) and two types in the domain of enabling factors (financial and nonfinancial). Baseline predictors of receiving treatment found in a prior report (i.e., comparing the n = 2,692 respondents who received treatment with the n = 2,444 who did not) were examined as predictors of barriers, while barriers were examined as mediators of associations between these predictors and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents reported multiple barriers. Barriers among respondents who did not receive treatment included low perceived severity (52.9%), perceived treatment ineffectiveness (44.8%), nonfinancial (40.2%) and financial (32.9%) barriers in the domain of enabling factors, and stigma (20.6%). Barriers causing delays in treatment had a similar rank-order but were reported by higher proportions of respondents (X<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> = 3.8-199.8, p = 0.050- < 0.001). Barriers were predicted by low education, disorder type, age, employment status, and financial obstacles. Predictors varied as a function of barrier type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wide range of barriers to treatment exist among people with mental disorders even after a need for treatment is acknowledged. Most such individuals have multiple barriers. These results have important implications for the design of programs to decrease unmet need for treatment of mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to 12-month treatment of common anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Carmen Viana, Alan E Kazdin, Meredith G Harris, Dan J Stein, Daniel V Vigo, Irving Hwang, Sophie M Manoukian, Nancy A Sampson, Jordi Alonso, Laura Helena Andrade, Guilherme Borges, Brendan Bunting, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Giovanni de Girolamo, Peter de Jonge, Oye Gureje, Josep Maria Haro, Elie G Karam, Viviane Kovess-Masfety, Jacek Moskalewicz, Fernando Navarro-Mateu, Daisuke Nishi, Marina Piazza, José Posada-Villa, Kate M Scott, Cristian Vladescu, Bogdan Wojtyniak, Zahari Zarkov, Ronald C Kessler, Timothy Kessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13033-024-00658-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High unmet need for treatment of mental disorders exists throughout the world. An understanding of barriers to treatment is needed to develop effective programs to address this problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on barriers were obtained from face-to-face interviews in 22 community surveys across 19 countries (n = 102,812 respondents aged ≥ 18 years, 57.7% female, median age [interquartile range]: 43 [31-57] years; 68.5% weighted average response rate) in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. We focus on the n = 5,136 respondents with 12-month DSM-IV anxiety, mood, or substance use disorders with perceived need for treatment. The n = 2,444 such respondents who did not receive treatment were asked about barriers to receiving treatment, whereas the n = 926 respondents who received treatment with a delay were asked about barriers leading to delays. Consistent with previous research, we distinguished five broad classes of barriers: low perceived disorder severity, two types of barriers in the domain of predisposing factors (beliefs/attitudes about treatment ineffectiveness and stigma) and two types in the domain of enabling factors (financial and nonfinancial). Baseline predictors of receiving treatment found in a prior report (i.e., comparing the n = 2,692 respondents who received treatment with the n = 2,444 who did not) were examined as predictors of barriers, while barriers were examined as mediators of associations between these predictors and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents reported multiple barriers. Barriers among respondents who did not receive treatment included low perceived severity (52.9%), perceived treatment ineffectiveness (44.8%), nonfinancial (40.2%) and financial (32.9%) barriers in the domain of enabling factors, and stigma (20.6%). Barriers causing delays in treatment had a similar rank-order but were reported by higher proportions of respondents (X<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> = 3.8-199.8, p = 0.050- < 0.001). Barriers were predicted by low education, disorder type, age, employment status, and financial obstacles. Predictors varied as a function of barrier type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wide range of barriers to treatment exist among people with mental disorders even after a need for treatment is acknowledged. Most such individuals have multiple barriers. These results have important implications for the design of programs to decrease unmet need for treatment of mental disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00658-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00658-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在世界范围内,精神障碍治疗的高未满足需求存在。了解治疗障碍是制定有效方案解决这一问题的必要条件。方法:来自19个国家22个社区的面对面访谈获得障碍数据(n = 102,812名年龄≥18岁的受访者,57.7%为女性,年龄中位数[四分位数间距]:43[31-57]岁;68.5%加权平均应答率)。我们关注了n = 5136名患有12个月DSM-IV焦虑、情绪或物质使用障碍并认为需要治疗的受访者。n = 2444名没有接受治疗的受访者被问及接受治疗的障碍,而n = 926名接受延迟治疗的受访者被问及导致延迟的障碍。与之前的研究一致,我们区分了五大类障碍:低感知障碍严重程度,两种类型的障碍在易感因素领域(关于治疗无效和耻辱的信念/态度)和两种类型的障碍在使能因素领域(经济和非经济)。在先前的报告中发现的接受治疗的基线预测因子(即,比较n = 2,692名接受治疗的受访者与n = 2,444名未接受治疗的受访者)被检查为障碍的预测因子,而障碍被检查为这些预测因子与治疗之间关联的中介。结果:大多数受访者报告了多重障碍。未接受治疗的受访者面临的障碍包括认知严重性低(52.9%)、认知治疗无效(44.8%)、促成因素领域的非经济(40.2%)和经济(32.9%)障碍,以及耻辱感(20.6%)。导致治疗延误的障碍有相似的等级顺序,但被更高比例的受访者报告(X21 = 3.8-199.8, p = 0.050)。结论:即使在承认需要治疗后,精神障碍患者中仍存在各种各样的治疗障碍。大多数这样的人都有多重障碍。这些结果对于设计减少未满足的精神障碍治疗需求的项目具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to 12-month treatment of common anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys.

Background: High unmet need for treatment of mental disorders exists throughout the world. An understanding of barriers to treatment is needed to develop effective programs to address this problem.

Methods: Data on barriers were obtained from face-to-face interviews in 22 community surveys across 19 countries (n = 102,812 respondents aged ≥ 18 years, 57.7% female, median age [interquartile range]: 43 [31-57] years; 68.5% weighted average response rate) in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. We focus on the n = 5,136 respondents with 12-month DSM-IV anxiety, mood, or substance use disorders with perceived need for treatment. The n = 2,444 such respondents who did not receive treatment were asked about barriers to receiving treatment, whereas the n = 926 respondents who received treatment with a delay were asked about barriers leading to delays. Consistent with previous research, we distinguished five broad classes of barriers: low perceived disorder severity, two types of barriers in the domain of predisposing factors (beliefs/attitudes about treatment ineffectiveness and stigma) and two types in the domain of enabling factors (financial and nonfinancial). Baseline predictors of receiving treatment found in a prior report (i.e., comparing the n = 2,692 respondents who received treatment with the n = 2,444 who did not) were examined as predictors of barriers, while barriers were examined as mediators of associations between these predictors and treatment.

Results: Most respondents reported multiple barriers. Barriers among respondents who did not receive treatment included low perceived severity (52.9%), perceived treatment ineffectiveness (44.8%), nonfinancial (40.2%) and financial (32.9%) barriers in the domain of enabling factors, and stigma (20.6%). Barriers causing delays in treatment had a similar rank-order but were reported by higher proportions of respondents (X21 = 3.8-199.8, p = 0.050- < 0.001). Barriers were predicted by low education, disorder type, age, employment status, and financial obstacles. Predictors varied as a function of barrier type.

Conclusions: A wide range of barriers to treatment exist among people with mental disorders even after a need for treatment is acknowledged. Most such individuals have multiple barriers. These results have important implications for the design of programs to decrease unmet need for treatment of mental disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信