Shan Xue, Guangyu Guo, Jianan Gao, Yihan Zhang, Taha Marhaba and Wen Zhang*,
{"title":"优化陶瓷膜的纳米气泡生成:孔径、表面疏水性和流动条件对气泡特性和氧化的影响","authors":"Shan Xue, Guangyu Guo, Jianan Gao, Yihan Zhang, Taha Marhaba and Wen Zhang*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0478110.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Precise control of nanobubble size is essential for optimizing the efficiency and performance of nanobubble applications across diverse fields, such as agriculture, water treatment, and medicine. Producing fine bubbles, including nanobubbles, is commonly achieved by purging gas through porous media, such as ceramic or polymer membranes. Many operational factors and membrane properties can significantly influence nanobubble production and characteristics. This study examines how membrane pore size, surface hydrophobicity, and gas/water flow conditions affect nanobubble size and concentration. Findings reveal that reducing the ceramic membrane pore size from 200 to 10 nm slightly decreased the mean nanobubble diameter from 115 to 89 nm. Furthermore, membranes with a hydrophilic outer surface and hydrophobic pore surface generated smaller nanobubbles with higher concentrations in water. Additionally, a high water cross-flow rate (e.g., >1 L·min<sup>–1</sup>) increased the nanobubble concentration, though bubble size remained unaffected. In contrast, the gas flow rate had a more pronounced effect. Increasing the gas flow rate from 0.5 to 12 L·min<sup>–1</sup> significantly raised the nanobubble concentration from 3.09 × 10<sup>8</sup> to 1.24 × 10<sup>9</sup> bubbles·mL<sup>–1</sup> while reducing the mean bubble diameter from 100 to 79 nm. An interfacial force model was applied to analyze bubble detachment at the membrane pore outlet, considering factors such as gas flow/pressure, surface tension, and shear forces from the water flow. These findings offer valuable insights into the mechanisms governing nanobubble generation via gas injection through porous membranes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50,"journal":{"name":"Langmuir","volume":"41 5","pages":"3592–3602 3592–3602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Nanobubble Production in Ceramic Membranes: Effects of Pore Size, Surface Hydrophobicity, and Flow Conditions on Bubble Characteristics and Oxygenation\",\"authors\":\"Shan Xue, Guangyu Guo, Jianan Gao, Yihan Zhang, Taha Marhaba and Wen Zhang*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0478110.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Precise control of nanobubble size is essential for optimizing the efficiency and performance of nanobubble applications across diverse fields, such as agriculture, water treatment, and medicine. Producing fine bubbles, including nanobubbles, is commonly achieved by purging gas through porous media, such as ceramic or polymer membranes. Many operational factors and membrane properties can significantly influence nanobubble production and characteristics. This study examines how membrane pore size, surface hydrophobicity, and gas/water flow conditions affect nanobubble size and concentration. Findings reveal that reducing the ceramic membrane pore size from 200 to 10 nm slightly decreased the mean nanobubble diameter from 115 to 89 nm. Furthermore, membranes with a hydrophilic outer surface and hydrophobic pore surface generated smaller nanobubbles with higher concentrations in water. Additionally, a high water cross-flow rate (e.g., >1 L·min<sup>–1</sup>) increased the nanobubble concentration, though bubble size remained unaffected. In contrast, the gas flow rate had a more pronounced effect. Increasing the gas flow rate from 0.5 to 12 L·min<sup>–1</sup> significantly raised the nanobubble concentration from 3.09 × 10<sup>8</sup> to 1.24 × 10<sup>9</sup> bubbles·mL<sup>–1</sup> while reducing the mean bubble diameter from 100 to 79 nm. An interfacial force model was applied to analyze bubble detachment at the membrane pore outlet, considering factors such as gas flow/pressure, surface tension, and shear forces from the water flow. These findings offer valuable insights into the mechanisms governing nanobubble generation via gas injection through porous membranes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langmuir\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"3592–3602 3592–3602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langmuir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langmuir","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Nanobubble Production in Ceramic Membranes: Effects of Pore Size, Surface Hydrophobicity, and Flow Conditions on Bubble Characteristics and Oxygenation
Precise control of nanobubble size is essential for optimizing the efficiency and performance of nanobubble applications across diverse fields, such as agriculture, water treatment, and medicine. Producing fine bubbles, including nanobubbles, is commonly achieved by purging gas through porous media, such as ceramic or polymer membranes. Many operational factors and membrane properties can significantly influence nanobubble production and characteristics. This study examines how membrane pore size, surface hydrophobicity, and gas/water flow conditions affect nanobubble size and concentration. Findings reveal that reducing the ceramic membrane pore size from 200 to 10 nm slightly decreased the mean nanobubble diameter from 115 to 89 nm. Furthermore, membranes with a hydrophilic outer surface and hydrophobic pore surface generated smaller nanobubbles with higher concentrations in water. Additionally, a high water cross-flow rate (e.g., >1 L·min–1) increased the nanobubble concentration, though bubble size remained unaffected. In contrast, the gas flow rate had a more pronounced effect. Increasing the gas flow rate from 0.5 to 12 L·min–1 significantly raised the nanobubble concentration from 3.09 × 108 to 1.24 × 109 bubbles·mL–1 while reducing the mean bubble diameter from 100 to 79 nm. An interfacial force model was applied to analyze bubble detachment at the membrane pore outlet, considering factors such as gas flow/pressure, surface tension, and shear forces from the water flow. These findings offer valuable insights into the mechanisms governing nanobubble generation via gas injection through porous membranes.
期刊介绍:
Langmuir is an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles in the following subject categories:
Colloids: surfactants and self-assembly, dispersions, emulsions, foams
Interfaces: adsorption, reactions, films, forces
Biological Interfaces: biocolloids, biomolecular and biomimetic materials
Materials: nano- and mesostructured materials, polymers, gels, liquid crystals
Electrochemistry: interfacial charge transfer, charge transport, electrocatalysis, electrokinetic phenomena, bioelectrochemistry
Devices and Applications: sensors, fluidics, patterning, catalysis, photonic crystals
However, when high-impact, original work is submitted that does not fit within the above categories, decisions to accept or decline such papers will be based on one criteria: What Would Irving Do?
Langmuir ranks #2 in citations out of 136 journals in the category of Physical Chemistry with 113,157 total citations. The journal received an Impact Factor of 4.384*.
This journal is also indexed in the categories of Materials Science (ranked #1) and Multidisciplinary Chemistry (ranked #5).