全国城市乔灌木气候适应能力试验网络

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez , Sally A. Power , Mark G. Tjoelker , Mahmuda Sharmin , Paul D. Rymer
{"title":"全国城市乔灌木气候适应能力试验网络","authors":"Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Sally A. Power ,&nbsp;Mark G. Tjoelker ,&nbsp;Mahmuda Sharmin ,&nbsp;Paul D. Rymer","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban forests are widely recognised as a nature-based solution to mitigate the effects of climate change; however, urban forests are also vulnerable to climate change. Therefore, there is a need to improve species selection to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services by urban forests now and in the future. Research on the impacts of climate change on urban forests requires investigation to capture the complexities associated with species identity and growing conditions. Yet, such studies remain rare in urban contexts, highlighting the need for expanding collaborative research in cities. Here, we present a nation-wide urban trial network established across four states in Australia, showcasing stakeholder collaboration aimed at advancing urban forest research. The network consists of 11 standardised plantings of tree and/or shrub species aimed at testing species’ growth and performance (i.e., stress tolerance) in cities across a range of climatic conditions. To test these differences, we measured height and diameter relative growth rates (RGR) and leaf damage caused by stress at each site one month after planting (2018–2020) and at the end of the austral summer in 2024. We used generalised linear mixed-effects models for RGR and ordinal logistic regressions for leaf damage to test the effects of annual maximum temperature (T<sub>MAX</sub>) and the Pinna Combinative Index (<em>I</em><sub>P</sub>, a climate-drought index). By 2024, across all sites, we found 23 % of the originally planted individuals had died or were missing. We recorded significant differences in height and diameter RGR and leaf damage among sites, and <em>I</em><sub>P</sub> was significantly and negatively related to both RGR and leaf damage. The network serves as an example of how stakeholder collaboration can broaden the scope of urban forest research that evaluates plant growth and performance across regions and environmental conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 128720"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nation-wide urban trial network of tree and shrub climate resilience\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Sally A. Power ,&nbsp;Mark G. Tjoelker ,&nbsp;Mahmuda Sharmin ,&nbsp;Paul D. Rymer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban forests are widely recognised as a nature-based solution to mitigate the effects of climate change; however, urban forests are also vulnerable to climate change. Therefore, there is a need to improve species selection to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services by urban forests now and in the future. Research on the impacts of climate change on urban forests requires investigation to capture the complexities associated with species identity and growing conditions. Yet, such studies remain rare in urban contexts, highlighting the need for expanding collaborative research in cities. Here, we present a nation-wide urban trial network established across four states in Australia, showcasing stakeholder collaboration aimed at advancing urban forest research. The network consists of 11 standardised plantings of tree and/or shrub species aimed at testing species’ growth and performance (i.e., stress tolerance) in cities across a range of climatic conditions. To test these differences, we measured height and diameter relative growth rates (RGR) and leaf damage caused by stress at each site one month after planting (2018–2020) and at the end of the austral summer in 2024. We used generalised linear mixed-effects models for RGR and ordinal logistic regressions for leaf damage to test the effects of annual maximum temperature (T<sub>MAX</sub>) and the Pinna Combinative Index (<em>I</em><sub>P</sub>, a climate-drought index). By 2024, across all sites, we found 23 % of the originally planted individuals had died or were missing. We recorded significant differences in height and diameter RGR and leaf damage among sites, and <em>I</em><sub>P</sub> was significantly and negatively related to both RGR and leaf damage. The network serves as an example of how stakeholder collaboration can broaden the scope of urban forest research that evaluates plant growth and performance across regions and environmental conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市森林被广泛认为是缓解气候变化影响的一种基于自然的解决方案;然而,城市森林也容易受到气候变化的影响。因此,有必要改进物种选择,以确保现在和将来城市森林提供生态系统服务。研究气候变化对城市森林的影响需要进行调查,以捕捉与物种特征和生长条件相关的复杂性。然而,这样的研究在城市背景下仍然很少,突出了扩大城市合作研究的必要性。在这里,我们展示了在澳大利亚四个州建立的全国范围的城市试验网络,展示了旨在推进城市森林研究的利益相关者合作。该网络包括11种树木和/或灌木的标准化种植,旨在测试城市中各种气候条件下物种的生长和表现(即耐受性)。为了验证这些差异,我们测量了种植后一个月(2018-2020年)和2024年南方夏季结束时每个地点的高度和直径相对生长率(RGR)和叶片因胁迫造成的损害。我们使用广义线性混合效应模型(RGR)和有序logistic回归模型(叶片损伤)来测试年最高温度(TMAX)和Pinna组合指数(IP,一种气候干旱指数)的影响。到2024年,在所有的地点,我们发现23% 原来种植的个体已经死亡或失踪。研究结果表明,不同立地的高、径RGR和叶片损伤均存在显著差异,而IP与RGR和叶片损伤均呈显著负相关。该网络是利益相关者合作如何扩大城市森林研究范围的一个范例,该研究可评估不同区域和环境条件下的植物生长和表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A nation-wide urban trial network of tree and shrub climate resilience
Urban forests are widely recognised as a nature-based solution to mitigate the effects of climate change; however, urban forests are also vulnerable to climate change. Therefore, there is a need to improve species selection to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services by urban forests now and in the future. Research on the impacts of climate change on urban forests requires investigation to capture the complexities associated with species identity and growing conditions. Yet, such studies remain rare in urban contexts, highlighting the need for expanding collaborative research in cities. Here, we present a nation-wide urban trial network established across four states in Australia, showcasing stakeholder collaboration aimed at advancing urban forest research. The network consists of 11 standardised plantings of tree and/or shrub species aimed at testing species’ growth and performance (i.e., stress tolerance) in cities across a range of climatic conditions. To test these differences, we measured height and diameter relative growth rates (RGR) and leaf damage caused by stress at each site one month after planting (2018–2020) and at the end of the austral summer in 2024. We used generalised linear mixed-effects models for RGR and ordinal logistic regressions for leaf damage to test the effects of annual maximum temperature (TMAX) and the Pinna Combinative Index (IP, a climate-drought index). By 2024, across all sites, we found 23 % of the originally planted individuals had died or were missing. We recorded significant differences in height and diameter RGR and leaf damage among sites, and IP was significantly and negatively related to both RGR and leaf damage. The network serves as an example of how stakeholder collaboration can broaden the scope of urban forest research that evaluates plant growth and performance across regions and environmental conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信