利用物理屏障评估毛细管水分对佛兰德农田表层土壤碳矿化的影响

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Astrid Françoys, Junwei Hu, Kevin Dewitte, Pascal Boeckx, Wim Cornelis, Stefaan De Neve, Steven Sleutel
{"title":"利用物理屏障评估毛细管水分对佛兰德农田表层土壤碳矿化的影响","authors":"Astrid Françoys,&nbsp;Junwei Hu,&nbsp;Kevin Dewitte,&nbsp;Pascal Boeckx,&nbsp;Wim Cornelis,&nbsp;Stefaan De Neve,&nbsp;Steven Sleutel","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To accurately predict soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under a changing climate, models must properly integrate soil hydrological controls. In Northwest Europe, prolonged droughts are expected, during which capillary moisture transport may help maintain topsoil moisture. At present, the importance of capillary moisture supply for topsoil moisture during dry summers remains uncertain, and so it is not clear if account thereof during SOC stock simulation is needed. This study aimed to determine whether a ~2-m deep groundwater table supplies moisture to topsoil during a dry summer and its effect on SOC mineralisation in six croplands across common textures (loamy sand, (sandy) loam and silt loam) in Flanders. We adopted a novel approach by installing repacked topsoil columns in situ within the plough layer, with or without a gravel layer below to act as a hydraulic barrier. In the loamy sand and (sandy) loam soils, groundwater tables of up to 2.3-m depth appeared too deep to affect topsoil through capillary moisture transport in our setup since topsoil was even slightly wetter in the gravel treatment, likely due to impeded downward water redistribution following rainfall. This artefact could be avoided with deeper barrier placement. In contrast, in the silt loam fields with groundwater tables up to 2-m depth, soil at a 15-cm depth was significantly wetter (25% volumetric water content (VWC) and a matric suction of −405 cm water height (WH)) when upward water transport was unobstructed compared to when it was blocked by the gravel barrier (18% VWC and −445 cm WH) during a 1-month drought period with very limited rainfall (5.8 mm). Surprisingly, this moisture increase via capillary rise did not enhance C mineralisation. Apparently, in these silt loam soils, C mineralization did not strongly depend on moisture, whereas in the coarser loamy sand soil, temporal moisture fluctuations had a greater impact on C mineralisation. This suggests that if capillary rise were to reach the topsoil, for instance with shallower groundwater, it could potentially influence C mineralisation. However, further research is needed to confirm this effect. Overall, whether groundwater moisture supply significantly impacted topsoil moisture and C mineralisation could only be evaluated in the silt loam croplands. Nonetheless, the proposed hydraulic barrier, with a recommended deeper installation, offers a promising tool for further testing conditions where capillary wetting may influence SOC dynamics.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of Capillary Moisture on Topsoil Carbon Mineralisation in Flemish Cropland Using a Physical Barrier\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Françoys,&nbsp;Junwei Hu,&nbsp;Kevin Dewitte,&nbsp;Pascal Boeckx,&nbsp;Wim Cornelis,&nbsp;Stefaan De Neve,&nbsp;Steven Sleutel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To accurately predict soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under a changing climate, models must properly integrate soil hydrological controls. In Northwest Europe, prolonged droughts are expected, during which capillary moisture transport may help maintain topsoil moisture. At present, the importance of capillary moisture supply for topsoil moisture during dry summers remains uncertain, and so it is not clear if account thereof during SOC stock simulation is needed. This study aimed to determine whether a ~2-m deep groundwater table supplies moisture to topsoil during a dry summer and its effect on SOC mineralisation in six croplands across common textures (loamy sand, (sandy) loam and silt loam) in Flanders. We adopted a novel approach by installing repacked topsoil columns in situ within the plough layer, with or without a gravel layer below to act as a hydraulic barrier. In the loamy sand and (sandy) loam soils, groundwater tables of up to 2.3-m depth appeared too deep to affect topsoil through capillary moisture transport in our setup since topsoil was even slightly wetter in the gravel treatment, likely due to impeded downward water redistribution following rainfall. This artefact could be avoided with deeper barrier placement. In contrast, in the silt loam fields with groundwater tables up to 2-m depth, soil at a 15-cm depth was significantly wetter (25% volumetric water content (VWC) and a matric suction of −405 cm water height (WH)) when upward water transport was unobstructed compared to when it was blocked by the gravel barrier (18% VWC and −445 cm WH) during a 1-month drought period with very limited rainfall (5.8 mm). Surprisingly, this moisture increase via capillary rise did not enhance C mineralisation. Apparently, in these silt loam soils, C mineralization did not strongly depend on moisture, whereas in the coarser loamy sand soil, temporal moisture fluctuations had a greater impact on C mineralisation. This suggests that if capillary rise were to reach the topsoil, for instance with shallower groundwater, it could potentially influence C mineralisation. However, further research is needed to confirm this effect. Overall, whether groundwater moisture supply significantly impacted topsoil moisture and C mineralisation could only be evaluated in the silt loam croplands. Nonetheless, the proposed hydraulic barrier, with a recommended deeper installation, offers a promising tool for further testing conditions where capillary wetting may influence SOC dynamics.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了准确预测气候变化下的土壤有机碳储量,模型必须适当地整合土壤水文控制。在欧洲西北部,预计将出现长期干旱,在此期间,毛细水分输送可能有助于保持表层土壤水分。目前,干旱夏季时毛细水分供给对表层土壤水分的重要性尚不确定,因此在土壤有机碳储量模拟中是否需要考虑毛细水分供给。本研究旨在确定在干燥的夏季,约2米深的地下水位是否为表土提供水分,以及它对佛兰德斯6个常见质地(壤土、(砂质)壤土和粉砂壤土)农田有机碳矿化的影响。我们采用了一种新颖的方法,在犁层内原位安装重新包装的表土柱,下面有或没有砾石层作为水力屏障。在壤土和(砂质)壤土中,2.3米深的地下水位似乎太深,无法通过毛细管水分输送影响表土,因为砾石处理的表土甚至略湿润,可能是由于降雨后向下的水分再分配受阻。这种人工制品可以通过放置更深的屏障来避免。相比之下,在地下水深度达2 m的粉砂壤土田,在1个月的干旱期(降雨量非常有限(5.8 mm)),当向上水运不受阻时,15 cm深度的土壤(25%的体积含水量(VWC)和- 405 cm水高(WH)的基质吸力)明显更湿润(18%的体积含水量和- 445 cm水高)。令人惊讶的是,这种通过毛细管上升而增加的水分并没有增强碳矿化。显然,在这些粉壤土中,碳矿化对水分的依赖性不强,而在较粗的壤土砂土中,时间水分波动对碳矿化的影响较大。这表明,如果毛细管上升到达表层土壤,例如较浅的地下水,它可能会影响碳矿化。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这种影响。总体而言,地下水水分供应是否显著影响表层土壤水分和碳矿化只能在粉壤土农田中进行评估。尽管如此,建议将液压屏障安装在更深的位置,为进一步测试毛细管润湿可能影响SOC动态的条件提供了一个有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Impact of Capillary Moisture on Topsoil Carbon Mineralisation in Flemish Cropland Using a Physical Barrier

Assessing the Impact of Capillary Moisture on Topsoil Carbon Mineralisation in Flemish Cropland Using a Physical Barrier

To accurately predict soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under a changing climate, models must properly integrate soil hydrological controls. In Northwest Europe, prolonged droughts are expected, during which capillary moisture transport may help maintain topsoil moisture. At present, the importance of capillary moisture supply for topsoil moisture during dry summers remains uncertain, and so it is not clear if account thereof during SOC stock simulation is needed. This study aimed to determine whether a ~2-m deep groundwater table supplies moisture to topsoil during a dry summer and its effect on SOC mineralisation in six croplands across common textures (loamy sand, (sandy) loam and silt loam) in Flanders. We adopted a novel approach by installing repacked topsoil columns in situ within the plough layer, with or without a gravel layer below to act as a hydraulic barrier. In the loamy sand and (sandy) loam soils, groundwater tables of up to 2.3-m depth appeared too deep to affect topsoil through capillary moisture transport in our setup since topsoil was even slightly wetter in the gravel treatment, likely due to impeded downward water redistribution following rainfall. This artefact could be avoided with deeper barrier placement. In contrast, in the silt loam fields with groundwater tables up to 2-m depth, soil at a 15-cm depth was significantly wetter (25% volumetric water content (VWC) and a matric suction of −405 cm water height (WH)) when upward water transport was unobstructed compared to when it was blocked by the gravel barrier (18% VWC and −445 cm WH) during a 1-month drought period with very limited rainfall (5.8 mm). Surprisingly, this moisture increase via capillary rise did not enhance C mineralisation. Apparently, in these silt loam soils, C mineralization did not strongly depend on moisture, whereas in the coarser loamy sand soil, temporal moisture fluctuations had a greater impact on C mineralisation. This suggests that if capillary rise were to reach the topsoil, for instance with shallower groundwater, it could potentially influence C mineralisation. However, further research is needed to confirm this effect. Overall, whether groundwater moisture supply significantly impacted topsoil moisture and C mineralisation could only be evaluated in the silt loam croplands. Nonetheless, the proposed hydraulic barrier, with a recommended deeper installation, offers a promising tool for further testing conditions where capillary wetting may influence SOC dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信