复杂腹部:一个范围审查。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6
C Stabilini, S Capoccia Giovannini, G Campanelli, G Cavallaro, U Bracale, G Soliani, F Pecchini, M Frascio, F Carlini, G Longo, A Rubartelli, G Camerini
{"title":"复杂腹部:一个范围审查。","authors":"C Stabilini, S Capoccia Giovannini, G Campanelli, G Cavallaro, U Bracale, G Soliani, F Pecchini, M Frascio, F Carlini, G Longo, A Rubartelli, G Camerini","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence on the surgical management of complex abdominal wall hernias (CA), focusing on patient-specific factors, hernia characteristics, contamination and operative strategies to their management, in order to identify research gaps and areas for clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, covering publications from January 2015 to June 2024. A total of 6,445 articles were identified, of which 357 met inclusion criteria (303 primary studies and 54 systematic reviews). Studies were classified into three categories: patient-related factors (P), hernia-specific features (H), and contamination (W).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-related factors, particularly obesity and associated comorbidities, were consistently related to higher rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence despite prehabilitation and bariatric surgery were evaluated, results were inconclusive. Hernia-specific features, including large defect size and loss of domain, were associated with increased complication rates. Midline restoration and its achievement with component separation or preoperative botulinum toxin injections, were extensively studied, showing potential benefits. In contaminated settings, synthetic meshes outperformed biologic alternatives, demonstrating lower recurrence and morbidity rates in recent trials. Research in biosynthetic mesh is still needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical management of CA remains a highly demanding clinical scenario with significant variability in outcomes influenced by patient factors and hernia characteristics. Techniques such as component separation and the use of synthetic meshes hold promise, but further high-quality, randomized trials are required to establish standardized protocols and optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex abdomen: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"C Stabilini, S Capoccia Giovannini, G Campanelli, G Cavallaro, U Bracale, G Soliani, F Pecchini, M Frascio, F Carlini, G Longo, A Rubartelli, G Camerini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence on the surgical management of complex abdominal wall hernias (CA), focusing on patient-specific factors, hernia characteristics, contamination and operative strategies to their management, in order to identify research gaps and areas for clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, covering publications from January 2015 to June 2024. A total of 6,445 articles were identified, of which 357 met inclusion criteria (303 primary studies and 54 systematic reviews). Studies were classified into three categories: patient-related factors (P), hernia-specific features (H), and contamination (W).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-related factors, particularly obesity and associated comorbidities, were consistently related to higher rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence despite prehabilitation and bariatric surgery were evaluated, results were inconclusive. Hernia-specific features, including large defect size and loss of domain, were associated with increased complication rates. Midline restoration and its achievement with component separation or preoperative botulinum toxin injections, were extensively studied, showing potential benefits. In contaminated settings, synthetic meshes outperformed biologic alternatives, demonstrating lower recurrence and morbidity rates in recent trials. Research in biosynthetic mesh is still needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical management of CA remains a highly demanding clinical scenario with significant variability in outcomes influenced by patient factors and hernia characteristics. Techniques such as component separation and the use of synthetic meshes hold promise, but further high-quality, randomized trials are required to establish standardized protocols and optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在系统地绘制复杂腹壁疝(CA)手术治疗的现有证据,重点关注患者特异性因素、疝特征、污染和手术治疗策略,以确定研究空白和临床改进的领域。方法:在PubMed和Scopus中进行综合文献检索,检索时间为2015年1月至2024年6月。共纳入6445篇文献,其中357篇符合纳入标准(303篇初步研究和54篇系统综述)。研究分为三类:患者相关因素(P),疝气特异性特征(H)和污染(W)。结果:患者相关因素,特别是肥胖和相关合并症,始终与较高的发病率和疝气复发率相关,尽管对预康复和减肥手术进行了评估,但结果尚无定论。疝特异性特征,包括大的缺陷大小和区域丧失,与并发症发生率增加有关。中线修复及其通过成分分离或术前注射肉毒杆菌毒素的实现被广泛研究,显示出潜在的益处。在污染环境中,合成网优于生物替代品,在最近的试验中显示出较低的复发率和发病率。生物合成网的研究仍有必要。结论:CA的手术治疗仍然是一个非常苛刻的临床方案,其结果受患者因素和疝特征的影响有很大的差异。组分分离和合成网的使用等技术前景光明,但需要进一步的高质量随机试验来建立标准化的方案,并在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中优化临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex abdomen: a scoping review.

Purpose: This scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing evidence on the surgical management of complex abdominal wall hernias (CA), focusing on patient-specific factors, hernia characteristics, contamination and operative strategies to their management, in order to identify research gaps and areas for clinical improvement.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, covering publications from January 2015 to June 2024. A total of 6,445 articles were identified, of which 357 met inclusion criteria (303 primary studies and 54 systematic reviews). Studies were classified into three categories: patient-related factors (P), hernia-specific features (H), and contamination (W).

Results: Patient-related factors, particularly obesity and associated comorbidities, were consistently related to higher rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence despite prehabilitation and bariatric surgery were evaluated, results were inconclusive. Hernia-specific features, including large defect size and loss of domain, were associated with increased complication rates. Midline restoration and its achievement with component separation or preoperative botulinum toxin injections, were extensively studied, showing potential benefits. In contaminated settings, synthetic meshes outperformed biologic alternatives, demonstrating lower recurrence and morbidity rates in recent trials. Research in biosynthetic mesh is still needed.

Conclusion: Surgical management of CA remains a highly demanding clinical scenario with significant variability in outcomes influenced by patient factors and hernia characteristics. Techniques such as component separation and the use of synthetic meshes hold promise, but further high-quality, randomized trials are required to establish standardized protocols and optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信