Ke-Wen Wan, Zi-Han Dai, Po-San Wong, Robin Sze-Tak Ho, Bjorn T Tam
{"title":"比较综合神经肌肉训练和传统体能训练对年轻运动员体能表现的影响：系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ke-Wen Wan, Zi-Han Dai, Po-San Wong, Robin Sze-Tak Ho, Bjorn T Tam","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00811-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing youth's physical fitness levels during childhood and adolescence through prior training programs can significantly optimize their athletic performance. The integrative neuromuscular training (INT) model is designed to improve neuromuscular function and prevent athletic injuries, and is superior to the traditional physical training method. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of INT versus traditional physical fitness training (PT) on physical performance-related outcomes in young athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) searched from inception through 15 January 2024. Meta-analysis was performed when data were available from two or more trials. Physical performance-related outcomes were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The certainty of evidence and quality of the included studies were rated using the GRADE scale and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 649 young athletes were included in the systematic review. Of those, 1 study showed a low risk of bias, 1 showed a high risk, and 15 showed some concerns. Compared to the PT group, INT significantly improved dynamic balance (MD = 7.29%, 95%CI 3.31 to 11.28, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 64.7%), static balance (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI -0.84 to -0.24, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), jumping performance (SMD = 0.53, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.73, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), sprinting capacity (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI -1.13 to -0.39, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 57.6%) and maximal strength (SMD = 1.01, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.67, p = 0.002, I<sup>2</sup> = 81.9%%). No significant between-group differences were identified for agility and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that INT has the potential to be an effective training method to improve physical performance in young athletes. Moreover, further research is needed to determine the effects and associated doses for young athletes of different age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Integrative Neuromuscular Training and Traditional Physical Fitness Training on Physical Performance Outcomes in Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ke-Wen Wan, Zi-Han Dai, Po-San Wong, Robin Sze-Tak Ho, Bjorn T Tam\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00811-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing youth's physical fitness levels during childhood and adolescence through prior training programs can significantly optimize their athletic performance. The integrative neuromuscular training (INT) model is designed to improve neuromuscular function and prevent athletic injuries, and is superior to the traditional physical training method. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of INT versus traditional physical fitness training (PT) on physical performance-related outcomes in young athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) searched from inception through 15 January 2024. Meta-analysis was performed when data were available from two or more trials. Physical performance-related outcomes were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The certainty of evidence and quality of the included studies were rated using the GRADE scale and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 649 young athletes were included in the systematic review. Of those, 1 study showed a low risk of bias, 1 showed a high risk, and 15 showed some concerns. Compared to the PT group, INT significantly improved dynamic balance (MD = 7.29%, 95%CI 3.31 to 11.28, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 64.7%), static balance (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI -0.84 to -0.24, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), jumping performance (SMD = 0.53, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.73, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), sprinting capacity (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI -1.13 to -0.39, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 57.6%) and maximal strength (SMD = 1.01, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.67, p = 0.002, I<sup>2</sup> = 81.9%%). No significant between-group differences were identified for agility and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that INT has the potential to be an effective training method to improve physical performance in young athletes. Moreover, further research is needed to determine the effects and associated doses for young athletes of different age groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00811-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00811-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：通过前期训练计划提高青少年儿童和青少年时期的身体健康水平可以显著优化他们的运动表现。综合神经肌肉训练（INT）模式旨在改善神经肌肉功能，预防运动损伤，优于传统的体育训练方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较INT与传统体能训练（PT）对年轻运动员体能相关结果的影响。方法：检索自成立至2024年1月15日的六个在线数据库（PubMed， MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, PsycINFO）。当数据来自两个或两个以上的试验时，进行荟萃分析。使用标准化平均差异（SMDs）和平均差异（MDs）（95%置信区间（ci））分析体能相关结果。分别使用GRADE量表和修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚工具对纳入研究的证据确定性和质量进行评分。结果：系统评价纳入17项随机对照试验，涉及649名青少年运动员。其中，1项研究显示偏倚风险低，1项研究显示偏倚风险高，15项研究显示存在一些问题。与PT组相比，INT组动态平衡（MD = 7.29%, 95%CI 3.31 ~ 11.28, p = 64.7%）、静态平衡（SMD = -0.54, 95%CI -0.84 ~ -0.24, p 2 = 0.0%）、跳跃能力（SMD = 0.53, 95%CI 0.32 ~ 0.73, p 2 = 0.0%）、冲刺能力（SMD = -0.76, 95%CI -1.13 ~ -0.39, p 2 = 57.6%）和最大力量（SMD = 1.01, 95%CI 0.35 ~ 1.67, p = 0.002, I2 = 81.9%）均有显著改善。在敏捷性和灵活性方面，组间没有显著差异。结论：我们的研究结果表明INT有潜力成为一种有效的训练方法来提高年轻运动员的身体表现。此外，需要进一步的研究来确定对不同年龄组的年轻运动员的影响和相关剂量。
Comparing the Effects of Integrative Neuromuscular Training and Traditional Physical Fitness Training on Physical Performance Outcomes in Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Enhancing youth's physical fitness levels during childhood and adolescence through prior training programs can significantly optimize their athletic performance. The integrative neuromuscular training (INT) model is designed to improve neuromuscular function and prevent athletic injuries, and is superior to the traditional physical training method. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of INT versus traditional physical fitness training (PT) on physical performance-related outcomes in young athletes.
Methods: Six online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) searched from inception through 15 January 2024. Meta-analysis was performed when data were available from two or more trials. Physical performance-related outcomes were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The certainty of evidence and quality of the included studies were rated using the GRADE scale and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool respectively.
Results: Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 649 young athletes were included in the systematic review. Of those, 1 study showed a low risk of bias, 1 showed a high risk, and 15 showed some concerns. Compared to the PT group, INT significantly improved dynamic balance (MD = 7.29%, 95%CI 3.31 to 11.28, p < 0.001, I2 = 64.7%), static balance (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI -0.84 to -0.24, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), jumping performance (SMD = 0.53, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.73, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), sprinting capacity (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI -1.13 to -0.39, p < 0.001, I2 = 57.6%) and maximal strength (SMD = 1.01, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.67, p = 0.002, I2 = 81.9%%). No significant between-group differences were identified for agility and flexibility.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that INT has the potential to be an effective training method to improve physical performance in young athletes. Moreover, further research is needed to determine the effects and associated doses for young athletes of different age groups.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
