Deborah Roth, François Despontin, Philippe Compere, Marc Lamy, Dorien V. A. N. Hede, France Lambert
{"title":"氧化锆全冠跨粘膜部分清洗方法的疗效观察","authors":"Deborah Roth, François Despontin, Philippe Compere, Marc Lamy, Dorien V. A. N. Hede, France Lambert","doi":"10.1111/cid.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (<i>p</i> > 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (<i>p</i> = 0.0042).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Cleaning Methods for the Trans-Mucosal Parts of Zirconia Monolithic Crowns\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Roth, François Despontin, Philippe Compere, Marc Lamy, Dorien V. A. N. Hede, France Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (<i>p</i> > 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (<i>p</i> = 0.0042).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Cleaning Methods for the Trans-Mucosal Parts of Zirconia Monolithic Crowns
Background
Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.
Objectives
To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.
Material and Methods
Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.
Results
Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (p < 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (p = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (p > 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (p = 0.0042).
Conclusions
Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.