Jonathan Misch, Sawsan Abu-Reyal, Danyal Lohana, Obada Mandil, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Junying Li, Hom-Lay Wang, Andrea Ravidà
{"title":"基台高度和修复体出现角度对种植体周围骨丢失进展的综合影响:回顾性分析。","authors":"Jonathan Misch, Sawsan Abu-Reyal, Danyal Lohana, Obada Mandil, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Junying Li, Hom-Lay Wang, Andrea Ravidà","doi":"10.1111/clr.14408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the combined effect of trans-mucosal abutment height (TmAH) and restorative emergence angle (REA) on marginal bone loss (MBL) around bone-level implants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Implant radiographs 12–18 months after crown placement (T0) and at least one year later (T1) were retrospectively analyzed. Sites were separated into four groups: Long/Narrow-Angle (LN) with TmAH <span>></span> 2 mm and REA < 30°, Long/Wide-Angle (LW) with TmAH <span>></span> 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°, Short/Narrow-Angle (SN) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA < 30°, and Short/Wide-Angle (SW) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°. MBL was calculated, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to control for patient-level and implant/prosthesis-level factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>192 implants pertaining to 119 patients were included. Group significantly influenced MBL experience (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Group SW experienced on average 0.48 mm (95% CI: 0.25–0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 0.43 mm (95% CI: 0.18–0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and 0.25 mm (95% CI: 0.00–0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.013) greater MBL compared to Groups LN, LW, and SN, respectively. Group was also a significant factor impacting the development of peri-implantitis (<i>p</i> = 0.041), with Group SW displaying a roughly 4× greater likelihood of having peri-implantitis (PI) diagnosed compared to Groups LN (OR: 4.04; <i>p</i> = 0.091) and LW (OR: 4.19; <i>p</i> = 0.013). Every 1 mm increase in TmAH significantly decreased the likelihood of MBL > 0 mm (OR = 0.63; <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Abutment height <span>></span> 2 mm may play a role in reducing PI and MBL related to ≥ 30° REA around bone-level implants. REA was found to only be a significant factor when TmAH is less than 2 mm.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 5","pages":"600-612"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14408","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Effect of Abutment Height and Restoration Emergence Angle on Peri-Implant Bone Loss Progression: A Retrospective Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Misch, Sawsan Abu-Reyal, Danyal Lohana, Obada Mandil, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Junying Li, Hom-Lay Wang, Andrea Ravidà\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate the combined effect of trans-mucosal abutment height (TmAH) and restorative emergence angle (REA) on marginal bone loss (MBL) around bone-level implants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implant radiographs 12–18 months after crown placement (T0) and at least one year later (T1) were retrospectively analyzed. Sites were separated into four groups: Long/Narrow-Angle (LN) with TmAH <span>></span> 2 mm and REA < 30°, Long/Wide-Angle (LW) with TmAH <span>></span> 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°, Short/Narrow-Angle (SN) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA < 30°, and Short/Wide-Angle (SW) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°. MBL was calculated, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to control for patient-level and implant/prosthesis-level factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>192 implants pertaining to 119 patients were included. Group significantly influenced MBL experience (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Group SW experienced on average 0.48 mm (95% CI: 0.25–0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 0.43 mm (95% CI: 0.18–0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and 0.25 mm (95% CI: 0.00–0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.013) greater MBL compared to Groups LN, LW, and SN, respectively. Group was also a significant factor impacting the development of peri-implantitis (<i>p</i> = 0.041), with Group SW displaying a roughly 4× greater likelihood of having peri-implantitis (PI) diagnosed compared to Groups LN (OR: 4.04; <i>p</i> = 0.091) and LW (OR: 4.19; <i>p</i> = 0.013). Every 1 mm increase in TmAH significantly decreased the likelihood of MBL > 0 mm (OR = 0.63; <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Abutment height <span>></span> 2 mm may play a role in reducing PI and MBL related to ≥ 30° REA around bone-level implants. REA was found to only be a significant factor when TmAH is less than 2 mm.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"600-612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14408\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined Effect of Abutment Height and Restoration Emergence Angle on Peri-Implant Bone Loss Progression: A Retrospective Analysis
Introduction
This study aimed to investigate the combined effect of trans-mucosal abutment height (TmAH) and restorative emergence angle (REA) on marginal bone loss (MBL) around bone-level implants.
Methods
Implant radiographs 12–18 months after crown placement (T0) and at least one year later (T1) were retrospectively analyzed. Sites were separated into four groups: Long/Narrow-Angle (LN) with TmAH > 2 mm and REA < 30°, Long/Wide-Angle (LW) with TmAH > 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°, Short/Narrow-Angle (SN) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA < 30°, and Short/Wide-Angle (SW) with TmAH < 2 mm and REA ≥ 30°. MBL was calculated, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to control for patient-level and implant/prosthesis-level factors.
Results
192 implants pertaining to 119 patients were included. Group significantly influenced MBL experience (p < 0.001). Group SW experienced on average 0.48 mm (95% CI: 0.25–0.71, p < 0.001), 0.43 mm (95% CI: 0.18–0.68, p = 0.001), and 0.25 mm (95% CI: 0.00–0.45, p = 0.013) greater MBL compared to Groups LN, LW, and SN, respectively. Group was also a significant factor impacting the development of peri-implantitis (p = 0.041), with Group SW displaying a roughly 4× greater likelihood of having peri-implantitis (PI) diagnosed compared to Groups LN (OR: 4.04; p = 0.091) and LW (OR: 4.19; p = 0.013). Every 1 mm increase in TmAH significantly decreased the likelihood of MBL > 0 mm (OR = 0.63; p = 0.003).
Conclusions
Abutment height > 2 mm may play a role in reducing PI and MBL related to ≥ 30° REA around bone-level implants. REA was found to only be a significant factor when TmAH is less than 2 mm.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.