利用深度特征距离评价MR图像重建的感知质量。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Philip M. Adamson, Arjun D. Desai, Jeffrey Dominic, Maya Varma, Christian Bluethgen, Jeff P. Wood, Ali B. Syed, Robert D. Boutin, Kathryn J. Stevens, Shreyas Vasanawala, John M. Pauly, Beliz Gunel, Akshay S. Chaudhari
{"title":"利用深度特征距离评价MR图像重建的感知质量。","authors":"Philip M. Adamson,&nbsp;Arjun D. Desai,&nbsp;Jeffrey Dominic,&nbsp;Maya Varma,&nbsp;Christian Bluethgen,&nbsp;Jeff P. Wood,&nbsp;Ali B. Syed,&nbsp;Robert D. Boutin,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Stevens,&nbsp;Shreyas Vasanawala,&nbsp;John M. Pauly,&nbsp;Beliz Gunel,&nbsp;Akshay S. Chaudhari","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Commonly used MR image quality (IQ) metrics have poor concordance with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ. Here, we develop and explore deep feature distances (DFDs)—distances computed in a lower-dimensional feature space encoded by a convolutional neural network (CNN)—as improved perceptual IQ metrics for MR image reconstruction. We further explore the impact of distribution shifts between images in the DFD CNN encoder training data and the IQ metric evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compare commonly used IQ metrics (PSNR and SSIM) to two “out-of-domain” DFDs with encoders trained on natural images, an “in-domain” DFD trained on MR images alone, and two domain-adjacent DFDs trained on large medical imaging datasets. We additionally compare these with several state-of-the-art but less commonly reported IQ metrics, visual information fidelity (VIF), noise quality metric (NQM), and the high-frequency error norm (HFEN). IQ metric performance is assessed via correlations with five expert radiologist reader scores of perceived diagnostic IQ of various accelerated MR image reconstructions. We characterize the behavior of these IQ metrics under common distortions expected during image acquisition, including their sensitivity to acquisition noise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All DFDs and HFEN correlate more strongly with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ than SSIM, PSNR, and other state-of-the-art metrics, with correlations being comparable to radiologist inter-reader variability. Surprisingly, out-of-domain DFDs perform comparably to in-domain and domain-adjacent DFDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A suite of IQ metrics, including DFDs and HFEN, should be used alongside commonly-reported IQ metrics for a more holistic evaluation of MR image reconstruction perceptual quality. We also observe that general vision encoders are capable of assessing visual IQ even for MR images.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":"94 1","pages":"317-330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using deep feature distances for evaluating the perceptual quality of MR image reconstructions\",\"authors\":\"Philip M. Adamson,&nbsp;Arjun D. Desai,&nbsp;Jeffrey Dominic,&nbsp;Maya Varma,&nbsp;Christian Bluethgen,&nbsp;Jeff P. Wood,&nbsp;Ali B. Syed,&nbsp;Robert D. Boutin,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Stevens,&nbsp;Shreyas Vasanawala,&nbsp;John M. Pauly,&nbsp;Beliz Gunel,&nbsp;Akshay S. Chaudhari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Commonly used MR image quality (IQ) metrics have poor concordance with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ. Here, we develop and explore deep feature distances (DFDs)—distances computed in a lower-dimensional feature space encoded by a convolutional neural network (CNN)—as improved perceptual IQ metrics for MR image reconstruction. We further explore the impact of distribution shifts between images in the DFD CNN encoder training data and the IQ metric evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compare commonly used IQ metrics (PSNR and SSIM) to two “out-of-domain” DFDs with encoders trained on natural images, an “in-domain” DFD trained on MR images alone, and two domain-adjacent DFDs trained on large medical imaging datasets. We additionally compare these with several state-of-the-art but less commonly reported IQ metrics, visual information fidelity (VIF), noise quality metric (NQM), and the high-frequency error norm (HFEN). IQ metric performance is assessed via correlations with five expert radiologist reader scores of perceived diagnostic IQ of various accelerated MR image reconstructions. We characterize the behavior of these IQ metrics under common distortions expected during image acquisition, including their sensitivity to acquisition noise.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All DFDs and HFEN correlate more strongly with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ than SSIM, PSNR, and other state-of-the-art metrics, with correlations being comparable to radiologist inter-reader variability. Surprisingly, out-of-domain DFDs perform comparably to in-domain and domain-adjacent DFDs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A suite of IQ metrics, including DFDs and HFEN, should be used alongside commonly-reported IQ metrics for a more holistic evaluation of MR image reconstruction perceptual quality. We also observe that general vision encoders are capable of assessing visual IQ even for MR images.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"317-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.30437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.30437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:常用的MR图像质量(IQ)指标与放射科医生感知的诊断IQ一致性较差。在这里,我们开发和探索深度特征距离(dfd)-在卷积神经网络(CNN)编码的低维特征空间中计算的距离-作为MR图像重建的改进感知IQ指标。我们进一步探讨了DFD CNN编码器训练数据中图像间分布移位对IQ度量评价的影响。方法:我们将常用的IQ指标(PSNR和SSIM)与两个在自然图像上训练的编码器的“域外”DFD、一个仅在MR图像上训练的“域内”DFD和两个在大型医学成像数据集上训练的域邻近DFD进行比较。此外,我们还将这些与几种最先进但较少报道的智商指标、视觉信息保真度(VIF)、噪声质量指标(NQM)和高频误差规范(HFEN)进行了比较。通过与五个专家放射科医生读者对各种加速磁共振图像重建的感知诊断IQ评分的相关性来评估IQ度量性能。我们描述了这些IQ指标在图像采集过程中预期的常见失真下的行为,包括它们对采集噪声的敏感性。结果:与SSIM、PSNR和其他最先进的指标相比,所有DFDs和HFEN与放射科医生感知的诊断IQ的相关性更强,相关性与放射科医生之间的差异相当。令人惊讶的是,域外dfd的性能与域内和域相邻dfd相当。结论:一套IQ指标,包括DFDs和HFEN,应该与通常报道的IQ指标一起使用,以更全面地评估MR图像重建的感知质量。我们还观察到,一般的视觉编码器能够评估视觉智商,甚至对MR图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using deep feature distances for evaluating the perceptual quality of MR image reconstructions

Purpose

Commonly used MR image quality (IQ) metrics have poor concordance with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ. Here, we develop and explore deep feature distances (DFDs)—distances computed in a lower-dimensional feature space encoded by a convolutional neural network (CNN)—as improved perceptual IQ metrics for MR image reconstruction. We further explore the impact of distribution shifts between images in the DFD CNN encoder training data and the IQ metric evaluation.

Methods

We compare commonly used IQ metrics (PSNR and SSIM) to two “out-of-domain” DFDs with encoders trained on natural images, an “in-domain” DFD trained on MR images alone, and two domain-adjacent DFDs trained on large medical imaging datasets. We additionally compare these with several state-of-the-art but less commonly reported IQ metrics, visual information fidelity (VIF), noise quality metric (NQM), and the high-frequency error norm (HFEN). IQ metric performance is assessed via correlations with five expert radiologist reader scores of perceived diagnostic IQ of various accelerated MR image reconstructions. We characterize the behavior of these IQ metrics under common distortions expected during image acquisition, including their sensitivity to acquisition noise.

Results

All DFDs and HFEN correlate more strongly with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ than SSIM, PSNR, and other state-of-the-art metrics, with correlations being comparable to radiologist inter-reader variability. Surprisingly, out-of-domain DFDs perform comparably to in-domain and domain-adjacent DFDs.

Conclusion

A suite of IQ metrics, including DFDs and HFEN, should be used alongside commonly-reported IQ metrics for a more holistic evaluation of MR image reconstruction perceptual quality. We also observe that general vision encoders are capable of assessing visual IQ even for MR images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信