卵巢储备测量的临床应用。

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Katherine M Baker, Rodolfo FernandezCriado, Jennifer L Eaton, Virginia A Mensah
{"title":"卵巢储备测量的临床应用。","authors":"Katherine M Baker, Rodolfo FernandezCriado, Jennifer L Eaton, Virginia A Mensah","doi":"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as \"fertility tests.\" It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as \"fertility tests.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as \"fertility tests.\" Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"80 2","pages":"121-133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Utility of Measures of Ovarian Reserve.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine M Baker, Rodolfo FernandezCriado, Jennifer L Eaton, Virginia A Mensah\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as \\\"fertility tests.\\\" It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as \\\"fertility tests.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as \\\"fertility tests.\\\" Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"121-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:卵巢储备的测量,特别是抗勒氏激素,已经越来越多地被不准确地用作“生育测试”。重要的是要了解卵巢储备的可用措施,以及如何正确地解释和整合其应用到临床实践。目的:本文的目的是回顾生殖衰老的过程,卵巢储备的定义,描述卵巢储备的可用措施,并讨论这些措施的临床应用。证据获取:使用PubMed电子数据库进行文献检索。本文综述了有关卵巢储备参数及其临床应用的相关指南、系统综述和原创研究文章。结果:随着生育年龄的增加,女性生育能力逐渐下降,卵母细胞数量和质量下降。卵巢储备是指卵巢中保留的卵母细胞数量。卵巢储备可通过血清血液检查或超声成像间接测量。卵巢储备的测量在临床上在一些情况下是有用的,特别是在生育治疗和辅助生殖技术周期中使用。然而,卵巢储备的测量不能很好地预测生殖潜力,不应该用作“生育测试”。结论和相关性:卵巢储备指标不能很好地预测生殖潜力,不应作为“生育能力测试”。与卵巢储备相比,年龄仍然是生殖成功的一个更强的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clinical Utility of Measures of Ovarian Reserve.

Importance: Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as "fertility tests." It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice.

Objectives: The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures.

Evidence acquisition: A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed.

Results: The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests."

Conclusions and relevance: Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信