用瓦里安TrueBeam直线加速器对电子束治疗外周剂量的综合分析

Q1 Health Professions
Kapil Dev Maharaj , Mahsheed Sabet , Joshua Dass , Mounir Ibrahim , Talat Mahmood , Pejman Rowshanfarzad
{"title":"用瓦里安TrueBeam直线加速器对电子束治疗外周剂量的综合分析","authors":"Kapil Dev Maharaj ,&nbsp;Mahsheed Sabet ,&nbsp;Joshua Dass ,&nbsp;Mounir Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Talat Mahmood ,&nbsp;Pejman Rowshanfarzad","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the characteristics of peripheral doses outside electron-beam applicators in Varian TrueBeam linacs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Peripheral doses outside the electron applicator were measured for 6-, 9- and 12-MeV beams at the maximum dose depth (<em>D</em><sub>max</sub>) for each energy source and at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm. Measurements were performed using EBT3 films in solid water phantoms. The impact of field size on the penumbra width and peripheral doses was studied using various cutouts, including 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm, 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, and 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator with the gantry and collimator at 0°. The influence of the applicator size was investigated using a circular cutout of 5 ​cm in diameter for various applicator sizes, including 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm, 15 ​cm ​× ​15 ​cm, 20 cm ​× ​20 ​cm, and 25 ​cm ​× ​25 ​cm, at <em>D</em><sub>max</sub> for each energy, while keeping the gantry and collimator angle at 0°. The measured dose profiles were compared with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) predicted dose profiles. The effect of varying gantry angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm cutout in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator for each energy source and varying collimator angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm field were investigated to determine their effects on the penumbra widths and peripheral doses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both the penumbra width and peripheral dose values increased with energy across different field sizes, gantry angles, collimator angles, and applicator sizes. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) analysis indicated minimal differences between the measured profiles and TPS data. Peripheral doses remained below 5% of the maximum dose approximately 10–15 ​mm away from the field edges, suggesting the potential for implementing additional shielding where required.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the importance of considering peripheral doses in electron radiotherapy. It is important to note the impact on healthy tissues beyond the treatment area to ensure patient safety and prevent the long-term side effects of treatment. These findings emphasize the necessity of implementing appropriate measures to minimize peripheral doses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive analysis of peripheral dose in electron beam therapy with a Varian TrueBeam Linac\",\"authors\":\"Kapil Dev Maharaj ,&nbsp;Mahsheed Sabet ,&nbsp;Joshua Dass ,&nbsp;Mounir Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Talat Mahmood ,&nbsp;Pejman Rowshanfarzad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmp.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the characteristics of peripheral doses outside electron-beam applicators in Varian TrueBeam linacs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Peripheral doses outside the electron applicator were measured for 6-, 9- and 12-MeV beams at the maximum dose depth (<em>D</em><sub>max</sub>) for each energy source and at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm. Measurements were performed using EBT3 films in solid water phantoms. The impact of field size on the penumbra width and peripheral doses was studied using various cutouts, including 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm, 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, and 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator with the gantry and collimator at 0°. The influence of the applicator size was investigated using a circular cutout of 5 ​cm in diameter for various applicator sizes, including 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm, 15 ​cm ​× ​15 ​cm, 20 cm ​× ​20 ​cm, and 25 ​cm ​× ​25 ​cm, at <em>D</em><sub>max</sub> for each energy, while keeping the gantry and collimator angle at 0°. The measured dose profiles were compared with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) predicted dose profiles. The effect of varying gantry angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm cutout in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator for each energy source and varying collimator angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm field were investigated to determine their effects on the penumbra widths and peripheral doses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both the penumbra width and peripheral dose values increased with energy across different field sizes, gantry angles, collimator angles, and applicator sizes. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) analysis indicated minimal differences between the measured profiles and TPS data. Peripheral doses remained below 5% of the maximum dose approximately 10–15 ​mm away from the field edges, suggesting the potential for implementing additional shielding where required.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the importance of considering peripheral doses in electron radiotherapy. It is important to note the impact on healthy tissues beyond the treatment area to ensure patient safety and prevent the long-term side effects of treatment. These findings emphasize the necessity of implementing appropriate measures to minimize peripheral doses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 28-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555724000844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555724000844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨瓦里安TrueBeam直线加速器电子束外周剂量的特点。方法在每个能量源的最大剂量深度(Dmax)和源-表面距离(SSD)为100 cm时,测量6、9和12 mev束流在电子施加器外的外周剂量。使用EBT3薄膜在固体水模型中进行测量。在10 cm × 10 cm施药器中,使用不同的切口,包括3 cm × 3 cm、6 cm × 6 cm和10 cm × 10 cm,研究了视场尺寸对半影宽度和外围剂量的影响。使用直径为5 cm的圆形切口,研究了不同尺寸的涂药器(包括6 cm × 6 cm、10 cm × 10 cm、15 cm × 15 cm、20 cm × 20 cm和25 cm × 25 cm)在每种能量的Dmax下对涂药器尺寸的影响,同时保持机架和准直器角度为0°。测量剂量谱与Eclipse治疗计划系统(TPS)预测剂量谱进行比较。研究了不同的门架角度(0°,90°和270°)对每个能量源在10 cm × 10 cm应用器中3cm × 3cm切口的影响,以及不同的准直角度(0°,90°和270°)对10 cm × 10 cm场的影响,以确定它们对半影宽度和外围剂量的影响。结果在不同视场尺寸、门架角度、准直器角度和施药器尺寸下,半影宽度和周边剂量值均随能量的增加而增加。均方根偏差(RMSD)分析表明,测量剖面与TPS数据之间的差异极小。外围剂量保持在最大剂量的5%以下,距离场边约10-15毫米,表明有可能在需要时实施额外的屏蔽。结论本研究强调了在电子放射治疗中考虑外周剂量的重要性。重要的是要注意对治疗区域以外的健康组织的影响,以确保患者安全并防止治疗的长期副作用。这些发现强调了采取适当措施尽量减少周边剂量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive analysis of peripheral dose in electron beam therapy with a Varian TrueBeam Linac

Objective

To investigate the characteristics of peripheral doses outside electron-beam applicators in Varian TrueBeam linacs.

Method

Peripheral doses outside the electron applicator were measured for 6-, 9- and 12-MeV beams at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) for each energy source and at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm. Measurements were performed using EBT3 films in solid water phantoms. The impact of field size on the penumbra width and peripheral doses was studied using various cutouts, including 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm, 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, and 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator with the gantry and collimator at 0°. The influence of the applicator size was investigated using a circular cutout of 5 ​cm in diameter for various applicator sizes, including 6 ​cm ​× ​6 ​cm, 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm, 15 ​cm ​× ​15 ​cm, 20 cm ​× ​20 ​cm, and 25 ​cm ​× ​25 ​cm, at Dmax for each energy, while keeping the gantry and collimator angle at 0°. The measured dose profiles were compared with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) predicted dose profiles. The effect of varying gantry angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 3 ​cm ​× ​3 ​cm cutout in a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm applicator for each energy source and varying collimator angles (0°, 90°, and 270°) for a 10 ​cm ​× ​10 ​cm field were investigated to determine their effects on the penumbra widths and peripheral doses.

Results

Both the penumbra width and peripheral dose values increased with energy across different field sizes, gantry angles, collimator angles, and applicator sizes. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) analysis indicated minimal differences between the measured profiles and TPS data. Peripheral doses remained below 5% of the maximum dose approximately 10–15 ​mm away from the field edges, suggesting the potential for implementing additional shielding where required.

Conclusions

This study highlights the importance of considering peripheral doses in electron radiotherapy. It is important to note the impact on healthy tissues beyond the treatment area to ensure patient safety and prevent the long-term side effects of treatment. These findings emphasize the necessity of implementing appropriate measures to minimize peripheral doses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信