利用体面的生活标准和地球边界,为绝对环境可持续性评估制定以充足为基础的分享原则

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jonas Balsby Kromand , Joachim Peter Tilsted , Anders Bjørn
{"title":"利用体面的生活标准和地球边界,为绝对环境可持续性评估制定以充足为基础的分享原则","authors":"Jonas Balsby Kromand ,&nbsp;Joachim Peter Tilsted ,&nbsp;Anders Bjørn","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Absolute environmental sustainability assessments quantify the environmental impacts of human activities in relation to ecological carrying capacities. Such assessments necessitate the application of sharing principles to allocate shares of carrying capacity to actors and activities at different scales, including products, companies, sectors, and countries. This can help decision-makers set targets and take actions accordingly. Although a range of approaches exist, sharing principles that prioritize human needs fulfillment for all people are not properly developed. To address this gap, we develop sufficiency-based sharing principles. We do so by quantifying the life cycle impacts of satisfying decent living standards for the population of a high-income country in 2050 (Denmark) and comparing these impacts to planetary boundaries to identify a possible ‘sufficiency consumption space’. From this exercise, we infer two sharing principles. The first sharing principle assigns the allowed environmental impacts to all decent living standard consumption categories across 16 life cycle impact categories. The second sharing principle uses the degree of luxury of all goods and services in the economy, operationalized by expenditure elasticities, as a principle to share the sufficiency consumption space at a product-level. Together, these two sharing principles form a coherent suggestion for how to share a country's safe operating space, split between decent living consumption and remaining consumption. Our study thereby represents the first systematic and quantitative attempt at allocating a country's safe operating space according to human needs fulfillment and prioritizing a sufficiency consumption space according to the degree of luxury. Future research can address limitations of our study by, for example, using more granular life cycle inventory data and household expenditure data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 516-529"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Balsby Kromand ,&nbsp;Joachim Peter Tilsted ,&nbsp;Anders Bjørn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Absolute environmental sustainability assessments quantify the environmental impacts of human activities in relation to ecological carrying capacities. Such assessments necessitate the application of sharing principles to allocate shares of carrying capacity to actors and activities at different scales, including products, companies, sectors, and countries. This can help decision-makers set targets and take actions accordingly. Although a range of approaches exist, sharing principles that prioritize human needs fulfillment for all people are not properly developed. To address this gap, we develop sufficiency-based sharing principles. We do so by quantifying the life cycle impacts of satisfying decent living standards for the population of a high-income country in 2050 (Denmark) and comparing these impacts to planetary boundaries to identify a possible ‘sufficiency consumption space’. From this exercise, we infer two sharing principles. The first sharing principle assigns the allowed environmental impacts to all decent living standard consumption categories across 16 life cycle impact categories. The second sharing principle uses the degree of luxury of all goods and services in the economy, operationalized by expenditure elasticities, as a principle to share the sufficiency consumption space at a product-level. Together, these two sharing principles form a coherent suggestion for how to share a country's safe operating space, split between decent living consumption and remaining consumption. Our study thereby represents the first systematic and quantitative attempt at allocating a country's safe operating space according to human needs fulfillment and prioritizing a sufficiency consumption space according to the degree of luxury. Future research can address limitations of our study by, for example, using more granular life cycle inventory data and household expenditure data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 516-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000089\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绝对环境可持续性评估将人类活动对环境的影响与生态承载能力进行量化。这种评估需要采用分担原则,将承载量分配给不同规模的行为者和活动,包括产品、公司、部门和国家。这可以帮助决策者设定目标并采取相应的行动。虽然存在一系列的方法,但优先满足所有人的人类需求的共享原则并没有得到适当的发展。为了解决这一差距,我们制定了基于充足的共享原则。为此,我们量化了2050年满足一个高收入国家(丹麦)人口体面生活水平的生命周期影响,并将这些影响与地球边界进行比较,以确定可能的“充足消费空间”。从这个练习中,我们推断出两个共享原则。第一个共享原则将允许的环境影响分配给16个生命周期影响类别中的所有体面生活标准消费类别。第二个共享原则使用经济中所有商品和服务的奢侈程度,通过支出弹性来运作,作为在产品层面共享充足消费空间的原则。这两项共享原则共同构成了一个连贯的建议,即如何共享一个国家的安全运营空间,在体面的生活消费和剩余消费之间进行划分。因此,我们的研究代表了第一次系统和定量的尝试,即根据人类需求的满足来分配一个国家的安全操作空间,并根据奢侈程度优先分配充足的消费空间。未来的研究可以解决我们研究的局限性,例如,使用更细粒度的生命周期库存数据和家庭支出数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries

Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries
Absolute environmental sustainability assessments quantify the environmental impacts of human activities in relation to ecological carrying capacities. Such assessments necessitate the application of sharing principles to allocate shares of carrying capacity to actors and activities at different scales, including products, companies, sectors, and countries. This can help decision-makers set targets and take actions accordingly. Although a range of approaches exist, sharing principles that prioritize human needs fulfillment for all people are not properly developed. To address this gap, we develop sufficiency-based sharing principles. We do so by quantifying the life cycle impacts of satisfying decent living standards for the population of a high-income country in 2050 (Denmark) and comparing these impacts to planetary boundaries to identify a possible ‘sufficiency consumption space’. From this exercise, we infer two sharing principles. The first sharing principle assigns the allowed environmental impacts to all decent living standard consumption categories across 16 life cycle impact categories. The second sharing principle uses the degree of luxury of all goods and services in the economy, operationalized by expenditure elasticities, as a principle to share the sufficiency consumption space at a product-level. Together, these two sharing principles form a coherent suggestion for how to share a country's safe operating space, split between decent living consumption and remaining consumption. Our study thereby represents the first systematic and quantitative attempt at allocating a country's safe operating space according to human needs fulfillment and prioritizing a sufficiency consumption space according to the degree of luxury. Future research can address limitations of our study by, for example, using more granular life cycle inventory data and household expenditure data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信