氧化锆全冠跨粘膜部分清洗方法的疗效观察

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Deborah Roth, François Despontin, Philippe Compere, Marc Lamy, Dorien V. A. N. Hede, France Lambert
{"title":"氧化锆全冠跨粘膜部分清洗方法的疗效观察","authors":"Deborah Roth,&nbsp;François Despontin,&nbsp;Philippe Compere,&nbsp;Marc Lamy,&nbsp;Dorien V. A. N. Hede,&nbsp;France Lambert","doi":"10.1111/cid.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (<i>p</i> = 0.0042).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Cleaning Methods for the Trans-Mucosal Parts of Zirconia Monolithic Crowns\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Roth,&nbsp;François Despontin,&nbsp;Philippe Compere,&nbsp;Marc Lamy,&nbsp;Dorien V. A. N. Hede,&nbsp;France Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (<i>p</i> = 0.0042).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙冠制造后会产生表面污染物。我们知道,在某些情况下,这些污染物可能是种植体周围炎症的来源。本研究的目的是比较两种简单、快速的牙冠清洁方法在牙科实验室的应用。目的对氧化锆全冠粘膜上釉后经黏膜部分的污染进行定性和定量分析,并比较蒸汽和超声清洗方案的效果。材料与方法将18个定制的氧化锆整体冠分为两组,每组9个冠接受不同的清洁方案。第一组用蒸汽清洗,而第二组首先用浸泡在洗涤剂中的无菌敷布摩擦,然后在含有洗涤剂、无菌水和70%乙醇的连续三次超声波浴中清洗。利用BSE-SEM和能量色散x射线能谱微分析研究了污染物的存在和性质。结果清洗前氧化锆冠表面存在有机(如油漆、汗液)和无机(如氧化锆碎片、二氧化硅、金属)。基线时,污染物占总面积的0.51%±0.26%。该百分比分别在蒸汽清洗后降至0.02%±0.03% (p < 0.0001)和超声清洗方案后降至0.02%±0.01 (p = 0.0026)。两种去污技术之间无差异(p > 0.9999),但蒸汽组的差异高于超声组(p = 0.0042)。结论:两种方案均可清洁氧化锆冠的粘膜部分,达到所研究表面的99.98%。然而,超声技术在去除残留污染物方面表现出较少的可变性,因此应该是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Cleaning Methods for the Trans-Mucosal Parts of Zirconia Monolithic Crowns

Background

Dental crowns have surface pollutants after their manufacturing. We know that these pollutants can be a source of peri-implant inflammation for some cases. This study aimed to compare two dental crowns cleaning methods that are simple and quick to apply in the dental lab.

Objectives

To characterize qualitatively and quantitatively the pollution of transmucosal parts of zirconia monolithic crowns after supra-mucosal glazing in the lab and to compare the efficacy of steam versus ultrasonic cleaning protocols.

Material and Methods

Eighteen customized zirconia monolithic crowns were divided into two groups of 9 crowns receiving a different cleaning protocol. The first group was treated with steam cleaning, whereas the second group was initially rubbed with a sterile compress soaked in a detergent and then cleaned in three successive ultrasonic baths containing a detergent, sterile water, and 70% ethanol. The presence and nature of the contaminants were investigated by BSE-SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy microanalysis.

Results

Organic (e.g., paint, sweat) and inorganic (e.g., zirconia fragments, silica, and metals) were identified on the surface of the zirconia crown before the cleaning treatments. At baseline, pollutants cover 0.51% ± 0.26% of the total area. This percentage dropped, respectively, to 0.02% ± 0.03% after steam cleaning (p < 0.0001) and to 0.02% ± 0.01 after the ultrasonic cleaning protocol (p = 0.0026). No difference was observed between the two decontamination techniques (p > 0.9999), but the variance in the steam group was higher compared to the ultrasound group (p = 0.0042).

Conclusions

Both protocols allowed the cleaning of the transmucosal parts of the zirconia crowns to an extent of 99.98% of the studied surface. However, the ultrasound technique displayed less variability in the removal of residual pollutants and therefore should be preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信