临床前牙科手术课程能力考试学生自我评价与教师评价的比较

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S493719
Maryam A Alghilan, Swapna Munaga, Ahmed Aldakhil
{"title":"临床前牙科手术课程能力考试学生自我评价与教师评价的比较","authors":"Maryam A Alghilan, Swapna Munaga, Ahmed Aldakhil","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S493719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Student self-assessment is a skill that is taught, assessed, and attained in education for lifelong learning. In dental education, developing self-assessment is essential during the early stages of psychomotor learning. This study compared dental students' self-assessments and instructors' assessments in competency examinations and evaluated the progress and potential predictors of self-assessment performance, including achievement level and gender, in a Preclinical Operative Dentistry course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preclinical operative dentistry assessment and self-assessment records by instructors and students, respectively, were collected retrospectively from intra-semester and final examination assessment rubrics. The instructors' scoring agreement level was measured using inter-rater reliability and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Students' self-assessment data were compared with instructors' assessment data, and agreement was tested using inter-rater reliability estimates. The significance level was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Instructors were calibrated based on significant agreement (p < 0.001) between full-time and part-time instructors (ICCs = 0.888 and 0.859, respectively). A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between instructors' and students' mean scores. Students' gender was significantly associated with their evaluation of performance in the intra-semester examination (p = 0.048). Most male students (58%) overestimated their performance, while the majority (44%) of female students tend to evaluate their performance accurately. There was no significant difference in the scoring of instructors and high achievers classified in the \"excellent\" category (p = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In preclinical operative dentistry education, students' ability to accurately self-assess the quality of their work varies, and may be predicted by gender and achievement level. Students who underestimate their performance in self-assessment tend not to show improvement in their actual performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"177-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Assessment and Instructors' Assessment in Competency Examinations in a Preclinical Operative Dentistry Course.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam A Alghilan, Swapna Munaga, Ahmed Aldakhil\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S493719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Student self-assessment is a skill that is taught, assessed, and attained in education for lifelong learning. In dental education, developing self-assessment is essential during the early stages of psychomotor learning. This study compared dental students' self-assessments and instructors' assessments in competency examinations and evaluated the progress and potential predictors of self-assessment performance, including achievement level and gender, in a Preclinical Operative Dentistry course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preclinical operative dentistry assessment and self-assessment records by instructors and students, respectively, were collected retrospectively from intra-semester and final examination assessment rubrics. The instructors' scoring agreement level was measured using inter-rater reliability and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Students' self-assessment data were compared with instructors' assessment data, and agreement was tested using inter-rater reliability estimates. The significance level was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Instructors were calibrated based on significant agreement (p < 0.001) between full-time and part-time instructors (ICCs = 0.888 and 0.859, respectively). A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between instructors' and students' mean scores. Students' gender was significantly associated with their evaluation of performance in the intra-semester examination (p = 0.048). Most male students (58%) overestimated their performance, while the majority (44%) of female students tend to evaluate their performance accurately. There was no significant difference in the scoring of instructors and high achievers classified in the \\\"excellent\\\" category (p = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In preclinical operative dentistry education, students' ability to accurately self-assess the quality of their work varies, and may be predicted by gender and achievement level. Students who underestimate their performance in self-assessment tend not to show improvement in their actual performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"177-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S493719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S493719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:学生自我评估是一种在终身学习的教育中被教授、评估和获得的技能。在牙科教育中,在心理运动学习的早期阶段,发展自我评估是必不可少的。本研究比较了临床前牙科手术课程学生自我评估与教师能力测试评估的差异,并评估了自我评估绩效的进展和潜在预测因素,包括成绩水平和性别。方法:回顾性收集教师和学生的临床前牙外科评估和自评记录,分别来自学期内和期末考试评估细则。教师的评分一致性水平采用评分者间信度和班级内相关性(ICCs)来衡量。学生自评资料与教师评量资料比较,并使用评量者间信度估计检验一致性。显著性水平设为0.05。结果:教师的校准基于全职和兼职教师之间的显著一致性(p < 0.001) (ICCs分别= 0.888和0.859)。教师平均分与学生平均分有显著差异(p < 0.001)。学生性别与学期内考试成绩评价显著相关(p = 0.048)。大多数男学生(58%)高估了自己的表现,而大多数女学生(44%)倾向于准确评估自己的表现。教师与优等生的得分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.392)。结论:在临床前牙科手术教育中,学生准确自我评价工作质量的能力存在差异,且可能受性别和学业水平的影响。在自我评估中低估自己表现的学生往往不会在实际表现中表现出进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Assessment and Instructors' Assessment in Competency Examinations in a Preclinical Operative Dentistry Course.

Objective: Student self-assessment is a skill that is taught, assessed, and attained in education for lifelong learning. In dental education, developing self-assessment is essential during the early stages of psychomotor learning. This study compared dental students' self-assessments and instructors' assessments in competency examinations and evaluated the progress and potential predictors of self-assessment performance, including achievement level and gender, in a Preclinical Operative Dentistry course.

Methods: The preclinical operative dentistry assessment and self-assessment records by instructors and students, respectively, were collected retrospectively from intra-semester and final examination assessment rubrics. The instructors' scoring agreement level was measured using inter-rater reliability and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Students' self-assessment data were compared with instructors' assessment data, and agreement was tested using inter-rater reliability estimates. The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: Instructors were calibrated based on significant agreement (p < 0.001) between full-time and part-time instructors (ICCs = 0.888 and 0.859, respectively). A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between instructors' and students' mean scores. Students' gender was significantly associated with their evaluation of performance in the intra-semester examination (p = 0.048). Most male students (58%) overestimated their performance, while the majority (44%) of female students tend to evaluate their performance accurately. There was no significant difference in the scoring of instructors and high achievers classified in the "excellent" category (p = 0.392).

Conclusion: In preclinical operative dentistry education, students' ability to accurately self-assess the quality of their work varies, and may be predicted by gender and achievement level. Students who underestimate their performance in self-assessment tend not to show improvement in their actual performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信