全球航空的战略气候政策:双寡头飞机生产商的航空燃油税和效率标准

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS
Marten Ovaere , Stef Proost
{"title":"全球航空的战略气候政策:双寡头飞机生产商的航空燃油税和效率标准","authors":"Marten Ovaere ,&nbsp;Stef Proost","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2025.100397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We develop a three-stage game with three governments, a EU-US aircraft production duopoly, and competitive airlines. The model determines the optimal combination of fossil fuel taxes and fuel efficiency standards to decarbonize the aviation sector with imperfect competition and technological spillovers, under various government cooperation levels. We find that without international cooperation, technology spillovers prevent large efficiency investments. Fuel taxes are low but exceed domestic climate damages in regions without aircraft production. Regions with domestic aircraft producers subsidize aviation when the social cost of carbon is low. Second, EU-US cooperation increases fuel efficiency, but fuel taxes are lower than without cooperation, such that carbon emission reductions are limited both with and without cooperation. Third, global cooperation yields the largest efficiency gains, but fuel taxes remain below the world climate damage. Finally, achieving net-zero emissions requires a combination of fuel efficiency, demand reduction through higher fuel taxes, and new aviation fuels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic climate policy in global aviation: Aviation fuel taxes and efficiency standards with duopolistic aircraft producers\",\"authors\":\"Marten Ovaere ,&nbsp;Stef Proost\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecotra.2025.100397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We develop a three-stage game with three governments, a EU-US aircraft production duopoly, and competitive airlines. The model determines the optimal combination of fossil fuel taxes and fuel efficiency standards to decarbonize the aviation sector with imperfect competition and technological spillovers, under various government cooperation levels. We find that without international cooperation, technology spillovers prevent large efficiency investments. Fuel taxes are low but exceed domestic climate damages in regions without aircraft production. Regions with domestic aircraft producers subsidize aviation when the social cost of carbon is low. Second, EU-US cooperation increases fuel efficiency, but fuel taxes are lower than without cooperation, such that carbon emission reductions are limited both with and without cooperation. Third, global cooperation yields the largest efficiency gains, but fuel taxes remain below the world climate damage. Finally, achieving net-zero emissions requires a combination of fuel efficiency, demand reduction through higher fuel taxes, and new aviation fuels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221201222500005X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221201222500005X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们与三个政府、欧盟和美国飞机生产双头垄断以及竞争激烈的航空公司建立了一个三阶段博弈。该模型确定了在不同政府合作水平下,在不完全竞争和技术溢出的情况下,化石燃料税和燃油效率标准的最优组合,以实现航空业的脱碳。我们发现,如果没有国际合作,技术溢出将阻碍大规模效率投资。在没有飞机生产的地区,燃油税很低,但超过了国内气候损失。当碳排放的社会成本较低时,拥有国内飞机生产商的地区会对航空业进行补贴。其次,欧盟与美国的合作提高了燃油效率,但燃油税比没有合作时要低,因此无论有无合作,碳减排都是有限的。第三,全球合作带来了最大的效率收益,但燃油税仍低于全球气候损害。最后,实现净零排放需要燃油效率、通过提高燃油税来减少需求和新型航空燃料的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic climate policy in global aviation: Aviation fuel taxes and efficiency standards with duopolistic aircraft producers
We develop a three-stage game with three governments, a EU-US aircraft production duopoly, and competitive airlines. The model determines the optimal combination of fossil fuel taxes and fuel efficiency standards to decarbonize the aviation sector with imperfect competition and technological spillovers, under various government cooperation levels. We find that without international cooperation, technology spillovers prevent large efficiency investments. Fuel taxes are low but exceed domestic climate damages in regions without aircraft production. Regions with domestic aircraft producers subsidize aviation when the social cost of carbon is low. Second, EU-US cooperation increases fuel efficiency, but fuel taxes are lower than without cooperation, such that carbon emission reductions are limited both with and without cooperation. Third, global cooperation yields the largest efficiency gains, but fuel taxes remain below the world climate damage. Finally, achieving net-zero emissions requires a combination of fuel efficiency, demand reduction through higher fuel taxes, and new aviation fuels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信