血栓弹性测定法和两种活化凝血试验检测心脏手术患者鱼精蛋白后残留肝素:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002122
Janne Moilanen, Marika Pada, Pasi Ohtonen, Timo Kaakinen, Panu Taskinen, Eeva-Riitta Savolainen, Tiina Erkinaro
{"title":"血栓弹性测定法和两种活化凝血试验检测心脏手术患者鱼精蛋白后残留肝素:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Janne Moilanen, Marika Pada, Pasi Ohtonen, Timo Kaakinen, Panu Taskinen, Eeva-Riitta Savolainen, Tiina Erkinaro","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After cardiac surgery, complete heparin reversal with protamine is essential. Accordingly, there is a need for an accurate and precise point-of-care device to detect possible residual heparin after protamine administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare two different activated clotting time (ACT) tests and thromboelastometry in detecting postprotamine heparin activity after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre prospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital from September 2021 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty-five adult, elective cardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device, and the coagulation time (CT) ratio from INTEM and HEPTEM tests of ROTEM Sigma device, were analysed after protamine administration and compared to baseline values.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Based on postprotamine antifactor Xa (anti-fXa) activity, the patients were divided into heparin (anti-fXa ≥0.2 IU ml -1 ) and no heparin (anti-fXa ≤0.1 IU ml -1 ) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a mean bias of 44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 47] celite seconds between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements. The absolute changes in ACT-LR, ACT+ and INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio were variable and did not differ between the groups. The mean ± SD percentage changes between postprotamine and baseline ACT-LR and ACT+ values were 5.9 ± 17.5 and 5.9 ± 16.9% in the no residual heparin group, compared to 1.4 ± 8.4 and 9.9 ± 12.5% in the residual heparin group. Receiver operator characteristic curves for postprotamine INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio and for percentage changes in ACT-LR and ACT+ to detect an anti-fXa at least 0.2 IU ml -1 had areas under the curve of 0.496 (95% CI, 0.329 to 0.663), 0.425 (95% CI, 0.260 to 0.591) and 0.583 (95% CI, 0.417 to 0.749), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device and the INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio of ROTEM Sigma device have poor ability to detect residual heparin shortly after protamine administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"398-406"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thromboelastometry and two activated clotting tests in detecting residual heparin after protamine in cardiac surgical patients: A prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Janne Moilanen, Marika Pada, Pasi Ohtonen, Timo Kaakinen, Panu Taskinen, Eeva-Riitta Savolainen, Tiina Erkinaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After cardiac surgery, complete heparin reversal with protamine is essential. Accordingly, there is a need for an accurate and precise point-of-care device to detect possible residual heparin after protamine administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare two different activated clotting time (ACT) tests and thromboelastometry in detecting postprotamine heparin activity after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre prospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital from September 2021 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty-five adult, elective cardiac surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device, and the coagulation time (CT) ratio from INTEM and HEPTEM tests of ROTEM Sigma device, were analysed after protamine administration and compared to baseline values.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Based on postprotamine antifactor Xa (anti-fXa) activity, the patients were divided into heparin (anti-fXa ≥0.2 IU ml -1 ) and no heparin (anti-fXa ≤0.1 IU ml -1 ) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a mean bias of 44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 47] celite seconds between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements. The absolute changes in ACT-LR, ACT+ and INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio were variable and did not differ between the groups. The mean ± SD percentage changes between postprotamine and baseline ACT-LR and ACT+ values were 5.9 ± 17.5 and 5.9 ± 16.9% in the no residual heparin group, compared to 1.4 ± 8.4 and 9.9 ± 12.5% in the residual heparin group. Receiver operator characteristic curves for postprotamine INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio and for percentage changes in ACT-LR and ACT+ to detect an anti-fXa at least 0.2 IU ml -1 had areas under the curve of 0.496 (95% CI, 0.329 to 0.663), 0.425 (95% CI, 0.260 to 0.591) and 0.583 (95% CI, 0.417 to 0.749), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device and the INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio of ROTEM Sigma device have poor ability to detect residual heparin shortly after protamine administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"398-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏手术后,鱼精蛋白完全逆转肝素是必要的。因此,需要一种精确的护理设备来检测鱼精蛋白给药后可能残留的肝素。目的:比较两种不同的活化凝血时间(ACT)试验和血栓弹性测定法检测心脏手术后鱼精蛋白后肝素活性。设计:单中心前瞻性观察性研究。地点:2021年9月至2023年2月,大学附属医院。参与者:55名成人择期心脏手术患者。干预措施:分析鱼精蛋白给药后的血凝时间(CT)比,并与基线值进行比较,分析haemchron Signature Elite装置的ACT- lr和ACT+试验,以及ROTEM Sigma装置的INTEM和HEPTEM试验。主要观察指标:根据鱼精蛋白后抗因子Xa(抗- fxa)活性分为肝素组(抗- fxa≥0.2 IU ml-1)和无肝素组(抗- fxa≤0.1 IU ml-1)。结果:ACT- lr和ACT+测量之间的平均偏差为44[95%置信区间(CI) 40至47]celite秒。ACT- lr、ACT+和interm:HEPTEM CT比值的绝对变化是可变的,各组间无差异。无残留肝素组鱼精蛋白后与基线ACT- lr和ACT+值的平均±SD百分比变化分别为5.9±17.5和5.9±16.9%,而残留肝素组为1.4±8.4和9.9±12.5%。鱼精蛋白后INTEM:HEPTEM CT比值和ACT- lr和ACT+检测抗fxa≥0.2 IU ml-1的百分比变化的受试者操作符特征曲线下面积分别为0.496 (95% CI, 0.329 ~ 0.663)、0.425 (95% CI, 0.260 ~ 0.591)和0.583 (95% CI, 0.417 ~ 0.749)。结论:hemchron Signature Elite装置的ACT- lr和ACT+试验以及ROTEM Sigma装置的INTEM:HEPTEM CT比值对鱼精蛋白给药后不久残留肝素的检测能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thromboelastometry and two activated clotting tests in detecting residual heparin after protamine in cardiac surgical patients: A prospective cohort study.

Background: After cardiac surgery, complete heparin reversal with protamine is essential. Accordingly, there is a need for an accurate and precise point-of-care device to detect possible residual heparin after protamine administration.

Objectives: To compare two different activated clotting time (ACT) tests and thromboelastometry in detecting postprotamine heparin activity after cardiac surgery.

Design: A single-centre prospective, observational study.

Setting: University Hospital from September 2021 to February 2023.

Participants: Fifty-five adult, elective cardiac surgical patients.

Interventions: The ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device, and the coagulation time (CT) ratio from INTEM and HEPTEM tests of ROTEM Sigma device, were analysed after protamine administration and compared to baseline values.

Main outcome measures: Based on postprotamine antifactor Xa (anti-fXa) activity, the patients were divided into heparin (anti-fXa ≥0.2 IU ml -1 ) and no heparin (anti-fXa ≤0.1 IU ml -1 ) groups.

Results: There was a mean bias of 44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 47] celite seconds between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements. The absolute changes in ACT-LR, ACT+ and INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio were variable and did not differ between the groups. The mean ± SD percentage changes between postprotamine and baseline ACT-LR and ACT+ values were 5.9 ± 17.5 and 5.9 ± 16.9% in the no residual heparin group, compared to 1.4 ± 8.4 and 9.9 ± 12.5% in the residual heparin group. Receiver operator characteristic curves for postprotamine INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio and for percentage changes in ACT-LR and ACT+ to detect an anti-fXa at least 0.2 IU ml -1 had areas under the curve of 0.496 (95% CI, 0.329 to 0.663), 0.425 (95% CI, 0.260 to 0.591) and 0.583 (95% CI, 0.417 to 0.749), respectively.

Conclusion: Both the ACT-LR and ACT+ tests of Hemochron Signature Elite device and the INTEM:HEPTEM CT ratio of ROTEM Sigma device have poor ability to detect residual heparin shortly after protamine administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信