{"title":"OnabotulinumtoxinA for primary new daily persistent headache and comparison to chronic migraine.","authors":"Sanjay Cheema, Susie Lagrata, Khadija Rerhou Rantell, Maha Ahmed, Salwa Kamourieh, Manjit Singh Matharu","doi":"10.1177/03331024251317448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is an often treatment-refractory primary headache disorder with a lack of evidence base for treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational study using prospectively collected data in consecutive patients with NDPH, chronic migraine with daily headache (daily-CM) and without daily headache (non-daily-CM). Patients were treated with two cycles of OnabotulinumtoxinA. Propensity score matching was used to control for imbalances between the groups. The primary outcome measure was the proportion who experienced a ≥ 30% improvement in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 58 patients with NDPH, 148 with daily-CM, and 84 with non-daily-CM. In NDPH, 34.5% of patients experienced a ≥ 30% improvement in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days, compared to 43.2% in daily-CM and 51.2% in non-daily CM. In NDPH, 6.9% experienced an improvement in monthly headache days, 27.6% an improvement in headache severity, 25.9% a ≥ 6 point improvement in HIT-6 score, and 59% a patient reported improvement. There was no significant difference in response rates between the three groups. Adverse event rates were similar in all groups and there were no serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OnabotulinumtoxinA is effective in approximately 1/3 patients with NDPH and has a favourable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 2","pages":"3331024251317448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251317448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
OnabotulinumtoxinA for primary new daily persistent headache and comparison to chronic migraine.
Background: New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is an often treatment-refractory primary headache disorder with a lack of evidence base for treatment.
Methods: We performed an observational study using prospectively collected data in consecutive patients with NDPH, chronic migraine with daily headache (daily-CM) and without daily headache (non-daily-CM). Patients were treated with two cycles of OnabotulinumtoxinA. Propensity score matching was used to control for imbalances between the groups. The primary outcome measure was the proportion who experienced a ≥ 30% improvement in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days at 24 weeks.
Results: We included 58 patients with NDPH, 148 with daily-CM, and 84 with non-daily-CM. In NDPH, 34.5% of patients experienced a ≥ 30% improvement in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days, compared to 43.2% in daily-CM and 51.2% in non-daily CM. In NDPH, 6.9% experienced an improvement in monthly headache days, 27.6% an improvement in headache severity, 25.9% a ≥ 6 point improvement in HIT-6 score, and 59% a patient reported improvement. There was no significant difference in response rates between the three groups. Adverse event rates were similar in all groups and there were no serious adverse events.
Conclusion: OnabotulinumtoxinA is effective in approximately 1/3 patients with NDPH and has a favourable safety profile.
期刊介绍:
Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.