Congyi Xie, Jinzhan Chen, Shuwen Yang, Feiyang Ye, Zhenyang Lin, Yijiao Xu, Yimin Yang, Lin Tong
{"title":"Risk Factors for Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Anlotinib Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Congyi Xie, Jinzhan Chen, Shuwen Yang, Feiyang Ye, Zhenyang Lin, Yijiao Xu, Yimin Yang, Lin Tong","doi":"10.1111/crj.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Anlotinib is widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. However, there remains a lack of predictive biomarkers to effectively gauge the response to anlotinib therapy. We conducted a retrospective study to preliminarily explore potential risk factors that might predict outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing anlotinib treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib at our hospital between 1 June 2018 and 1 June 2021. Data were gathered from electronic medical records. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were described. Predictive factors related to treatment efficacy were preliminarily analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After adjusting for potential confounders, clinical stage IV (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–5.82, <i>p</i> = 0.0311), N-terminal fragment brain natriuretic peptides (NT-pro-BNP) > 300 pg/mL (HR = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.17–5.52, <i>p</i> = 0.0183), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) > 16.3 ng/mL (HR = 1.70, 95% CI, 1.03–2.81, <i>p</i> = 0.0389) were associated with shorter OS, whereas age (HR = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.94–0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.0055) was associated with a longer PFS in fully adjusted model. Kaplan–Meier analyses of cumulative risk factors (clinical stage IV, NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL, and NSE > 16.3 ng/mL) indicated that patients with a greater number of coexisting risk factors had significantly shorter OS (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical stage IV, NT-pro-BNP level, and NSE level were identified as independent prognostic factors for lung cancer patients undergoing anlotinib treatment. Patients with multiple high-risk factors may derive limited benefit from anlotinib.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk Factors for Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Anlotinib Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Purpose
Anlotinib is widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. However, there remains a lack of predictive biomarkers to effectively gauge the response to anlotinib therapy. We conducted a retrospective study to preliminarily explore potential risk factors that might predict outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing anlotinib treatment.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib at our hospital between 1 June 2018 and 1 June 2021. Data were gathered from electronic medical records. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were described. Predictive factors related to treatment efficacy were preliminarily analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses.
Results
After adjusting for potential confounders, clinical stage IV (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–5.82, p = 0.0311), N-terminal fragment brain natriuretic peptides (NT-pro-BNP) > 300 pg/mL (HR = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.17–5.52, p = 0.0183), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) > 16.3 ng/mL (HR = 1.70, 95% CI, 1.03–2.81, p = 0.0389) were associated with shorter OS, whereas age (HR = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.94–0.99, p = 0.0055) was associated with a longer PFS in fully adjusted model. Kaplan–Meier analyses of cumulative risk factors (clinical stage IV, NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/mL, and NSE > 16.3 ng/mL) indicated that patients with a greater number of coexisting risk factors had significantly shorter OS (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Clinical stage IV, NT-pro-BNP level, and NSE level were identified as independent prognostic factors for lung cancer patients undergoing anlotinib treatment. Patients with multiple high-risk factors may derive limited benefit from anlotinib.
期刊介绍:
Overview
Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format.
Aims and Scope
The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic.
We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including:
Asthma
Allergy
COPD
Non-invasive ventilation
Sleep related breathing disorders
Interstitial lung diseases
Lung cancer
Clinical genetics
Rhinitis
Airway and lung infection
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies.
Keywords
Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease,
Abstracting and Indexing Information
Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing)
Embase (Elsevier)
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell)
Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics)
MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
ProQuest Central (ProQuest)
Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics)
SCOPUS (Elsevier)