一个可行的治疗策略,逐渐减少皮下托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一个24个月的多中心回顾性研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Takanori Ito, Sho Fukui, Fumika N Nagase, Toshihiro Yamaguchi, Nobuhiro Oda, Hajime Inokuchi, Masei Suda, Naoho Takizawa, Yasuhiro Suyama, Ryo Rokutanda, Atsushi Nomura, Eishi Uechi, Yoichiro Haji, Hiromichi Tamaki
{"title":"一个可行的治疗策略,逐渐减少皮下托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一个24个月的多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Takanori Ito, Sho Fukui, Fumika N Nagase, Toshihiro Yamaguchi, Nobuhiro Oda, Hajime Inokuchi, Masei Suda, Naoho Takizawa, Yasuhiro Suyama, Ryo Rokutanda, Atsushi Nomura, Eishi Uechi, Yoichiro Haji, Hiromichi Tamaki","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05796-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine whether extending tocilizumab (TCZ) intervals is a feasible treatment strategy in giant cell arteritis (GCA). This multicenter retrospective study included patients with GCA who started subcutaneous TCZ at five Japanese hospitals between January 2008 and July 2021. We collected clinical data and monitored relapses for up to 24 months following the initiation of TCZ. The treatment regimen, including TCZ intervals and glucocorticoid (GC) dosage, was evaluated every 6 months. Of 56 eligible patients, 44 (79%) initiated TCZ weekly, and 12 (21%) every two weeks. The GC dosage consistently decreased after initiating TCZ; GC discontinuation was achieved in 87.5% at month 24. The number of patients extending TCZ intervals increased over time. Among the 32 patients who were followed at month 24, 5 (15.6%) continued weekly TCZ; the TCZ interval was every two weeks in 13 (40.6%), every three weeks in 7 (21.9%), and every four weeks or longer in 5 (15.6%), and 2 (6.3%) discontinued TCZ due to well-controlled disease. During 24-month follow-up, 10 (31.3%) extended TCZ intervals by two weeks or more from the starting dose. Three patients experienced relapses after extending TCZ intervals for well-controlled GCA, and all improved by shortening TCZ intervals. Gradually extending TCZ intervals by one week each is a feasible treatment strategy for well-controlled GCA patients after achieving GC-free status. While some patients may experience relapses following the extension of TCZ intervals, these relapses might be potentially managed by adjusting only the TCZ intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feasible treatment strategy for tapering subcutaneous tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: a 24-month multi-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Ito, Sho Fukui, Fumika N Nagase, Toshihiro Yamaguchi, Nobuhiro Oda, Hajime Inokuchi, Masei Suda, Naoho Takizawa, Yasuhiro Suyama, Ryo Rokutanda, Atsushi Nomura, Eishi Uechi, Yoichiro Haji, Hiromichi Tamaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05796-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To examine whether extending tocilizumab (TCZ) intervals is a feasible treatment strategy in giant cell arteritis (GCA). This multicenter retrospective study included patients with GCA who started subcutaneous TCZ at five Japanese hospitals between January 2008 and July 2021. We collected clinical data and monitored relapses for up to 24 months following the initiation of TCZ. The treatment regimen, including TCZ intervals and glucocorticoid (GC) dosage, was evaluated every 6 months. Of 56 eligible patients, 44 (79%) initiated TCZ weekly, and 12 (21%) every two weeks. The GC dosage consistently decreased after initiating TCZ; GC discontinuation was achieved in 87.5% at month 24. The number of patients extending TCZ intervals increased over time. Among the 32 patients who were followed at month 24, 5 (15.6%) continued weekly TCZ; the TCZ interval was every two weeks in 13 (40.6%), every three weeks in 7 (21.9%), and every four weeks or longer in 5 (15.6%), and 2 (6.3%) discontinued TCZ due to well-controlled disease. During 24-month follow-up, 10 (31.3%) extended TCZ intervals by two weeks or more from the starting dose. Three patients experienced relapses after extending TCZ intervals for well-controlled GCA, and all improved by shortening TCZ intervals. Gradually extending TCZ intervals by one week each is a feasible treatment strategy for well-controlled GCA patients after achieving GC-free status. While some patients may experience relapses following the extension of TCZ intervals, these relapses might be potentially managed by adjusting only the TCZ intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05796-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05796-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨延长托珠单抗(TCZ)治疗间隔是否是巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的可行治疗策略。这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2008年1月至2021年7月间在日本五家医院开始皮下TCZ治疗的GCA患者。我们收集了临床数据,并监测了TCZ开始后长达24个月的复发情况。每6个月评估一次治疗方案,包括TCZ间隔和糖皮质激素(GC)剂量。在56例符合条件的患者中,44例(79%)每周接受TCZ治疗,12例(21%)每两周接受一次。启动TCZ后GC用量持续下降;24个月时,87.5%的患者停药。延长TCZ间隔的患者数量随着时间的推移而增加。在第24个月随访的32例患者中,5例(15.6%)持续每周TCZ;13例(40.6%)TCZ间隔为每2周一次,7例(21.9%)为每3周一次,5例(15.6%)为每4周或更长时间一次,2例(6.3%)因疾病控制良好而中断TCZ。在24个月的随访中,10人(31.3%)将TCZ间隔从起始剂量延长了两周或更长时间。3例患者在延长控制良好的GCA的TCZ间隔后出现复发,所有患者均通过缩短TCZ间隔得到改善。对于控制良好的GCA患者,在达到无gc状态后,逐步延长TCZ间隔,每次延长一周是可行的治疗策略。虽然有些患者可能会在TCZ间隔延长后出现复发,但这些复发可能仅通过调整TCZ间隔来控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A feasible treatment strategy for tapering subcutaneous tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: a 24-month multi-center retrospective study.

To examine whether extending tocilizumab (TCZ) intervals is a feasible treatment strategy in giant cell arteritis (GCA). This multicenter retrospective study included patients with GCA who started subcutaneous TCZ at five Japanese hospitals between January 2008 and July 2021. We collected clinical data and monitored relapses for up to 24 months following the initiation of TCZ. The treatment regimen, including TCZ intervals and glucocorticoid (GC) dosage, was evaluated every 6 months. Of 56 eligible patients, 44 (79%) initiated TCZ weekly, and 12 (21%) every two weeks. The GC dosage consistently decreased after initiating TCZ; GC discontinuation was achieved in 87.5% at month 24. The number of patients extending TCZ intervals increased over time. Among the 32 patients who were followed at month 24, 5 (15.6%) continued weekly TCZ; the TCZ interval was every two weeks in 13 (40.6%), every three weeks in 7 (21.9%), and every four weeks or longer in 5 (15.6%), and 2 (6.3%) discontinued TCZ due to well-controlled disease. During 24-month follow-up, 10 (31.3%) extended TCZ intervals by two weeks or more from the starting dose. Three patients experienced relapses after extending TCZ intervals for well-controlled GCA, and all improved by shortening TCZ intervals. Gradually extending TCZ intervals by one week each is a feasible treatment strategy for well-controlled GCA patients after achieving GC-free status. While some patients may experience relapses following the extension of TCZ intervals, these relapses might be potentially managed by adjusting only the TCZ intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信