缓解全视网膜光凝疼痛的药物治疗:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mateus Pimenta Arruda , Sara Hira , Rian Vilar Lima , Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa , Mariana Tosato Zinher , Lubna Al-Sharif , João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira , Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle
{"title":"缓解全视网膜光凝疼痛的药物治疗:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Mateus Pimenta Arruda ,&nbsp;Sara Hira ,&nbsp;Rian Vilar Lima ,&nbsp;Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa ,&nbsp;Mariana Tosato Zinher ,&nbsp;Lubna Al-Sharif ,&nbsp;João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira ,&nbsp;Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD −2.4 (95 % CrI −4.7 to −0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 645-652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological therapy for relieving pain in panretinal photocoagulation: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Mateus Pimenta Arruda ,&nbsp;Sara Hira ,&nbsp;Rian Vilar Lima ,&nbsp;Larissa Irigoyen Teixeira Barbosa ,&nbsp;Mariana Tosato Zinher ,&nbsp;Lubna Al-Sharif ,&nbsp;João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira ,&nbsp;Giulia Steuernagel Del Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD −2.4 (95 % CrI −4.7 to −0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 645-652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000220\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)可以帮助比较用于减轻全视网膜光凝疼痛的各种镇痛药和麻醉药。我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以评估药物干预对缓解全视网膜光凝(PRP)患者疼痛的作用。我们纳入15项随机对照试验和4项交叉试验,共1787只眼,45.83%的参与者为女性。参与者的平均年龄为55岁。与安慰剂相比,2%的球周利多卡因是唯一显著的治疗方法(MD -2.4 (95% CrI -4.7 -0.20))。秩概率和SUCRA也显示2%球周利多卡因(0.887)是降低疼痛评分的最佳治疗方案,其次是依托昔布(0.809)和双氯芬酸钾(0.727)。与全身和局部用药相比,2%的球周利多卡因可有效减少激光治疗中的程序性疼痛。未来的研究应该评估能够到达并作用于眼后段的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacological therapy for relieving pain in panretinal photocoagulation: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of analgesics and anesthetics used for lowering pain of panretinal photocoagulation. We carried out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess pharmacological interventions for relieving pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). We included 15 randomized controlled trials and 4 crossover trials with a total of 1787 eyes and 45.83 % of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 55 years. 2 % peribulbar lidocaine was the only significant treatment compared to placebo (MD −2.4 (95 % CrI −4.7 to −0.20). The rank probability and SUCRA also revealed 2 % peribulbar lidocaine (0.887) as the best treatment in terms of lowering the pain scores followed by etoricoxib (0.809) and potassium diclofenac (0.727). Two per cent peribulbar lidocaine is effective for reducing procedural pain in laser treatment compared to systemic and topical medications. Future studies should evaluate drugs that can reach and act on the posterior segment of the eye.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信