训练有素的足球运动员对使用运动专项技术进行间歇干预的适应性一致性比较分析。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hongjun Zhang, Sheng Li, Bingyuan Yang
{"title":"训练有素的足球运动员对使用运动专项技术进行间歇干预的适应性一致性比较分析。","authors":"Hongjun Zhang, Sheng Li, Bingyuan Yang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88531-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the uniformity of adaptive changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power to high-intensity interval interventions (HIIT) designed using techniques specified for soccer players. Thirty well-trained athletes (age = 25 ± 3.1 years; body mass = 82.4 ± 3.4 kg; height = 183 ± 2.1 cm) were randomly assigned to two experimental groups engaging in interval intervention individualized using 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test [HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> (two sets of 5-8 min intervals, comprising 15 s of running at 95% of V<sub>IFT</sub> followed by 15 s of passive recovery)], and small-sided game with matched timing (SSG [4 sets of 2.5-4 min 3 v 3 efforts]), as well as an active control group. Before and after a 6-week intervention consisting of three sessions per week, participants underwent a lab-based cardiorespiratory fitness test using breath-by-breath gas analyzer and non-invasive impedance cardiography to evaluate aerobic fitness and cardiac function measures. Also, anaerobic power was measured using lower-body Wingate test. Both interventions resulted in significant enhancement in all measures of cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power over the training period. Analyzing inter-individual variability through determining residuals in individual changes indicated HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> results in residuals in individual changes in ventilatory threshold (VT [first (VT<sub>1</sub>) and second (VT<sub>2</sub>)]), and peak and average power output than SSG (p = 0.02, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). In addition, the change in maximum oxygen uptake, maximal ventilation, and average power output following HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> was notably greater than SSG (p = 0.002, 0.006, and, 0.019, respectively). There was no significant difference between HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> and SSG in cardiac hemodynamics (cardiac output and stroke volume). Overall, by facilitating more homogenous stress, HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> results in more identical physiological demands and more uniform adaptations in ventilatory threshold and anaerobic power than SSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"4822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of consistency of adaptations to interval interventions individualized using sport-specific techniques in well-trained soccer players.\",\"authors\":\"Hongjun Zhang, Sheng Li, Bingyuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-88531-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the uniformity of adaptive changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power to high-intensity interval interventions (HIIT) designed using techniques specified for soccer players. Thirty well-trained athletes (age = 25 ± 3.1 years; body mass = 82.4 ± 3.4 kg; height = 183 ± 2.1 cm) were randomly assigned to two experimental groups engaging in interval intervention individualized using 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test [HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> (two sets of 5-8 min intervals, comprising 15 s of running at 95% of V<sub>IFT</sub> followed by 15 s of passive recovery)], and small-sided game with matched timing (SSG [4 sets of 2.5-4 min 3 v 3 efforts]), as well as an active control group. Before and after a 6-week intervention consisting of three sessions per week, participants underwent a lab-based cardiorespiratory fitness test using breath-by-breath gas analyzer and non-invasive impedance cardiography to evaluate aerobic fitness and cardiac function measures. Also, anaerobic power was measured using lower-body Wingate test. Both interventions resulted in significant enhancement in all measures of cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power over the training period. Analyzing inter-individual variability through determining residuals in individual changes indicated HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> results in residuals in individual changes in ventilatory threshold (VT [first (VT<sub>1</sub>) and second (VT<sub>2</sub>)]), and peak and average power output than SSG (p = 0.02, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). In addition, the change in maximum oxygen uptake, maximal ventilation, and average power output following HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> was notably greater than SSG (p = 0.002, 0.006, and, 0.019, respectively). There was no significant difference between HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> and SSG in cardiac hemodynamics (cardiac output and stroke volume). Overall, by facilitating more homogenous stress, HIITv<sub>IFT</sub> results in more identical physiological demands and more uniform adaptations in ventilatory threshold and anaerobic power than SSG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"4822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808104/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88531-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88531-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨心肺适能和无氧能力对高强度间歇干预(HIIT)的适应性变化的均匀性,该干预使用了为足球运动员设计的技术。30名训练有素的运动员(年龄= 25±3.1岁;体重= 82.4±3.4 kg;身高= 183±2.1 cm)的受试者,随机分为两组,分别进行间歇干预,分别采用30-15分钟间歇体能测试[HIITvIFT(两组5-8分钟的间歇体能测试,其中15秒以95%的速度跑步,然后15秒被动恢复)],以及匹配时间的小边游戏(SSG[4组2.5-4分钟3 v 3的努力]),以及积极对照组。在为期6周的干预(每周三次)之前和之后,参与者使用呼吸气体分析仪和无创阻抗心动图进行了基于实验室的心肺健康测试,以评估有氧健康和心功能测量。采用下体温盖特试验测定无氧能力。在训练期间,两种干预措施都显著提高了心肺适能和无氧能力的所有指标。通过测定个体变化的残差分析个体间变异性表明,HIITvIFT比SSG在通气阈值(VT[第一(VT1)和第二(VT2)])、峰值和平均输出功率方面产生残差(p分别= 0.02、0.04、0.02和0.01)。此外,HIITvIFT后最大摄氧量、最大通气量和平均功率输出的变化显著大于SSG (p分别= 0.002、0.006和0.019)。HIITvIFT和SSG在心脏血流动力学(心输出量和每搏量)方面无显著差异。总的来说,通过促进更均匀的应激,HIITvIFT比SSG产生更相同的生理需求和更均匀的通气阈值和厌氧功率适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of consistency of adaptations to interval interventions individualized using sport-specific techniques in well-trained soccer players.

Comparative analysis of consistency of adaptations to interval interventions individualized using sport-specific techniques in well-trained soccer players.

Comparative analysis of consistency of adaptations to interval interventions individualized using sport-specific techniques in well-trained soccer players.

Comparative analysis of consistency of adaptations to interval interventions individualized using sport-specific techniques in well-trained soccer players.

This study aimed to investigate the uniformity of adaptive changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power to high-intensity interval interventions (HIIT) designed using techniques specified for soccer players. Thirty well-trained athletes (age = 25 ± 3.1 years; body mass = 82.4 ± 3.4 kg; height = 183 ± 2.1 cm) were randomly assigned to two experimental groups engaging in interval intervention individualized using 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test [HIITvIFT (two sets of 5-8 min intervals, comprising 15 s of running at 95% of VIFT followed by 15 s of passive recovery)], and small-sided game with matched timing (SSG [4 sets of 2.5-4 min 3 v 3 efforts]), as well as an active control group. Before and after a 6-week intervention consisting of three sessions per week, participants underwent a lab-based cardiorespiratory fitness test using breath-by-breath gas analyzer and non-invasive impedance cardiography to evaluate aerobic fitness and cardiac function measures. Also, anaerobic power was measured using lower-body Wingate test. Both interventions resulted in significant enhancement in all measures of cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power over the training period. Analyzing inter-individual variability through determining residuals in individual changes indicated HIITvIFT results in residuals in individual changes in ventilatory threshold (VT [first (VT1) and second (VT2)]), and peak and average power output than SSG (p = 0.02, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). In addition, the change in maximum oxygen uptake, maximal ventilation, and average power output following HIITvIFT was notably greater than SSG (p = 0.002, 0.006, and, 0.019, respectively). There was no significant difference between HIITvIFT and SSG in cardiac hemodynamics (cardiac output and stroke volume). Overall, by facilitating more homogenous stress, HIITvIFT results in more identical physiological demands and more uniform adaptations in ventilatory threshold and anaerobic power than SSG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信