Xiaoxi Cheng , Yuanping Cheng , Chenghao Wang , Jia Wang , Biao Hu
{"title":"甲烷作为表征煤层气储层孔隙体积的探针:扩孔分析方法","authors":"Xiaoxi Cheng , Yuanping Cheng , Chenghao Wang , Jia Wang , Biao Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Molecular probes are indispensable tools for structure analysis of porous media. Notably, methane, the primary component of coalbed gas, provides a more direct insight into coal pore properties compared to traditional molecular probes like nitrogen and carbon dioxide. This study develops a methodology for determining the pore volume of coal, utilizing methane as a probe. Two Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR) adsorption model-based methods, the virtual saturated vapor pressure modified method (DR-P<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the adsorbed phase density modified method (DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span>), were discussed. To select a superior precision method for pore volume determination, we proposed an evaluation method that leverages molecular simulation, comparing direct-model pore volumes with fitted-calculated pore volumes obtained by fitting the DR modified models to simulated adsorption isotherms. The results demonstrate that the DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span> methods exhibit high precision, with a discrepancy rate of only 2.45%. Compared with the pore volumes of traditional molecular probes with well-defined pore measurement ranges such as CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and N<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, it was confirmed that the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span> methods are mainly aimed at micropores. Moreover, the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe performs better than the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe in reflecting adsorption characteristics. By conducting a correlation analysis between the pore volume data obtained from CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probes on 20 coal samples and the methane adsorption amount at 5 MPa, we found that the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe is significantly higher than that for CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, which was more than 0.99. This study reveals the potential of methane probes in pore characterization and expands pore analysis methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"389 ","pages":"Article 134563"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methane as probes for characterizing pore volume in coalbed gas reservoir: Expanding the pore analysis method\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxi Cheng , Yuanping Cheng , Chenghao Wang , Jia Wang , Biao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Molecular probes are indispensable tools for structure analysis of porous media. Notably, methane, the primary component of coalbed gas, provides a more direct insight into coal pore properties compared to traditional molecular probes like nitrogen and carbon dioxide. This study develops a methodology for determining the pore volume of coal, utilizing methane as a probe. Two Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR) adsorption model-based methods, the virtual saturated vapor pressure modified method (DR-P<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the adsorbed phase density modified method (DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span>), were discussed. To select a superior precision method for pore volume determination, we proposed an evaluation method that leverages molecular simulation, comparing direct-model pore volumes with fitted-calculated pore volumes obtained by fitting the DR modified models to simulated adsorption isotherms. The results demonstrate that the DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span> methods exhibit high precision, with a discrepancy rate of only 2.45%. Compared with the pore volumes of traditional molecular probes with well-defined pore measurement ranges such as CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and N<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, it was confirmed that the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-DR-<span><math><mi>ρ</mi></math></span> methods are mainly aimed at micropores. Moreover, the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe performs better than the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe in reflecting adsorption characteristics. By conducting a correlation analysis between the pore volume data obtained from CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probes on 20 coal samples and the methane adsorption amount at 5 MPa, we found that the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> probe is significantly higher than that for CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, which was more than 0.99. This study reveals the potential of methane probes in pore characterization and expands pore analysis methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuel\",\"volume\":\"389 \",\"pages\":\"Article 134563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001623612500287X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001623612500287X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methane as probes for characterizing pore volume in coalbed gas reservoir: Expanding the pore analysis method
Molecular probes are indispensable tools for structure analysis of porous media. Notably, methane, the primary component of coalbed gas, provides a more direct insight into coal pore properties compared to traditional molecular probes like nitrogen and carbon dioxide. This study develops a methodology for determining the pore volume of coal, utilizing methane as a probe. Two Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR) adsorption model-based methods, the virtual saturated vapor pressure modified method (DR-P) and the adsorbed phase density modified method (DR-), were discussed. To select a superior precision method for pore volume determination, we proposed an evaluation method that leverages molecular simulation, comparing direct-model pore volumes with fitted-calculated pore volumes obtained by fitting the DR modified models to simulated adsorption isotherms. The results demonstrate that the DR- methods exhibit high precision, with a discrepancy rate of only 2.45%. Compared with the pore volumes of traditional molecular probes with well-defined pore measurement ranges such as CO and N, it was confirmed that the CH-DR- methods are mainly aimed at micropores. Moreover, the CH probe performs better than the CO probe in reflecting adsorption characteristics. By conducting a correlation analysis between the pore volume data obtained from CH and CO probes on 20 coal samples and the methane adsorption amount at 5 MPa, we found that the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CH probe is significantly higher than that for CO, which was more than 0.99. This study reveals the potential of methane probes in pore characterization and expands pore analysis methods.
期刊介绍:
The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.