Wanting Dai, Ayub M. O. Oduor, Chaodan Guo, Zhanjun Quan, Junsheng Li, Caiyun Zhao
{"title":"道路距离、生境类型和环境因子预测地上植被和土壤种子库中入侵和本地植物的分布","authors":"Wanting Dai, Ayub M. O. Oduor, Chaodan Guo, Zhanjun Quan, Junsheng Li, Caiyun Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Road networks are common landscape disturbances that can facilitate the spread of invasive plants. This study explored the influence of distance from the road, habitat type and broader environmental factors in shaping the distribution patterns of both invasive and native species in the above-ground vegetation and soil seed banks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Guangxi, China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We collected data on plant species composition from both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation at six distances from the road edge: 0 m, 2 m, 4 m, 9 m, 14 m and 24 m in three habitat types, including abandoned land, <i>Eucalyptus</i> plantations and natural secondary forests. We collected data on environmental variables at each sampling location. We examined the compositional similarity of plant communities by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and identified the influence factors by redundancy analysis (RDA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicated that invasive species richness decreased with distance from the road, especially in natural secondary forests. Conversely, native species did not show consistent distribution patterns relative to distance from roads across the various habitats. The composition of invasive plant communities was similar in both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation, while only 13.33% of native species identified in the soil were observed in the above-ground vegetation. Road characteristics, human disturbance and soil properties correlated with the distribution of invasive and native species, with the strength of these correlations varying among habitat types. The richness and density of native plants were associated with the presence of invasive alien plants at various distances from the road across the three types of habitats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights that proximity to the road, habitat type and environmental factors are critical in determining the distribution of plant species within nature reserves. Moreover, it underscores the importance of integrating both above-ground and seed bank perspectives for effective management strategies to control invasive species and promote native plant communities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distance From the Road, Habitat Type and Environmental Factors Predict Distribution of Invasive and Native Plant Species in the Above-Ground Vegetation and Soil Seedbanks\",\"authors\":\"Wanting Dai, Ayub M. O. Oduor, Chaodan Guo, Zhanjun Quan, Junsheng Li, Caiyun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Road networks are common landscape disturbances that can facilitate the spread of invasive plants. This study explored the influence of distance from the road, habitat type and broader environmental factors in shaping the distribution patterns of both invasive and native species in the above-ground vegetation and soil seed banks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Guangxi, China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We collected data on plant species composition from both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation at six distances from the road edge: 0 m, 2 m, 4 m, 9 m, 14 m and 24 m in three habitat types, including abandoned land, <i>Eucalyptus</i> plantations and natural secondary forests. We collected data on environmental variables at each sampling location. We examined the compositional similarity of plant communities by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and identified the influence factors by redundancy analysis (RDA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results indicated that invasive species richness decreased with distance from the road, especially in natural secondary forests. Conversely, native species did not show consistent distribution patterns relative to distance from roads across the various habitats. The composition of invasive plant communities was similar in both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation, while only 13.33% of native species identified in the soil were observed in the above-ground vegetation. Road characteristics, human disturbance and soil properties correlated with the distribution of invasive and native species, with the strength of these correlations varying among habitat types. The richness and density of native plants were associated with the presence of invasive alien plants at various distances from the road across the three types of habitats.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study highlights that proximity to the road, habitat type and environmental factors are critical in determining the distribution of plant species within nature reserves. Moreover, it underscores the importance of integrating both above-ground and seed bank perspectives for effective management strategies to control invasive species and promote native plant communities.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
道路网络是常见的景观干扰,可以促进入侵植物的传播。本研究探讨了道路距离、生境类型和更广泛的环境因素对地上植被和土壤种子库中入侵物种和本地物种分布格局的影响。地理位置:中国广西。方法在距离道路边缘0 m、2 m、4 m、9 m、14 m和24 m 6个距离的3种生境类型(撂荒地、桉树人工林和天然次生林)中收集土壤种子库和地上植被的植物种类组成数据。我们收集了每个采样地点的环境变量数据。采用非度量多维尺度(NMDS)分析了植物群落的组成相似性,并通过冗余分析(RDA)确定了影响植物群落组成相似性的因素。结果入侵物种丰富度随距离公路的远近而降低,特别是在天然次生林中。相反,本地物种在不同生境中与道路距离的分布模式不一致。土壤种子库中入侵植物群落组成与地上植被相似,地上植被中只有13.33%的本地物种存在。道路特征、人为干扰和土壤性质与入侵物种和本地物种的分布相关,且这些相关性的强度因生境类型而异。本地植物的丰富度和密度与距离道路不同距离的外来入侵植物的存在有关。研究表明,与道路的接近程度、生境类型和环境因素是决定自然保护区植物种类分布的关键因素。此外,它强调了将地上和种子库结合起来的重要性,以有效地管理策略来控制入侵物种和促进本地植物群落。
Distance From the Road, Habitat Type and Environmental Factors Predict Distribution of Invasive and Native Plant Species in the Above-Ground Vegetation and Soil Seedbanks
Aim
Road networks are common landscape disturbances that can facilitate the spread of invasive plants. This study explored the influence of distance from the road, habitat type and broader environmental factors in shaping the distribution patterns of both invasive and native species in the above-ground vegetation and soil seed banks.
Location
Guangxi, China.
Methods
We collected data on plant species composition from both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation at six distances from the road edge: 0 m, 2 m, 4 m, 9 m, 14 m and 24 m in three habitat types, including abandoned land, Eucalyptus plantations and natural secondary forests. We collected data on environmental variables at each sampling location. We examined the compositional similarity of plant communities by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and identified the influence factors by redundancy analysis (RDA).
Results
Our results indicated that invasive species richness decreased with distance from the road, especially in natural secondary forests. Conversely, native species did not show consistent distribution patterns relative to distance from roads across the various habitats. The composition of invasive plant communities was similar in both soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation, while only 13.33% of native species identified in the soil were observed in the above-ground vegetation. Road characteristics, human disturbance and soil properties correlated with the distribution of invasive and native species, with the strength of these correlations varying among habitat types. The richness and density of native plants were associated with the presence of invasive alien plants at various distances from the road across the three types of habitats.
Main Conclusions
The study highlights that proximity to the road, habitat type and environmental factors are critical in determining the distribution of plant species within nature reserves. Moreover, it underscores the importance of integrating both above-ground and seed bank perspectives for effective management strategies to control invasive species and promote native plant communities.
期刊介绍:
Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.